02 July 2013

Apology, reparations for slavery in Curacao, Suriname, Guadeloupe demanded from Dutch and French

wikipedia 

As the U.S. Virgin Islands   (formerly Danish West Indies) commemorates its 165th anniversary of emancipation on 3rd July, a number of other countries in the Caribbean region have stepped up their calls for formal apologies and reparations to address this crime against humanity perpetuated by European colonial powers.   


See "Denmark's Statement on its Slave History"



*************




BSP demands apology for 229 years of slavery

Amigoe



WILLEMSTAD — In letters to King Willem-Alexander and the Dutch premier Mark Rutte (VVD) the local peace movement Ban Sembra Pas (BSP) demanded that the Netherlands apologize for 229 years of slavery on Curaçao. The organization sent these letters after it initially requested the (previous) government of Curaçao to demand an apology from the Netherlands. However, this request was never honored, according to BSP. In the letters to King Willem-Alexander and Premier Rutte, BSP mentioned the year of Tula, which was announced recently by the government of Curaçao.



BSP also mentioned Tula’s leading role with the slave revolt of August 17th 1795. According to the peace movement, from 1634 to the abolition of slavery in 1863 Curaçao was one of the largest slave depots of the West India Company (WIC).



“Tula’s battle is commemorated on Curaçao on August 17th. The island government of Curaçao declared Tula national hero on August 16th 2010. Within the framework of commemorating the abolition of 150 years slavery on Curaçao on July 1st 2013, we respectfully request His Majesty to use you influence so that the government of the Netherlands will finally sincerely apologize for the 229 years of slavery on Curaçao”, BSP wrote in its letter to King Willem-Alexander. However, in the letter to government of the Netherlands, BSP specifically requested that the former apologizes.


According to BSP, an apology from the government of the Netherlands will close the darkest chapter in the history of mankind, and mark a new beginning for a new friendship between Curaçao and the Netherlands. The request to Premier Rutte was also addressed to him in his capacity has chairman of the National Council of Ministers, while Willem-Alexander was addressed as ‘king of all citizens in the Kingdom of the Netherlands’.




************************


Demand for slavery reparations delivered to Dutch embassy in Suriname



  


image
In its petition, the Committee requests that The Netherlands
 acknowledges the suffering of people who were enslaved here.



by Marvin Hokstam

CMC



PARAMARIBO, Suriname, Friday June 28, 2013 - The compensation many descendants of Dutch slavery feel is due to them became official after members of the Committee Reparations Slavery Past Suriname deposited a claim at the Dutch embassy here.


“We want to discuss the material and immaterial damage,” said Committee Chairman Armand Zunder as he presented a petition to Dutch charge d'affaires Ernst Noorman.

Zunder was joined at the presentation by Committee member Guno Rijssel, who stressed “we’re did not go begging. We only demand a satisfactory settlement that is due to us.“

In its petition, the Committee requests that The Netherlands acknowledges the suffering of people who were enslaved here.

“We request that the Dutch Government appoint an institute with which we could enter into dialogue regarding the reparations of the damage we suffered,” Zunder said.

He acknowledged efforts by The Netherlands to give Afro-Surinamers a place in the Dutch community -like the Slavery Memorial statues of Amsterdam and Rotterdam-, but said that these were but feeble.

The Dutch shipped an estimated one million Africans from their continent to work on plantations in “the new world”. Slavery was officially abolished on July 1st 1863, which this year is 150 years ago. The Netherlands has not offered a formal apology.

Zunder, an economist, has previously published research results that showed that the Netherlands earned some Euro 125 billion (One Euro =US$1.29 cents) from Suriname during slavery.

“That money was earned through the hard work of the slaves and they were never compensated; in contrast, the traders and the plantation owners were. They got Euro 100 million. And that has been invested in the Dutch economy. The country still benefits from these investments,” he said.

Charge d'affaires Noorman urged the committee to “wait and see” what message Dutch Social Affairs Minister Lodewijck Asscher will have when he addresses the slavery abolition memorial event at Amsterdam’s Oostpark on July 1.

“Whatever Asscher will have to say is for the wider public. The Committee expects a formal response in writing from The Hague to our petition. The Netherlands only seems to want to talk about oppression and the slavery that exists today, and disregard the riches they earned from enslaving our ancestors,” he said.

