14 December 2016

Elegirán a representantes raizales para mesa de concertación



Este viernes 9 de diciembre se dieron cita en el auditorio de la Gobernación, el viceministro del Interior Luis Ernesto Gómez; el gobernador Ronald Housni Jaller; miembros del grupo ‘Raizal Union’ que adelantaron la manifestación del 19/11 que propició este encuentro, y otros miembros de la población raizal.
Tras una prolongada deliberación con abundantes intervenciones de los diversos líderes allí presentes, se acordó elegir en asamblea el próximo sábado 17 de diciembre a los representantes para la mesa de concertación con este Ministerio.  
La anunciada reunión se programó luego de que el grupo de manifestantes del 19/11 levantara el bloqueo que mantuvo cerrado un céntrico sector de San Andrés durante cuatro días y donde exigían presencia del alto gobierno para ello; esto con el fin de poner en conocimiento de la Presidencia de la República un pliego de peticiones, entre las que se cuentan, la declaratoria del Estatuto Raizal y la solución a la problemática de la sobrepoblación.
El fin de la reunión era el de fijar una mesa de concertación entre miembros de esta población y el Gobierno Nacional para tratar las problemáticas planteadas, sin embargo varios de los presentes manifestaron dudas sobre quiénes serían los representantes raizales en estos encuentros con el alto gobierno.
Luego de varios planteamientos y posturas, se acordó que éstos se definirían en una asamblea autónoma que se realizará el próximo sábado 17 de diciembre a las 2:00 pm en centro cultural Tamarind Tree en La Loma, a donde se cita a los líderes de esta población que contará con el respaldo organizacional de la Defensoría del Pueblo y el apoyo de la Procuraduría Departamental como garante.
Por otra parte, a pesar de no concretarse la mesa de concertación con el Gobierno Nacional, el viceministro Gómez manifestó abiertamente su intención y apoyo para que se lleve a cabo y propuso que la misma se instale en la última semana de enero de 2017, una vez definidos los representantes de la población raizal que harán parte de dicha Mesa.
Así mismo, el funcionario especificó que según la competencia de su Ministerio, los temas a tratarse en dicha mesa girarán en torno a lo relacionado con derechos, constitución y representación política raizal.

13 December 2016

'Decolonisation Fundamental to Pacific Sovereignty' - Pacific NGOs



Piango


Decolonisation Fundamental to Pacific Sovereignty, CSOs Tell GPEDC


Suva (3 December 2016) - The decolonisation of indigenous peoples in Tahiti, New Caledonia, West Papua, and the American territories is intrinsically tied to the sovereignty of the Pacific region.

These and the need to expand the definition of fragility to inculcate climate induced vulnerability as a Pacific specific concern are key issues that Pacific delegates have highlighted at the High Level Ministerial meeting for Global Partnership for Effective Development Cooperation in Nairobi, Kenya

Pacific Islands Association of NGOs executive director, Emele Duituturaga said these issues was highlighted in the Pacific Regional Caucus statement that was incorporated in the HLM GPEDC CSO Communique.

“Pacific regional civil society delegates reaffirm the importance of recognising and respecting the sovereignty of the Pacific region in terms of self-determination and decolonisation of pacific peoples in French Polynesia, New Caledonia, West Papua, and the American territories,” the communique stated.

“This is linked to the continued displacement of indigenous people as a result of militarisation and trade agreements for development, exploiting our natural resources and people, leaving fragile and vulnerable to climate change, lifestyle diseases, conflict, and other related social ailment characteristic of marginalised people.”

Duituturaga said on the Pacific stance to expand the definition of Fragility, Pacific delegates called for the inclusion of climate induced vulnerability in recognition of the Pacific’s position at the frontline of climate change.

Pacific delegates at the meeting include civil society representatives from Guam, Samoa, Fiji, New Zealand, PNG and Palau.

Meanwhile, Pacific Youth Council’s Manasa Vatanitawake participated as a panellist at the plenary session, on the topic, “Leaving No One Behind on Climate, Culture and Identity” as key issues for Pacific Youth, prior to the end of the meeting.

