20 January 2016

New Argentina Government remains firm to sovereignty over Malvinas


Latin Correspondent logo


Argentina enforces supremacy over Falklands, inviting UK to resume negotiations

On January 3, the 183 anniversary of the British occupation of the Falkland Islands, the Argentine Government reiterated their claims regarding the sovereignty of the archipelago, located in the South Atlantic – but the UK has not been swayed and remain stuck firmly to their guns.
It comes as Argentina’s new president Mauricio Macri demanded the UK enter talks over the “unlawful” Falklands occupation as he slighted David Cameron’s call for a “more mature relationship”.
Relations between the two countries have been strained by former president Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner, and it had been hoped that Macri’s presidency would inspire in a period of improved relations.
“On January 3, 1833, the Falkland Islands were occupied by British forces that evacuated the population and the Argentine authorities legitimately established there and replaced them by subjects of the occupying power”, recalled the Argentine Foreign Ministry in a statement.
“The Republic of Argentina immediately protested this act of illegitimate force that is still without consent at any time,” it continued.
The executive also said that the Argentina Constitution, “enshrines the permanent and inalienable objective of recovering the full exercise of sovereignty over these territories and maritime areas, in accordance with the principles of international law and respecting the way of life of the inhabitants of the Falkland Islands”.
United Nations laws
The statement also noted that 2015 marked the 50th anniversary of the adoption of the United Nations clause that recognized the case of the archipelago as one of colonialism, and that “for decades” the international community has urged Argentina and the UK “to find  a peaceful and lasting solution” to bilateral negotiations “as soon as possible”.
“Argentina renews its firm commitment to the peaceful settlement of disputes, international law and multilateralism and invites the United Kingdom to resume negotiations to resolve the matter as soon as possible, and fairly and definitively dispute sovereignty “, concluded the Foreign Ministry.
What does Britain say?
In the Prime Minister’s Christmas message to the Falkland Islands, David Cameron expressed hope that Mr Macri’s election would “allow us to move towards a more mature relationship”.
“We are very clear that the sovereignty of the Falkland Islands should be determined by the Islanders and they expressed their view very clearly in the recent referendum,” said a Downing Street spokesperson on Tuesday, January 5.
Asked if the Prime Minister was disappointed by the Argentine government’s statement, she added: “The statement talks about how our countries should work together to address a range of issues, not just the Falklands Islands but in the broader region.
“We need to now see what those talks lead to … where we can develop a constructive relationship.
“The Prime Minister spoke to the new president at the end of the year.
“They agreed they want to look at ways we can have a more constructive relationship.”
Argentina and Britain fought a war over the sovereignty of the islands in 1982 when Argentine troops landed on the islands.
In the conflict, which ended with the surrender of Argentina in June of that same year, 255 British, 649 Argentine and three islanders died.
In March 2013 a referendum was carried out on the island which was not recognized by the Argentine government. The population of the Falklands decided by a large majority – 99.8% to be exact- to remain a British overseas territory.

See the Falkland Island historical account here.



19 January 2016

Argentina on 1833 Usurpation of the Malvinas Islands



Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Worship of Argentina on the occasion of the 183rd anniversary of the usurpation of the Malvinas Islands by the United Kingdom 
marked on 3rd January 2016




 "On 3 January 1833, the Malvinas Islands were occupied by British forces, which evicted the Argentine population and authorities lawfully established there and replaced them with subjects of the occupying Power. 

The Argentine Republic immediately protested that illegitimate act of force, which continues today and to which it never consented. Since its beginnings as an independent nation, the Argentine Republic has, through government acts, publicly expressed its political resolve to exercise its effective sovereignty over the southern territories and maritime areas which it inherited from Spain. 

Today, 183 years after the start of that illegal occupation, which is still continuing, the Argentine people and Government reaffirm once again the inalienable sovereignty rights of the Argentine Republic over the Malvinas Islands, South Georgia Islands and South Sandwich Islands and the surrounding maritime areas. 