Zunder said that he did not consider his Committee a mouthpiece of the Surinamese government, but stressed that he was following a path that has been laid by Government.

“Government never changed the standpoint it took at the United Nations World Conference Against Racism (WCAR), held in Durban, South Africa in September 2001. We simply filled in the blanks and used that as our point of departure. Slavery was a crime against humanity, and that has no statute of limitations,” he said.

He expected a tedious process, but said he was in for the long haul.

“We have to set up the organization, start the dialogue with our community and then be ready to tackle whatever will be thrown at us by the institute the Dutch Government will appoint to talk to us,” he said. “Fact is that reparations are due because our ancestors suffered material and immaterial damage.”

Asked whether he thinks compensation should be in the form of funds or in the form of projects that help the ancestors of slaves bridge disadvantages, he said: “Well that’s what we need to start the dialogues for.”

Talk of slavery reparations has been ongoing for a while, but this is the first time that an actual request has been submitted with the Dutch Government. The committee finds many likeminded individuals in the region.

Pro-vice Chancellor of the University of the West Indies (UWI), Sir Hilary Beckles recently made a case for slavery reparations in his book, titled “Britain’s Black Debt: Reparations owed the Caribbean for Slavery and Indigenous Genocide.”

Calls have also been made for compensation in Guyana, Antigua and Barbuda, Jamaica.

St Vincent and the Grenadines Prime Minister Dr. Ralph Goncalves has also weighed in on the issue, saying that the Caribbean must remain part of the leadership on the debate of reparation for slavery.

Zunder said he felt reinforced because the reparations issue being a hot topic in the Caribbean.

“Our countries are all former colonies. Slavery and reparations are a shared history and reparations are a topic we can approach together. There is movement to have it become an agenda point for the Heads of Government to discuss,” he said.

“The process is developing and the good thing about it is that the Caribbean governments are starting to get involved, which gives us a stronger platform to work from. So far we have been footing the bill ourselves,” he said.
*****
 CONVENTION POUR UNE GUADELOUPE NOUVELLE

COMMUNIQUÉ SUR LA COMMÉMORATION PAR LES FRANÇAIS DE L' ABOLITION DE L'ESCLAVAGE DU 10 MAI 2013


Ce 10 mai 2013 , les français commémorent dans la discrétion, le peuple français étant profondément esclavagiste, l'abolition de leur esclavage , en pensant que cela suffira à faire oublier tous les crimes qu'ils ont commis , qu'ils continuent de commettre et qu'ils commettrons dans l'avenir , le gêne impérial étant solidement ancré dans leur mémoire.

Encore une fois leurs dirigeants , cette fois socialiste et de gauche , déclarent à nouveau à qui veut les croire qu'il ne peut y avoir de réparations , la loi sur l'esclavage comme crime contre l' humanité n'étant pas une loi, pour reprendre un attendu d'un arrêt de leur cour de cassation du 5 février 2013, normative qui peut servir de fondement légal à une poursuite pour apologie ou pour tout autre motif certainement . Toujours engoncé dans une grandiloquence d'un autre temps qui malheureusement pour lui ne manipule plus,, le président français François Hollande a utilisé Césaire le martiniquais dont la détermination anti-colonialiste est simplement restée poétique pour affirmer « l’impossible réparation » des traites négrières et de l’esclavage et a prôné « la paix des mémoires réconciliées » auxquelles il faut « donner un avenir ».« Le seul choix possible, le plus digne, le plus grand, c’est la mémoire, la vigilance et la transmission ». Le mémorial act qu'il veut financer en Guadeloupe n'est manifestement pas le nom pour désigner tout monument pour apaiser l'esprit de ces milliers de femmes et d'hommes si injustement traités qui continuent de souffrir. Nous sommes partisans d'un mausolée ouvert sur la mer avec le nom de toutes et de tous . Un nouveau charabia est donc inventé pour tromper et tenter de faire oublier .

N'en déplaise aux français, nous n'oublierons jamais le calvaire qu'ils nous ont fait subir .Haïti que l'état français a contraint à payer pour son indépendance , aujourd'hui est le symbole de cet acharnement contre la liberté, la dignité et le droit au développement collectif .Les amérindiens propriétaires de cette terre qui ont subi un génocide dont ils ne se sont jamais relevés ne doive,t pas rester les oubliés de la réparation . Les français qui font assaut de belles paroles pour échapper à la nécessaire opprobre refusent toujours de ratifier la convention internationale sur les peuples autochtones qui tente de régler leur sort . Les peuples et l'état qui les représente doivent savoir que rien n'est impossible et que le retour du passé est toujours possible .