12 December 2016

"GRACIAS, FIDEL" - RAFAEL CANCEL MIRANDA

09 December 2016

DUTCH ADMINISTERED CARIBBEAN COLONIES SHOULD BE ADDED TO UNITED NATIONS COLONIAL LIST - CARIBBEAN CONFERENCE


"Deeply concerned that the people of Bonaire and Sint Eustatius are presently being governed, contrary to democratic norms, under a political status of political and economic inequality not of their choosing." 


***************

CONFERENCE ON THE POLITICAL FUTURE
OF THE DUTCH-ADMINISTERED CARIBBEAN

FINAL COMMUNIQUÉ 

Kralendiik, Bonaire, December 1, 2016

The Conference on the Political Future of the Dutch-Administered Caribbean,

Having met at Bonaire, West Indies on 1st December 2016,

Aware that the political status of Bonaire, Sint Eustatius (Statia) and Saba was transformed in 2010 from being a part of the autonomous country of the (former) Netherlands Antilles to a new political arrangement unilaterally advanced by the Kingdom of the Netherlands akin to that of 'partial integration', and characterized by serious political and economic inequality, rather than the promised political and economic equality originally envisaged.

 Also aware that this new status is tantamount to unilateral annexation, and is wholly inconsistent with the minimum standards of full self-government and equality required on the basis of international principles of democratic governance,

Bearing in mind that the 'public entity' status does not reflect the wishes of the people of Bonaire who had previously selected a political status of "direct ties to the Kingdom" of the Netherlands in a 2004 referendum rather than the political status of "public entity" which has been unilaterally and systematically imposed by the Kingdom since the 2010 dismantling of the Netherlands Antilles and the subsequent transition,

Also bearing in mind that the 'public entity' political status was formally rejected by the people of Bonaire in a 2015 referendum by a decisive 'No' vote of over 65 per cent, and taking note that discussions are underway for the conduct of a second referendum to be conducted, with United Nations (U.N.) involvement, so that the people can choose from a group of political status options of democratic governance and political equality,

Taking into account that the people of Sint Eustatius voted in its 2005 referendum to remain within a restructured autonomous country of the Netherlands Antilles, but as the 2005 referendum results resulted in the dismantlement of that autonomous country, the Island Council of Sint Eustatius subsequently approved a motion to accept the ‘direct ties’ arrangement offered to Bonaire and Saba, even as the people had not voted in favour of the status, and even as the nature of its political and economic inequality had not yet been revealed,

Also taking into account that the people of Sint Eustatius in a 2014 referendum, under official observation of the U.N. Electoral Affairs Division of the Department of Political Affairs, formally rejected the imposed 'public entity' status by voting for a more autonomous status from a list of political status options, and recalling that the results of the 2014 referendum were formally certified and endorsed by motion of the Island Council on 25th May 2015 as a clear mandate of the people,

Alarmed that the Kingdom of the Netherlands, in spite of the democratically expressed wishes of the people of Sint Eustatius and Bonaire in their rejection of the imposed political status of ‘public entity’ in 2014 and 2015, respectively, is proceeding through measures in the Kingdom Parliament to formally annex the two territories through a process of ‘anchoring’ the two islands in the Dutch Constitution, and further alarmed that this unilateral process of the Kingdom would result in a legitimization of the dependency status contrary to international norms of democratic governance and in opposition to  the expressed will of the people of Bonaire and Sint Eustatius,

Expresses its deep concern for the suspension of direct contact by the Government of the Kingdom of the Netherlands with the democratically elected government of  Sint Eustatius, as announced by the Kingdom Minister of Interior Affairs and Kingdom Relations on 30th November 2016, following on from a similar suspension in 2015 which lasted for a period of six months,

Further expresses its deep concern for the imposition of unilateral financial supervision which requires Kingdom approval for public expenditures by the Government Sint Eustatius,

Recalling the Motion adopted by the Island Council of Sint Eustatius on 28th May 2015 which confirmed, inter alia, that the population of Sint Eustatius had not yet exhausted all its options as far as exercising its right to self-determination in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations, and which reminded the Netherlands of its continued obligations towards Sint Eustatius as part of the former Netherlands Antilles,

Taking note of the proposed 'Raizal Statute' submitted by the Raizal Authority of the archipelago of Andres, Providencia and Santa Catalina to the Government of Columbia to modernize the political, socio-economic and constitutional relationship between the people of the archipelago and the State of Columbia, and affirming the self-determination aspirations of the Raizal people,