The permanent and unrenounceable objective of recovering the full exercise of sovereignty over these territories and maritime areas, in accordance with the principles of international law, while respecting the way of life of the inhabitants of the Malvinas Islands is enshrined in the first transitional provision of the national Constitution. 

This objective is a State policy and reflects the collective desire of the entire Argentine people. Last year marked the fiftieth anniversary of the adoption of United Nations General Assembly resolution 2065 (XX), the first resolution to refer specifically to the question of the Malvinas Islands, which was endorsed in all subsequent resolutions on the matter adopted by the Assembly and its Special Committee on decolonization. 

For decades, the international community has singled out the question of the Malvinas Islands as one of the forms of colonialism that must be brought to an end and has urged Argentina and the United Kingdom to find, as soon as possible, a peaceful and lasting solution to the sovereignty dispute, through bilateral negotiations. 

Our region has unanimously rejected the British military presence in the South Atlantic and has expressed its concern through a variety of pronouncements at the presidential summits of the Southern Common Market (MERCOSUR) States parties and associated States, of the Union of South American Nations (UNASUR) and of the Community of Latin American and Caribbean States (CELAC), and at the Ibero - American Summit. Other regions have also expressed their support for the resumption of negotiations at forums such as the South American and Arab Countries Summit and the Africa-South America Summit.

Additionally, the Group of 77 and China has expressly recognized the right of the Argentine Republic to take legal action, with full respect for international law and relevant resolutions, against unauthorized hydrocarbon exploration and exploitation activities in its maritime areas, which include the continental shelf. 

Fifty years after the adoption of General Assembly resolution 2065 (XX), the Argentine Republic renews its firm commitment to the peaceful settlement of disputes, international law and multilateralism. It invites the United Kingdom to resume negotiations in order to find, as soon as possible, a just and definitive solution to the sovereignty dispute over the Malvinas Islands, South Georgia Islands and South Sandwich Islands and the surrounding maritime areas, taking the path of dialogue, peace and diplomacy in line with the calls of the international community.” 

18 January 2016

Martin Luther King - Beyond Vietnam (1967)

"A true revolution of values will lay hands on the world order and say of war: This way of settling differences is not just." -  Martin Luther King


Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King
April 4, 1967
Riverside Church
New York, N.Y.

Mr. Chairman, ladies and gentlemen, I need not pause to say how very delighted I am to be here tonight, and how very delighted I am to see you expressing your concern about the issues that will be discussed tonight by turning out in such large numbers. I also want to say that I consider it a great honor to share this program with Dr. Bennett, Dr. Commager, and Rabbi Heschel, some of the distinguished leaders and personalities of our nation. And of course it’s always good to come back to Riverside Church. Over the last eight years, I have had the privilege of preaching here almost every year in that period, and it is always a rich and rewarding experience to come to this great church and this great pulpit. 

I come to this magnificent house of worship tonight because my conscience leaves me no other choice. I join you in this meeting because I am in deepest agreement with the aims and work of the organization which has brought us together, Clergy and Laymen Concerned About Vietnam. The recent statements of your executive committee are the sentiments of my own heart, and I found myself in full accord when I read its opening lines: "A time comes when silence is betrayal." That time has come for us in relation to Vietnam. 

The truth of these words is beyond doubt, but the mission to which they call us is a most difficult one. Even when pressed by the demands of inner truth, men do not easily assume the task of opposing their government’s policy, especially in time of war. Nor does the human spirit move without great difficulty against all the apathy of conformist thought within one’s own bosom and in the surrounding world. Moreover, when the issues at hand seem as perplexing as they often do in the case of this dreadful conflict, we are always on the verge of being mesmerized by uncertainty. But we must move on.

READ THE FULL ADDRESS AT THE LINK ABOVE.

SEE ALSO: 

Newly Discovered 1964 MLK Speech on Civil Rights, Segregation & Apartheid South Africa

15 January 2016

Catalonia takes steps to implement plan for secession from Spain





BARCELONA – The Parliament of Catalonia elected Carles Puigdemont on Sunday as its new regional president, backed by groups that support the separatist agenda, in a plenary where he made clear his determination to achieve independence for this region of Spain.