Notre démarche pour les réparations se déploie dans deux directions :

◘Tout d'abord, des excuses officielles de la France , adressées clairement et sans détour . Selon le droit international les états se succèdent et sont responsables de ce que leurs prédécesseurs ont fait .Tout le reste n'est que du verbiage

◘Le deuxième geste qui est exigé est celui de l'indemnisation qui dans ce domaine ne peut être que collective . Exiger comme le font les tribunaux français des arbres généalogiques pour continuer les poursuites et condamner est scandaleux compte tenu de l'histoire . C'est un tribunal pénal international institué dans le cadre des Nations unies qui doit juger pour condamner les représentants de ceux qui ont fauté y compris les dirigeants de certains états africains et déterminer le montant des indemnisations et leur destination .

Le combat pour la condamnation et l 'indemnisation de la traite , de l'esclavage et de l'exploitation coloniale doit donc continuer et s'accélérer.Il ne sera gagné que si nos soeurs et nos frères s'unissent .


*****

Daily Herald



MARIGOT--The 165th anniversary of the Abolition of Slavery was commemorated at a ceremony held at the Lady Liberty statue in Agrément on Monday with a programme of official speeches, interspersed with theatrical skits from a dark period in history with actors posing as slaves.

Fortunately the weather remained fine and sunny for the outdoor ceremony although dignitaries were seated under a tent should rain have fallen.

Préfet Philippe Chopin, Senator Louis-Constant Fleming, and Parliamentarian Daniel Gibbs, were present joining President Aline Hanson, her Vice-Presidents, the Territorial Council, and Presidents of the District Councils and Culture Associations.

The programme was opened by Natisha Hanson who sang an interpretation of Bob Marley's Redemption Song." She also closed the ceremony with a rendition of the St. Martin Song.

Short addresses to mark the occasion were given by Préfet Chopin and President Hanson who also read out a message from President of the French Republic François Hollande.

"Our children must know what happened in the past," she said. "Here in St. Martin they must know the various areas where cultivation took place and who the families were who were brought in from Africa to work. We have to make sure slavery never happens again, that human beings are never exploited. We are all equal and humanity must be respected."

The theatrical programme was once again well organised by the Collectivité's Arts and Culture Department. The roundabout was decorated with props and authentic items that would have been used during the period on plantations or in the home.

The first segment directed by Melissa Fleming and Romaric Benjamin from One Poet Society had actors as slaves dressed in period costume being beaten by the plantation owner for trying to escape, and then forced back to work cutting the sugar cane. Finally the slaves rejoice after learning of their freedom.

Another entertaining exchange between a local woman (played by Reinette Petit) and a fish seller (played by Patou from Youth Waves) drew laughter from the audience.

Gwoka drum music to accompany the performances was provided by Hélié and Company.

President of the Nature Valley Colombier Association, Vernicia Brooks, then read out an ancestral roll call of names from the region and St. Martin, to remind people that those persons, not slaves, fought for rights in their communities and who have passed on.

"We have a tendency to forget them and this was a reminder," Brooks explained.

A minute's silence to remember the slavery period concluded the ceremony.


*****

Dutch Parliament debates 

on slavery past, formal apology

Amigoe


THE HAGUE--Members of the Second Chamber of the Dutch Parliament, experts, representatives of various social organisations and members of the Antillean and Surinamese communities discussed the Dutch slavery past on Thursday.

The meeting can be considered historical because it was the Dutch Parliament that formalised the concession for the Dutch West India Company (WIC), set up in 1621, to engage in slave trade, which started in 1665 with the recognition of the Antillean islands and the establishment of the claim to colonial rights over the Wild Coast (Suriname, Berbice, and Essequibo-Demarary).

The WIC transported some 273,000 slaves from Africa to the Americas between 1621 and 1730. In total the Dutch companies transported about 600,000 slaves between 1601 and 1803 and some 90,000 slaves died on board the Dutch slave ships.

The Dutch Parliament also was the setting where the discussion took place about compensation for the plantation owners on the abolition of slavery in the former colonies, the Antilles and Suriname. The Dutch abolished slavery on July 1, 1863, as one of the very last countries in Europe to emancipate its slaves.