Also taking note of the “Assessment of self-governance sufficiency in conformity with internationally-recognised standards – Country Curacao” undertaken in 2012 by the global Dependency Studies Project which found that the present governance model in place in Curacao emerging from the 2010 dismantlement process of the Netherlands Antilles further reduced the level of self-government to a diminished autonomous model, and is not in compliance with contemporary international standards of full self-government,
           
1.        Affirms that the referendum results of 2014 in Sint Eustatius, and of 2015 in Bonaire, constituted a formal, genuine and legitimate refutation of the 'public entity' status as expressed by the people, and alarmed that the 'public entity' status imposed on the people of Sint Eustatius and Bonaire had been misrepresented as a genuine status of political equality by the Kingdom of the Netherlands in 2010 at the dissolution of the Netherlands Antilles,

2.        Deeply concerned that the people of Bonaire and Sint Eustatius are presently being governed, contrary to democratic norms, under a political status of political and economic inequality not of their choosing,

3.        Reaffirms the continued applicability to Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba of relevant international law doctrine on self-determination and decolonization, including the provisions of Chapter XI on the "Declaration Regarding Non Self-Governing Territories,"

4.        Also reaffirms the continued applicability of  Article 73 (b) of the United Nations (U.N.) Charter which mandates that "Members of the United Nations which have or assume responsibilities for the administration of territories whose peoples have not yet attained a full measure of self-government recognize the principle that the interests of the inhabitants of these territories are paramount, and accept as a sacred trust the obligation to promote to the utmost, within the system of international peace and security established by the present Charter, the well-being of the inhabitants of these territories, and, to this end to develop self-government, to take due account of the political aspirations of the peoples, and to assist them in the progressive development of their free political institutions, according to the particular circumstances of each territory and its peoples and their varying stages of advancement,"

5.        Emphasizes the continued applicability to Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba of the U.N. Decolonization Declaration [Resolution 1514 (XV)], its companion Resolution 1541 (XV), and all other relevant U.N. resolutions, as well as the present Third International Decade for the Eradication of Colonialism and its plan of action,


6.        Also emphasizes the applicability of relevant General Assembly resolutions which recognize that "the existence of colonialism in any form or manifestation," as "incompatible with the Charter of the United Nations, the (Decolonization) Declaration and the Universal Declaration of Human  Rights' and further emphasizes the applicability of the relevant resolutions of the General Assembly which confirm that self-determination is a fundamental human right protected under the core human rights conventions including the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR), and the Convention on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (CERD), et al,

7.        Takes note with interest that the U.N. General Assembly Resolution 945 (X) of 15 December 1955 removing the former Netherlands Antilles from the U.N. list of Non Self-Governing Territories did not affirm that the former Netherlands Antilles had achieved a full measure of self-government, thus leaving open the possibility for the U.N. to resume formal review of the self-governance sufficiency of the former territory and any of its former constituent parts, in particular Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba, with the aim of fostering a genuine process of self-determination,          

8.        Calls on the Kingdom of the Netherlands, as a matter of urgency, to lift the financial supervision imposed on the Government of Sint Eustatius, and to resume official communication with its democratically-elected government,

9.        Further calls on the Kingdom of the Netherlands, as a matter of urgency, to cease any action in its Parliament to legitimize (anchor) the 'public entity status of Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba in the constitution of the Netherlands, and to enter into immediate consultations with the elected governments of both territories to carry out the will of the people of Sint Eustatius and Bonaire, as democratically expressed in the respective 2014 and 2015 referenda, consistent with their inalienable right to self-determination.


10.        Calls for the Kingdom of the Netherlands and/or other relevant U.N. member States to initiate the necessary procedures for the re-inscription of the former Netherlands Antilles islands of Bonaire and Sint Eustatius on the United Nations list of Non Self-Governing Territories to provide the international community with  the required platform to review, in depth where democratic deficiencies in the dependency governance arrangement may exist,

11.      Endorses the commissioning of an independent Self Governance Assessment of the political status and constitutional arrangements of Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba, through the use of the "Corbin Self-Governance Indicators," to determine the nature and scope of the public entity status according to international standards, and requests that the necessary resources be identified for the Assessment to be carried out as a key substantive document to inform the U.N. in its consideration of the re-inscription process of Bonaire and Saint Eustatius.