Puigdemont was elected with an absolute majority of 70 votes in favor – 62 from the coalition Junts Pel Si (JxSi) and eight from radical leftist party CUP – and 63 votes against.

Two members of the radical CUP (10 MPs) party abstained from voting.

Puigdemont’s investiture was held Sunday, two hours from the expiry of the deadline for new elections to be convened automatically, following the resignation of former regional president Artur Mas and an agreement in extremis signed Saturday between JxSi and CUP.

The Jxsi coalition, formed by heterogeneous political groups, was the most voted in regional elections but needed the votes of the CUP to push their candidate and proceed with the separatist agenda.

The government presented Sunday by Puigdemont during his investiture traces back to the one presented by Mas in a failed plenary few months ago, and provides for the creation of Catalonia’s own Treasury, a central bank of Catalonia and even its own customs.

Leader of the opposition, Citizens party’s Ines Arrimadas accused the new Catalan executive of heading an illegal project, while the Socialist Miquel Iceta lashed out at Puigdemont saying “No to independence, illegality and his investiture.”

Spanish Prime Minister Mariano Rajoy responded to Puigdemont’s election with a promise to comply with his obligation to ensure the law and Constitution faced with the separatist challenge, warning, he “won’t allow a single act that could harm the unity and sovereignty of Spain.”

“We have more tools than ever to defend our unity, we, the main political forces agree on this,” said Rajoy, who received the backing of socialist opposition leader Pedro Sanchez, and Citizens party president, Albert Rivera, who heads the fourth political force in the Spanish Congress.

This new chapter has stoked the national debate over the formation of a new Spanish Executive, where the Catalan issue is one of the “red lines” for the possible pacts to form a government, in a political atmosphere marked by uncertainty and lack of parliamentary majority.

14 January 2016

UN EXPERT GROUP ON PEOPLE OF AFRICAN DESCENT TO VISIT U.S. ON FACT FINDING MISSION

US Human Rights Network
WILL VISIT FIVE CITIES INCLUDING WASHINGTON, D.C.
 
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: January 14, 2015
CONTACT: Jess St. Louis, USHRN,
404-588-9763 x104
WASHINGTON, DC – From January 19th to the 29th, the United Nations Working Group of Experts on People of African Descent is visiting the United States on a fact-finding mission concerning the human rights of people of African descent. This is the second visit from the Working Group, who also visited the U.S. in 2010. The Working Group experts will be meeting with government officials, non-governmental organizations, and people of African descent to examine and make recommendations on the situation of people of African descent in the United States. The Working Group visit comes before the United States undergoes a follow up review by the UN Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (CERD) in April 2016. 
The 10-day visit will begin and conclude in Washington, DC and will include visits to Baltimore, MD, Jackson, MS, Chicago, IL and New York City. In addition, the Working Group has requested access to detention facilities in order to hear the experiences of incarcerated people of African descent. "We are pleased to help coordinate the Working Group's meetings with civil society and heartened that the visit includes a stop in the oft-neglected South particularly as it relates to people of African descent" said Ejim Dike, Executive Director of the US Human Rights Network. "We hope that the Working Group experts will also focus specifically on people of African descent who experience multiple forms of discrimination due to their gender, gender identity, sexual orientation, immigration status, and/or disability status," she continued.
"We are very optimistic about the Working Group's visit to Washington DC,” states Pan African Community Action organizer Adwoa Masozi. “In this nation’s capital, affectionately known as Chocolate City, because of its majority population of African descendants, exposing conditions like mass displacement from gentrification and the killing of Black people here by police helps highlight the inability of thegovernment to provide redress.”
"We are in a moment where Chicago and the US government have an opportunity to be a model for the world and UN in respecting, protecting and fulfilling the economic, social, and cultural rights of African Descendants in America,“ said Willie JR Fleming, director of the Chicago Anti-Eviction Campaign. “Because of the public awareness and protests around black youth unemployment, homelessness, poverty, police killings of unarmed blacks, and daily crimes against humanity happening to blacks by government and their private contractors, we must recognize this opportunity given to us.”
Three of the five Working Group experts will be participating in the visit: Ms. Mirelle Fanon-Mendez-France (Chairperson, France), Mr. Sabelo Gumedze (South Africa), and Ricardo A. Sunga (Phillipines). On January 29th, the working group will hold a press conference detailing their preliminary findings.  
####
ABOUT THE US HUMAN RIGHTS NETWORK 
The US Human Rights Network (USHRN) is a national network of organizations and individuals working to strengthen a human rights movement and culture within the United States led by the people most directly impacted by human rights violations. It is a network of over 300 organizational members that is working to popularize human rights in communities across the United States in order to secure dignity and justice 