More than 300 years after the first ships left The Netherlands to collect slaves on the West African coast, the Christian Union (CU) took the initiative to organise a consultation with members of the African Diaspora in The Netherlands to discuss this aspect of shared history on the eve of the official commemoration in Amsterdam this Monday in the presence of King Willem-Alexander and Queen Máxima.

The CU and its leader Arie Slob, who chaired Thursday's consultation, were commended. "You took a courageous step," said National Platform Slavery Past Chairperson Barryl Biekman. She pointed out that the Dutch Government had shied away from this topic for a long time. There also was praise for Second Chamber Member Harry van Bommel of the Socialist Party (SP) who has brought up the topic several times in past years.

Second Chamber President Anouchka van Miltenburg gave the official opening words. "We want to see our country in the role of pioneer. Yet, we were not in the lead in abolishing slavery and it also took a long time before we started talking about it. That attitude has caused a feeling among the descendants that history has been falsified," she said.

Several Members of Parliament (MPs) attended the consultation.

Many in the Surinamese and Antillean communities are hoping for a formal apology from the Dutch State, formally headed by the King, for the slave trade in the 17th and 18th centuries. It was a topic that dominated Thursday's meeting.

Chairperson of the National Committee that coordinates the commemoration of the abolition of slavery Joan Ferrier pointed out in her ardent plea for a formal apology that other countries already had done so in the past.

"The Dutch State needs to recognise what has taken place. It is about a psychological gratification for the descendants of slaves," she said. "Deep expression of regret is essential. The slavery past is a great emotional burden. It is of national importance that justification is done to this part of history."

Consultative Body for Dutch Caribbean persons in The Netherlands OCAN Chairman Glenn Helberg said a formal apology was the first step, and should be followed by reconciliation and a broad dialogue on this shared history. Part of the process is dealing with the "collective trauma" of the slavery past and "superiority feeling," the source of slave trade. The superiority feeling also leads to racism and discrimination, and that vicious circle has to be broken, he added.

According to Helberg, not only the Dutch Government, but the Second Chamber too has a role to play. Parliament needs to take responsibility, show respect and take a stand on this issue, he said. "We should recognise that slavery was a crime against humanity. Let's look at our mindset, reconcile and work on a joint future."

Poet and theatrical producer Quinsy Gario of St. Maarten said recognition started by acknowledging that The Netherlands was a multicultural society where people of African descent had as many opportunities as native Dutch people. Recognition of what really happened during the times of the slave trade was also important, he said. Furthermore, discrimination and racism today should be tackled by issuing serious fines and punishments.

Mitchell Esajas of the New Urban Collective youth action group and Caribbean history expert Alex van Stipriaan also made a case for a formal apology of the State.

"Youngsters need that piece of recognition so they can make something of themselves. Apologies are needed to solve this issue," said Esajas.

"The Dutch Government absolutely has to apologise, accompanied by a gesture. It shouldn't be an empty gesture," said Van Stipriaan.

MP Van Bommel (SP) said he was a fierce advocate of formal apologies. "We have to take responsibility for the past and present. We, the people in this room, were not actually there during the times of slavery, but we are part of the heritage of slave traders. It is important to talk about it, because slavery is a red wire through our history," he said.

MP Pierre Heijnen of the Labour Party PvdA said that although The Netherlands had a "great responsibility for this gross violation and crime" it was important to get out of the victim and perpetrator roles, because otherwise the process of reconciliation and getting rid of the superiority feeling would take even longer. "Let's not keep dancing around this totem pole. Cooperation, working on a future together is more important," he said.




"Tax haven" status doesn't sit well in Gibraltar


Our Sovereignty More Important than
UK Tax Concerns!


Through The Looking glass

by LEO OLIVERO
"...it was inappropriate for the UK to have summoned Gibraltar the way it did, and then dump the Rock with other territories who are known to have a far less and inferior legal financial regime."

operationworld.org

The Foreign Office present policy of doing little in putting an end to the now daily event of Spanish state vessels ‘systematically invading our waters’ is creating an uneasy tension and discontent amongst many in the community who believe London is not doing nearly enough to protect Gibraltar’s interest!


Tax Haven Leaders Called to Downing Street! 