12.      Calls on the Government of Columbia, as a matter of urgency, to enter into negotiations with the recognized representatives of the archipelago of San Andres, Providencia and Santa Catalina, under the observation of the relevant international  human rights mechanism(s), on the proposed Raizal Statute which provides for alternative political status options to the status quo, which addresses a broad range of political, socio-economic and constitutional issues and concerns, and which is aimed at the modernization of the political status relationship between the Raizal people and the Columbian state, and recognizes the inalienable right of the people of the archipelago of San Andres, Providencia and Santa Catalina to self-determination in accordance with international law, in particular, the United Nations Charter and relevant human rights instruments.



08 December 2016

COPPPAL rechaza posible intento de recolonizar las denominadas islas holandesas




Kralendijk, Bonaire 1ro de diciembre de 2016 

La Conferencia Permanente de Partidos Políticos de América Latina y El Caribe, Copppal, en reunión celebrada en Bonaire con las formaciones políticas de esta isla, de Aruba y Curazao, que pertenecen a nuestra entidad regional y que encabezó su presidente, Manolo Pichardo, discutió la situación por la que atraviesan las mencionadas islas que a decir de los asistentes retroceden hacia un proceso de recolonización que viola acuerdos suscritos en las Naciones Unidas. 

Los dirigentes de Bonaire manifestaron que su pueblo expresó, mediante un referéndum, que no desea quedar en el estatus actual de municipio estatal (estatus colonial). 

De igual forma el pueblo de Statia, también en referéndum, externó que no quiere mantener su condición colonial, mientras que Curazao manifestó su desacuerdo con la supervisión que controla sus finanzas y su aparato judicial. 

Con la imposición por parte de Holanda de un Gobernador en Aruba, un colegio de supervisión financiera y el traslado de su Corte de Justicia a Curazao, la corona holandesa viola los acuerdos de 1954, en que la ONU insta a Holanda a iniciar un proceso de descolonización y autodeterminación de los pueblos bajo su dominio, en el que el país europeo se comprometía a hacer un reporte anual del avance del proceso sugerido. 

Además de las violaciones a los acuerdos de 1954 Holanda ha incurrido en el desconocimiento de la autonomía que se le concedió a Aruba en 1983, tras una intensa lucha conducida por Bertico Croes y otros importantes dirigentes. 

Por igual, los partidos de Bonaire denunciaron que Holanda ha burlado el pacto 16/54 que define las reglas para impedir el ingreso masivo de holandeses europeos a las islas, porque con ello y la decisión de que en 90 días pueden ejercer el derecho al voto, podrían incidir de forma decisiva en los asuntos concernientes a los nativos, lo que representaría un nuevo tipo de colonización. 

Partiendo de que algunas de las islas no están siendo tomadas en cuenta para la definición de su autodeterminación, la Conferencia Permanente de Partidos Políticos de América Latina y El Caribe, Copppal, exige poner a Bonaire, Statia y Saba en la lista del Comité de Descolonización de la ONU como pueblos que no tienen su propio gobierno. 

Además pedimos de manera enérgica que se respete la autonomía de estas islas y rechazamos cualquier supervisión sobre Aruba, Curazao y Saint Martin porque éstas pudiesen constituirse en acciones recolonizadoras. 

La Copppal se compromete a acompañar a los partidos de las denominadas islas holandesas en su lucha contra el estatus colonial y la puesta en marcha de un posible esquema de recolonización recurriendo a los mecanismos que pone en nuestras manos la Comunidad Internacional e instituciones como la Comunidad de Estados Latinoamericanos y Caribeños, Celac, la Unión de Naciones Suramericanas, Unasur, El Sistema de Integración Centroamericana, SICA, La Comunidad Andina de Naciones, CAN y la Comunidad del Caribe, CARICOM. 

También, notificaremos a las expresiones parlamentarias de los esquemas de integración de nuestra región: Al Parlamento Centroamericano, Parlacen, al Parlamento del Sur, Parlasur, al Parlamento Andino, Parlandino y al Parlamento Latinoamericano, Parlatino; así como a los parlamentos internos de Curazao, Bonaire y Aruba. 