13 January 2016

Samoa Prime Minister critiques American Samoa's political status


By

Joyetter Feagaimaalii-Luamanu


APIA, SAMOA — American Samoa “has the worst kind of relationship that any country can have with America,” says Samoa’s Prime Minister Tuilaepa Sailele Malielegaoi in an exclusive interview at his office last week. He was talking about the territory’s political status of “Unorganized and Unincorporated” after Samoa News had asked him about ASG showing interest in Samoa’s “Citizen by Investment” law during the Inter Samoa Talks.

According to the bill, which was detailed in the Samoa Observer, a citizen from any country who is willing to invest a million tala in Samoa — after a series of checks outlined in the Bill — could become a citizen three years after, and eventually, he/she could own land in Samoa.

Tuilaepa stated that American Samoa wouldn’t be able to have a similar bill because the territory doesn’t have the freedom to do so. Samoa’s Prime Minister said there is a limit to ASG’s freedom, and that’s why the current governor and former governor both urged looking at the political status to see if it’s feasible to alter the status “to have a degree of independence through special relationships, with America.”

He further stated that it’s up to ASG and the people of American Samoa to decide for the future because American Samoa (as well as Puerto Rico) needs to “shape up” its current political status.

“You need people with courage and foresight to look very carefully into the existing relationship — whether you are satisfied. The way I see it, it is the worst relations that any country can have with America. You are always on the bad end, but your people seem to like what you get and that is what you’ll have ‘til kingdom comes — if you continue in the relationship.”

BACKGROUND

During the Samoa talks held in American Samoa last month, American Samoa was interested in learning more about Samoa’s “Citizen by Investment” law. During the Talks, American Samoa acknowledged the progress Samoa has made in its “Citizen by Investment” law and was interested to learn more about how Samoa is marketing the program to prospective investors/citizens. Currently American Samoa has an existing law allowing and facilitating foreign investments but it is not tied to citizenship or permanent resident status.


06 January 2016

U.N. Group of Experts on People of African Descent to visit U.S.




Overview of Working Group: The Working Group of Experts on People of African Descent is a UN body of experts dedicated to improving the human rights situation of people of African descent in the Diaspora. One of their mandates is to visit different countries to examine critically the situation of people of African descent in the country, identify problems, and make recommendations for resolution of the problems. 

To fulfill its mandate, the Working Group of Experts on People of African Descent undertakes country visits; holds two annual sessions; responds to information and allegations received concerning its mandate under the Communications procedure; and reports to United Nations Human Rights Council and the General Assembly on activities relating to the mandate.


Mandate: 

To study the problems of racial discrimination faced by people of African descent living in the Diaspora and, to that end, gather all relevant information from Governments, non-governmental organizations and other relevant sources, including through the holding of public meetings with them;

To propose measures to ensure full and effective access to the justice system by people of African descent;

To submit recommendations on the design, implementation and enforcement of effective measures to eliminate racial profiling of people of African descent;

To make proposals on the elimination of racial discrimination against Africans and people of African descent in all parts of the world;

To address all the issues concerning the well-being of Africans and people of African descent contained in the Durban Declaration and Program of Action;

To elaborate on proposals for the elimination of racial discrimination against people of African descent, bearing in mind the need for close collaboration with international and development institutions and the specialized agencies of the United Nations system to promote the human rights of people of African descent, as well as other affirmative or positive measures and strategies within the human rights framework

Country Visits:

These visits provide an opportunity to examine in detail the situation of people of African descent in the country, to identify any problems and to make recommendations for how these could be resolved. By the nature of the mandate, the Working Group is required to look critically at the situation in a country and also identify good practices that could be replicated in other countries. The visits are intended to provide an independent and impartial assessment which will then be of use to all actors.