Over the weekend the Chief Minister responded to the call by UK Prime Minister David Cameron to attend a meeting with other leaders of overseas territories and dependents. 

This is an issue I personally questioned a few weeks ago…I was unhappy the CM was invited on the basis that he was, which came under the same negative public headlines received by other small UK offshore centres who have not done half as much as Gibraltar to clean up its act and distance itself from the Tax Haven Label. Many of our offshore peer jurisdictions have not even caught with the Rock which is miles ahead! 

The UK and international press helped by the Downing Street press machine spun an effective yarn, highlighting how Cameron had managed to firstly ‘summons and then convince all the UK tax havens (Gibraltar included) scattered all over planet to play ball and fall in line with the rest of the world on the negative tax problems’ which hypocritically nations like the USA, Germany, France, Spain and the UK themselves now want to eradicate!

Frankly I believe Gibraltar having attended to Mr Cameron’s call (in the manner it did) did not in my view gained anything positive from it, in fact on the contrary. There was a constant flow (especially from Spain) of negative press surrounding the news, mostly directed at the overseas and dependent territories…every nation who attended was painted with the same tax haven brush. If there was anything positive it obviously went to Mr Cameron for taking the initiative, this is how the Downing Street spin machine were successful in portraying before the G8 meeting kicked off. 

The British Prime Minister David Cameron spent the best part of last month anxiously running round working overtime attempting to persuade or may be insist that the small cluster of nations that form part of the UK’s overseas territories and crown dependencies do more to clamp down on tax evasion and avoidance in their respective jurisdictions.

Cameron’s late surge was all part of an urgent rushed plan by Downing Street in order to make progress in closing so called tax loopholes before the UK played host to a meeting of G8 leaders in Belfast this Monday and Tuesday which Mr Cameron chaired.

Government Right To Back Cameron Call But Not The Way It Was Arranged! 

Quite rightly the Gibraltar Government backed Mr Cameron’s call for transparency in the British Dependent Overseas Territories. Cameron was keen to highlight Britain’s position in fighting tax evasion and aggressive tax avoidance through tax information exchange and access to information on beneficial ownership of companies. A beaming Prime Minister later described it as “a very positive step forward and it means that Britain’s voice in the G8 and the campaigning on this issue around the world for proper taxes, proper companies and proper laws ... will be stronger.”

My main concern with the whole Cameron (overseas leaders) initiative is that it was inappropriate for the UK to have summoned Gibraltar the way it did, and then dump the Rock with other territories who are known to have a far less and inferior legal financial regime. In this respect Downing Street was out of line. …The implications flying everywhere about this meeting and reported by the world press was one that Gibraltar and others who attended Cameron’s calling, were somehow acting in an inappropriate manner and need to be held to account!

Some countries believe the Cameron initiative was rooted in a level of hypocrisy, particularly when you think many of the bigger nations including the UK and USA… The latter has its own suspect if less well-known suspect onshore practices in jurisdictions such as Delaware in the old U S of A.

And here we have Gibraltar who has ploughed ahead with its own financial reforms and complied with most international measures. The Rock is also up to date with all pertinent EU directives. Gibraltar has committed to the OECD standard having entered into 26 Tax Information Exchange Agreements (TIEA) with numerous nations across the globe. I heard none of this over the weekend from any of the 

UK or international press
Like I said earlier there is no criticism levelled (sic) at the Chief Minister for having attended Mr Cameron’s meeting in the UK capital. Although if the UK Prime Minister really wanted to heap public praise on the leadership of the Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies for their efforts in fighting tax evasion and fraud as has been reported he said. Mr Cameron or his press people could have done it very differently, instead of creating a totally negative world press when inviting the leaders of (of so called tax havens) and just before a G8 meeting to give it even more negative publicity!

Frankly I am not convinced at all about the sudden fuss on the tax issue by the biggest industrialised nations who make the G8 gang, even if they are pushing for global reform in the most dodgiest financial corners of the world. It looks more like an attempt to marginalise smaller, less powerful, territories like Gibraltar and others. Ironically even after the first day of the G8 get together in Belfast on Monday, the G8 are having difficulties in agreeing amongst themselves these important tax matters they impose on other nations! 

Our Sovereignty More Important Than The UK’s Tax Concerns! (sovereignty? As a British dependency? - OTR) 

Whilst the British Government works flat out leaving no stone unturned in an attempt to lead the way in ridding the world of tax havens and aggressive tax cheats… Gibraltar continues alone it seems with its on-going battle and growing concerns as a nation. 