Asimismo, nuestra Conferencia insta a todas las islas a iniciar un proceso de integración que permita empujar sus luchas en una sola dirección, de suerte que la brega por la soberanía tenga mayor peso e impulso.
________________________________

English translation

Kralendijk, Bonaire December 1, 2016

The Permanent Conference of Political Parties of Latin America and the Caribbean, (COPPPAL), in a meeting held in Bonaire with the political formations of this island, Aruba and Curacao, which belong to our regional entity and headed by its president, Manolo Pichardo, discussed the situation that cross the mentioned islands that to say of the assistants go back towards a process of recolonización that violates agreements signed in the United Nations.

Bonaire leaders said that their people expressed, through a referendum, that they do not want to remain in the current status of a state municipality (colonial status). Likewise, the people of Statia, also in a referendum, stated that they do not want to maintain their colonial status, while Curacao expressed their disagreement with the supervision that controls its finances and judicial apparatus.

With the imposition by Holland of a Governor in Aruba, a financial supervision college and the transfer of his Court of Justice to Curacao, the Dutch crown violates the 1954 agreements, in which the UN urges the Netherlands to initiate a process of Decolonization and self-determination of the peoples under its control, in which the European country committed itself to make an annual report of the progress of the suggested process.

In addition to the violations of the agreements of 1954 Holland has incurred in the ignorance of the autonomy that was granted to Aruba in 1983, after an intense fight led by Bertico Croes and other important leaders.

The parties in Bonaire also denounced that Holland has circumvented clause 16/54 which defines the rules to prevent the massive entry of European Dutch into the islands, because with it and the decision that in 90 days they can exercise the right to vote, could have a decisive impact on matters concerning the natives, which would represent a new type of colonization.

Given that some of the islands are not being taken into account for the definition of their self-determination, the Permanent Conference of Political Parties of Latin America and the Caribbean, (COPPPAL), demands to put Bonaire, Statia and Saba on the list of the Committee on Decolonization of the United Nations as peoples that do not have their own government.

We also strongly urge respect for the autonomy of these islands and reject any oversight over Aruba, Curaçao and Saint Martin because these could constitute re-colonizing actions.

COPPPAL is committed to accompany the parties of the so-called Dutch islands in their fight against colonial status and the implementation of a possible recolonization scheme using the mechanisms that the International Community and institutions such as the Community of Latin American and Caribbean States (CELAC), the Union of South American Nations (UNASUR), the Central American Integration System (SICA), the Andean Community of Nations (CAN) and the Caribbean Community, (CARICOM).

We will also notify the parliamentary expressions of the integration schemes of our region: the Central American Parliament PARLACEN); the Parliament of the South (PARLASUR); the Andean Parliament (PARLANDINO) and the Latin American Parliament (PARLATINO); as well as the internal parliaments of Curaçao, Bonaire and Aruba.

Our Conference also urges all the islands to begin a process of integration that will allow them to push their struggles in one direction, so that the struggle for sovereignty will have greater weight and momentum.

07 December 2016

U.N. General Assembly adopts 2016 resolutions on decolonisation of Caribbean, Pacific non self-governing territories



PRESS RELEASE
(eXCERPTS)
GA/11868
6 DECEMBER 2016
SEVENTY-FIRST SESSION, 53RD MEETING (PM)

General Assembly, Taking Action on Reports of Its Fourth Committee, Adopts 37 Draft Resolutions, Decisions