What happens during a country visit?

The Working Group meets with the heads of State and of Government, with relevant Government ministers, representatives of independent human rights institutions, UN agencies, civil society, academia, the media, human rights defenders, people of African descent, among others. The Working Group will usually begin a visit in the capital city and then continue with visits to other cities or towns, as well as to rural areas of particular relevance to the role and situation of people of African descent.

What sort of information is gathered during a visit?

The Working Group will gather the following types of information: any forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia, afrophobia and related intolerance faced by people of African descent; measures taken to prevent racial discrimination and protect victims of racism and hate crimes; mechanisms for the protection, integration and inclusion of migrants and refugees; responses to multiple forms of discrimination that specific groups of African descent may face and the efforts undertaken by the authorities to protect people of African descent from violations.

What happens after the visit?

At the end of the visit the Working Group holds a media conference and issues a press release with its preliminary findings and recommendations. The Working Group releases a mission report indicating, among other things, the main concerns and recommendations for action. The report is presented formally by the Working Group to the Human Rights Council.

Overview of the US Visit: The UN WGEPAD will conduct an official visit to the United States January 18-January 29, 2016. 

The group will spend two days in Washington, DC at the beginning of their trip and will conclude their trip in Washington, DC on January 27-29. In addition to visiting Washington, DC the group’s trip will include visits to four additional communities in the United States. They will visit Baltimore, Maryland in the Mid-Atlantic region, Chicago, Illinois and Ferguson, Missouri in the Midwest region, and Jackson, Mississippi in the South. 

They will also be visiting detention facilities during their visit to gather information on the experiences of incarcerated people of African descent. 

Members of the Working Group:

There are five members of the Working Group. The following members of the Working Group will participate in the US visit:

(Chairperson, France) 
(South Africa)
(Philippines)


01 January 2016

University of West Indies to hold conference on Pan Africanism

Hosting institutions: The University of the West Indies, Cave Hill Campus (Barbados) - Department of History and Philosophy and the Department of Government, Sociology and Social Work; and Pan African Strategic and Policy Research Group (PANAFSTRAG) In association with: Fahamu, Nairobi Kenya



Theme: “Heroines and heroes of the back to Africa movements, Pan Africanism, African nationalism and global Africanism: Their philosophies, activities and legacies”


January 12 – 15, 2016 

The Departments of History and Philosophy; Government, Sociology and Social Work, The University of the West Indies, Cave Hill Campus, Barbados and PANAFSTRAG are pleased to issue this call for papers for this inaugural international Pan African Colloquium to be held at The University of the West Indies, Cave Hill Campus, Barbados over the period January 12-15, 2016. The broad theme for this inaugural colloquium will be “Heroes and heroines of the back to Africa movements, Pan Africanism, African nationalism and global Africanism: Their philosophies, activities and legacies.”

This international conference hopes to brings together scholars/researchers, activists and policy makers to interrogate the philosophical, political, socio-cultural and economic thoughts and legacies of these Africanists. Since the nineteenth century these persons have agitated and protested against imperialism, emancipation, racism, violation of human rights and inequality of economic opportunity, conditions that still characterize our reality. 

This conference provides a platform for the exploration of such issues and the questions related to the viability of Africanist movements. Interrelated issues of solidarity, self-determination, self-awareness, black consciousness, economic empowerment, spiritual enlightenment and cultural awareness will also be discussed. The conference is further intended to build synergies and forge dialogue on how the movement in Africa and the African diaspora can improve its position in a globalizing world and aid in shaping consciousness of Africans worldwide building on the efforts of these heroes and heroines.