The concerns of the people of Gibraltar are not about offshore taxes, important as they may be to others. Our anxieties go deeper than taxes and money. Ours is about our future our identity as a people in the form of our right to our sovereignty, our land and the waters that surround us and importantly… the right to determine our future!

Our concerns are also about dealing with a ‘hostile neighbour’ who on a daily basis invades our waters with impunity ‘because of the zero response by the administering power’ the United Kingdom. The same United Kingdom and the same administering power who only a few days ago publicly brought to-book ten overseas territories and crown dependencies including Gibraltar for not doing enough it seems regarding tax evasion!

The ironic situation now is that the same ‘Administering Power in London ‘continuous to ignore and play down its own obligations to defend the people of Gibraltar from a hostile neighbour in the form of the Kingdom of Spain. The UK’s obligations to Gibraltar are clearly written in the Constitution, it is law. These obligations at the moment and where it matters… is nowhere to be seen! 

There’s no doubt the United Kingdom by way of the Foreign Office is letting Gibraltar down by allowing the Spanish Government to consolidate its own agenda of intimidation and threats…making our lives a continuous (worrying) misery not only at sea but also by land at the frontier - daily! 

The latest incursion by the Spanish warship ‘P64 Tarifa’ last week generated another futile diplomatic protest by the Foreign Office, coupled with the 56 recorded illegal incursions or invasions by Spanish state vessels between the 12 May to 11 June which now must be over 70 if the long weekend figures are included. 

The Situation is ‘Out of Control’ 

The invasion (or foreign office definition - incursions) are now out of control, its reached that point because it is simple not controlled. When issues or incidents of this nature are not tackled effectively or not at all ‘they inevitable get out of control’… Basic Logic! 

The foreign office when take the familiar shallow-line of “All unlawful incursions are challenged by Gibraltar Squadron and all are subject to a diplomatic protest” this is a farcical statement for quite a few reasons!

The Real Challenge Not From the UK
Where is the physical evidence that the continuous Spanish invasion of our waters is being challenged by the Gib Squadron or anyone else in the true sense of the word? 

According to my dictionary ‘to challenge something or someone’ is to engage in a contest, fight. An act or statement of defiance; a call to confrontation, if you tone the definition down even further it also means “determination to deal with or achieve something”… the latter sentiment is completely absent under the current FCO Policy!

The only visible or real challenge is the one presented daily by Spanish state vessels which the Foreign Office appears inept in effectively engaging!

As I reported last week the situation looks to be getting worse, more serious and deteriorating as the Spanish invasion into BGTW increases. With the latter scenario the level of danger obviously increases, more so in the summer months as more members of the public youngsters in particular, venture out into the bay or other areas of local waters. 

I hope I am wrong, but I have little doubt there will be more than one incident in BGTW involving the public and a spanish state vessel that will hit local headlines, this before the summer ends! 

Losing Faith in the FCO! 

Personally, I am quickly losing all faith with the FCO especially with their present lukewarm policy. When you hear a statement like the one last week by the Europe Minister David Lidington when he said “Spanish incursions do not pose a credible threat to Gibraltar’s security or defence” you begin to wonder if the Foreign Office have lost the plot in their misguided desire to be over, under or to diplomatic with the Spaniards and under-achievers for Gibraltar!

We were also informed over the weekend that David Cameron had confirmed he remained “staunchly supportive” of the international legal status of BGTW as unquestionably British, which was unaffected by the repeated incursions by Spain.” This remark is like the one the UK continuously repeats that they are ‘confident’ about the legal status of the waters.

These words mean very little at the moment... You can be staunchly supportive and confident as the UK say they are…But what use are words when they are not supported by some tangible commitment. Words in the wind get easily blown away, particularly with Gibraltar’s strong levanter which is known to whip up a strong breeze!

Are We Prepared to do Anything? 

I end by turning to the people of Gibraltar; I have made similar remarks many times before. 

As a small nation (?), we moan, groan and criticise everything under the sun… but do very little for ourselves.

We cannot expect others do everything for us, or as we would like. If we are not prepared ourselves to go out of our way to demonstrate our feelings and beliefs in a manner, which would leave no uncertainties how we truly feel as a society!