Upon the recommendation of its Fourth Committee (Special Political and Decolonization), the General Assembly adopted 35 resolutions and 2 decisions (on 5th December).
.....
Turning to decolonization questions, the Assembly adopted 21 draft resolutions and one draft decision.  Taking up a draft titled “Implementation of the Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples by the specialized agencies and the international institutions associated with the United Nations”, the Assembly adopted it by a recorded vote of 125 in favour to none against, with 55 abstentions.  According to that text, the Assembly urged those and other United Nations entities to provide moral and material assistance, as needed, to the peoples of Non-Self-Governing Territories.
By recorded vote, the Assembly also adopted drafts on assistance to Palestine refugees; persons displaced as a result of the June 1967 and subsequent hostilities; Palestine refugees’ properties and their revenues; Israeli settlements in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem and the occupied Syrian Golan; Israeli practices affecting the human rights of the Palestinian people in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem; as well as a resolution on the occupied Syrian Golan.  It also adopted a text on the applicability of the Geneva Convention relative to the protection of civilian persons in time of war, of 12 August 1949, to the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, and other occupied Arab territories.
The Assembly went on to adopt, also by recorded vote, draft resolution on information from Non-Self-Governing Territories transmitted under Article 73(e) of the United Nations Charter; economic and other activities affecting the interests of the peoples of the Non-Self-Governing Territories; and dissemination of information on decolonization.  It further adopted, by recorded vote, texts relating to implementation of the Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples by specialized agencies and international institutions associated with the United Nations, as well as to implementation of the Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples.
Closely following the Fourth Committee’s recommendations, the Assembly also adopted, without a vote, a series of annual texts relating to the decolonization of specific Non-Self-Governing Territories.  They included drafts affirming the right to self-determination for the peoples of Western Sahara, Tokelau, American Samoa, Anguilla, Bermuda, British Virgin Islands, Cayman Islands, Guam, Montserrat, Pitcairn, Saint Helena, Turks and Caicos Islands, United States Virgin Islands, New Caledonia and French Polynesia.
Also without a vote, the Assembly adopted drafts relating to special political missions, atomic radiation, outer space affairs and offers by Member States of study and training facilities for inhabitants of Non-Self-Governing Territories.
It took note of a report on the comprehensive review of the whole question of peacekeeping operations in all their aspects, and another on the programme planning for the Fourth Committee.
Acting without a vote, the Assembly adopted two decisions, one relating to the question of Gibraltar and the other to the revitalization of its own work.
Presenting Fourth Committee reports for the Assembly’s consideration was that body’s Rapporteur.
.....
(A)waiting action were reports on:  questions relating to information (document A/71/497); information from Non-Self-Governing Territories transmitted under Article 73 e of the Charter of the United Nations (document A/71/498); economic and other activities which affect the interests of the peoples of the Non-Self-Governing Territories (document A/71/499); implementation of the Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples by the specialized agencies and the international institutions associated with the United Nations (document A/71/500); offers by Member States of study and training facilities for inhabitants of Non-Self-Governing Territories (document A/71/501); implementation of the Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples (document A/71/502); revitalization of the work of the General Assembly (document A/71/503); and programme planning (document A/71/504).
.....
By a recorded vote of 176 in favour to none against, with 5 abstentions (Central African Republic, France, Israel, United Kingdom, United States), the Assembly adopted draft resolution I, “Information from Non-Self-Governing Territories transmitted under Article 73 e of the Charter of the United Nations” (document A/71/23, chapter XIII).  By that text, it requested the administering Powers concerned to transmit regularly to the Secretary-General statistical and other technical information relating to economic, social and educational conditions in the Territories for which they were respectively responsible.
It also adopted draft resolution IV on “Economic and other activities which affect the interests of the people of the Non-Self-Governing Territories” (document A/71/23, chapter XIII), by a recorded vote of 177 in favour to 2 against (Israel, United States), with 2 abstentions (France, United Kingdom).  By that text, the Assembly urged the administering Powers concerned to safeguard and guarantee the inalienable right of the peoples of Non-Self-Governing Territories to their natural resources, and to establish control over the future development of those resources.
The Assembly then took up draft resolution III, “Implementation of the Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples by the specialized agencies and the international institutions associated with the United Nations” (document A/71/23, chapter XIII), adopting it by a recorded vote of 125 in favour to none against, with 55 abstentions.  In line with that text, the Assembly urged those and other entities of the United Nations system to provide moral and material assistance, as needed, to the peoples of Non-Self-Governing Territories.
Taking up a draft resolution titled “Offers by Member States of study and training facilities for inhabitants of Non-Self-Governing Territories” (document A/71/501/L.3), the Assembly adopted it without a vote.
Acting without a vote, it went on to adopt draft resolutions on the Question of Western Sahara (document A/71/502/L.4), Question of Tokelau (document A/71/23, chapter XIII, p.60); Question of American Samoa (document A/71/23, chapter XIII, p.63); Question of Anguilla (document A/71/23, chapter XIII, p.68); Question of Bermuda (document A/71/23, chapter XIII, p.73); Question of the British Virgin Islands (document A/71/23, chapter XIII, p.77); Question of the Cayman Islands (document A/71/23, chapter XIII, p.81); Question of Guam (document A/71/23, chapter XIII, p.91); Question of Montserrat (document A/71/23, chapter XIII, p.91); Question of Pitcairn (document A/71/23, chapter XIII, p.95); Question of Saint Helena (document A/71/23, chapter XIII, p.99); Question of the Turks and Caicos Islands (document A/71/23, chapter XIII, p.104); Question of the United States Virgin Islands (document A/71/23, chapter XIII, p.109); Question of New Caledonia (document A/71/23, chapter XIII, p.114); and the Question of French Polynesia (document A/71/23, chapter XIII, p.120).
The Assembly then adopted, by a recorded vote of 174 in favour to 3 against (Israel, United Kingdom, United States), with 2 abstentions (France, Togo), draft resolution II, “Dissemination of information on decolonization” (document A/71/23, XVI, chapter XIII), by which the Assembly requested that the United Nations take measures to publicize its work in the field of decolonization.
By a recorded vote of 171 in favour to 5 against (Côte d’Ivoire, Israel, Morocco, United Kingdom, United States), with 4 abstentions (Colombia, France, Palau, Togo), the Assembly adopted draft resolution V, “Implementation of the Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples” (document A/71/23, chapter XIII).   By that text, the Assembly called upon administering Powers of the Non-Self-Governing Territories to continue to cooperate with the Special Committee on Decolonization in the discharge of its mandate.  It further called upon administering Powers to facilitate the Special Committee’s visiting missions to the Territories on a case-by-case basis, and to ensure that their economic and other activities in the Territories would not adversely affect their peoples’ interests but instead promote development.
Acting without a vote, the Assembly then adopted two draft decisions, one titled “Question of Gibraltar” (document A/71/503/L.17), and the other concerning the proposed programme of work and timetable for its seventy-second session (documents A/71/503/L.16).
Finally, the Assembly took note of the Fourth Committee’s report on programme planning (document A/71/504).