23 December 2015

SEASONS GREETINGS FROM OVERSEAS TERRITORIES REVIEW



Saipan, Northern Mariana Islands (photo by OTR)

The Editors, staff and interns of Overseas Territories Review extend best wishes to our readers for the holiday season
and for the New Year !










St. Croix, Virgin Islands (photo by OTR)









All the Best!


OTR





22 December 2015

The unfinished business of total liberation - Africa’s islands

Akyaaba Addai-Sebo

It is generally held that decolonisation of Africa ended with the fall of apartheid in South Africa in 1994. But the truth is that Britain, France, Spain and Portugal continue to colonise a number African islands.

Dr. Kwame Nkrumah of Ghana was categorical in his thinking about the ‘liberation and unification’ of Africa. He left no doubt that the total ‘political and economic’ liberation and unification of Africa included all the islands of Africa in the Atlantic and Indian Oceans, the Red Sea and the Mediterranean Sea. To emphasise this and to ensure that posterity does not relinquish, by benign neglect, any territory of Africa, Nkrumah in his books used maps with annotated listings of Africa’s islands to etch in the consciousness of the reader the fact that these islands are integral to the imperative of Africa’s total liberation and unification. To Nkrumah, no African land mass must be under colonisation, trusteeship or be alienated from the cause of African unity.

As we mark the 50th anniversary of the founding of the Organisation of African Unity (OAU) and its Coordinating Committee for the Liberation of Africa (Liberation Committee), we must wake up to the fact that the United Kingdom, France, Spain and Portugal still hold a sizeable colony of islands in Africa’s territorial waters. It is refreshing, however, to note that some African countries, on their own, are laying claim to some of these ‘overseas possessions’ of these European ‘powers’.

As I write, it is ‘Not Yet Uhuru’ for the following islands: Ascension Island (United Kingdom); Saint Helena Island (United Kingdom); Tristan da Cunha Archipelago (United Kingdom); Bassas de India Atoll (France); Europa Island (France); Glorioso Islands (France); Iles Esparses (France); Juan de Nova Island (France); Mayotte Island (France); Reunion Island (France); Tromelin Island (France); Canary Islands (Spain); Ceuta (Spain) and Madeira (Portugal).

The disputed island territories are Bassas da India, Europa Island & Juan de Nova Island (Claimants: France and Madagascar. France claims sovereignty over these various uninhabited islands, and currently controls and protects them from its military base in nearby Réunion. They are in use as nature reserves and meteorological stations.); Glorioso (Glorieuses) Islands (Claimants: Comoros, France, Madagascar and the Seychelles. A nature reserve which is manned by French military forces; Mayotte (Claimants: Comoros and France. 

Operating as a French overseas collectivity since the 1970s, these islands are geographically part of the Comoros Islands, and just like their neighbours - the Glorioso Islands - they are also claimed by Comoros; Plazas de Soberanía (Claimants: Morocco and Spain. This is a collection of small Spanish-controlled city states and islands in North Africa, which all surround Morocco, and which have a combined total population of just over 140,000); Tromelin Island (Claimants: France, Mauritius and the Seychelles. France claims sovereignty over, and controls, this 1 mile long and mostly flat island, but Mauritius and the Seychelles both dispute the French ownership of this uninhabited isle) See disputed territories.

Nkrumah’s famous pronouncement that ‘...The independence of Ghana is meaningless unless it is linked up with the total liberation of the African continent’ also meant that the decolonisation of the African continent is meaningless unless it is linked to the total liberation of Africa’s islands.

Growing up in the 1950s and 1960s it was etched in our memories that ‘Africa without Madagascar was like a table without a chair; was like a tree without a trunk; was like a hand without fingers’; and such like puns that we would spin out of our heads as we played around in song, dance and games. This was the catechism of total liberation and unification in singsong rhymes which made the task of Africa’s decolonisation our conscious responsibility to prosecute ‘by any means necessary’. The core of this task was and has always been the ‘decolonisation of the mind’ from ‘mental slavery’ with due respect to NgÅ©gÄ© wa Thiong’o and Bob Marley.