____________________________________________

Following the General Assembly proceedings, one Pacific decolonization scholar commented:

"It remains a sad commentary that the countries which administer most of the remaining colonies of the world (France, the United Kingdom and the United States) continue their opposition to resolving the contemporary colonialism question as mandated under the United Nations Charter. At the General Assembly session, the two French diplomats scrambled out of their seat in the General Assembly Hall - in rather sad comedic fashion - and ran to the side of the room as the resolution on French Polynesia was being adopted (see U.N. webcast). They returned to their seat when the next agenda item was announced. This rather bizarre diplomatic behavior has been repeated since 2013 and should be unbefitting of a permanent member of the Security Council. Unfortunately, France continues to reject the 'rule of law' by refusing to formally acknowledge the 2013 consensus General Assembly resolution that re-inscribed French Polynesia on the U.N. formal list of colonies, and by rejecting the legal requirement as an administering power to transmit information to the U.N. on developments in the territory which it administers. Apparently, adherence to the U.N. Charter as international law only applies to some countries when it suits them. Meanwhile, the British continue to promote that their brand of colonialism is palatable, while the U.S. rarely speaks on the matter. It is an interesting world we live in at the end of 2016. Despite this intransigence, these countries must be held to account "



28 November 2016

BONAIRE CONFERENCE TO EXAMINE DUTCH COLONIES IN CARIBBEAN

Conference to convene on December 1st


Foundation Nos Boneiru BEK
Kaya Sur Bartola 6
Bonaire




The purpose of the conference is to advance the understanding of the process of self-determination for the Dutch-administered and other territories similarly situated. The convention brings together leaders, professionals and specialists of various backgrounds to facilitate communicate and to promote education on the political status options of full political equality. To this end, the following topics and themes will be explored:

- The political evolution of the Dutch-administered Caribbean to the dissolution of the former autonomous country of the Netherlands Antilles in 2010.

- The implications of the dismantling of the Netherlands Antilles and the evolution of 'public entity' status (Bonaire, Saba and Sint Eustatius.

- The evolution of autonomous country status (Curacao, Sint Maarten and Aruba) 

- Other dependency arrangements

- From 'public entity' status to full self-government

- The relevancy of the international self-determination process and its applicability to the 'public entity'  and autonomous country political status arrangements


Image result for Dutch Caribbean
dcbiodata.net