This is what Nkrumah purposely set out to achieve with the setting up of an ideological institute and the Young Pioneers Movement. I was a proud Young Pioneer and when the army and the police struck on 24 February 1966 to overthrow the Nkrumah regime I had the presence of mind then to mobilise my fellow young pioneers at school to march into town to resist. We therefore remain colonised in mind, body and soul if we can alienate our islands from our collective consciousness while our Heads of State in a summit session duly dissolved the OAU Liberation Committee in June 1994 at Tunis. South Africa was our last settler colony to be liberated but in reality this is not so, as the pun ‘Africa without Madagascar...’ still rings true, with some of our islands still under colonial domination. 

The Heads of State at the summit in Tunis recognised that ‘the mandate given to the Liberation Committee in 1963 has been satisfactorily accomplished’ and therefore decided ‘to formally terminate that mandate’. The ‘mandate’ did not preclude the islands of Cape Verde, Comoros, Madagascar, Mauritius, Sao Tome and Principe and Seychelles from becoming independent nation states within the African Union.

The mandate in a nutshell was assisting and expediting the process of decolonization and the elimination of apartheid. This therefore means that in the euphoria of the defeat of the apartheid regime we let slip off our minds the remaining task of the decolonisation of all of Africa’s islands. Battle fatigue and the psychological trap of the feeling that South Africa was the last frontier overpowered our sense of responsibility to these islands and as such we recklessly abandoned these islands to the UK, France, Spain and Portugal.

(Africa's Islands also include the Caribbean territories under the colonial administration of the UK and France, in addition to the U.S. and the Netherlands. All of these maintain colonies in various forms of dependency status in the Caribbean and are populated mainly by peoples of African descent. In this context, the African diaspora should not be omitted from this dialogue. - OTR) 

The question may be asked of what use are these far-flung islands to Africa? The answer lies in why is it that the UK would go to war, far, far away into the deep south of the Atlantic Ocean in order to secure the Falklands Islands (Malvinas) and keep it in UK’s sphere of interest? The rationale here is made unambiguously clear by a White Paper on Overseas Territories issued by the British government on Thursday, June 28, 2012. The document on the Overseas Territories (OT) declared there would be ‘no weakening’ in Britain's resolve to defend the Falkland Islands and other Overseas Territories.

The paper – which sets out a vision for the future of the 14 British Overseas Territories – was signed by the United Kingdom’s Prime Minister David Cameron and Foreign Secretary William Hague, and pledges to continue to ensure the ‘sovereignty over the Territories.’ In the text, the UK vows to guarantee the Overseas Territories citizens’ ‘right of self-determination’ and states the commitment to maintain military presence in order to assure UK’s sovereignty over the South Atlantic territories. Foreign Secretary Hague said: ‘We want OT to be vibrant, flourishing communities that proudly retain British identity’. Here the OT includes St Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha, all part of Nkrumah’s list of islands of Africa that has yet to be de-colonised. (en.mercopress.com/2012/06/28/) 

The British ‘proudly’ seek to stamp and proudly retain their identity wherever they may be in the world in furtherance of their own self-interest. Nkrumah propagated the concept of the African Personality in order for Africans to proudly retain their identity. In May 1963, the founding fathers of the OAU set up the Liberation Committee to proudly stamp and retain our African identity by freeing the remaining parts of Africa, which were still under colonial and racist domination. Through the sterling work of the Committee the British, French, Portuguese, Spanish and Afrikaans could not retain their respective identities in continental Africa. The British White Paper – which sets out a vision for the future of the 14 British Overseas Territories - must be a wakeup call for the African Union Commission. It must as a matter of urgency seek a fresh mandate to apply themselves to the business of total decolonisation of all of Africa’s islands. In other words, the African Union commission must set out a vision for the immediate decolonisation, defence and development of our islands and affirm Africa’s sovereignty over these islands. It is our glorious ancestors who left us with the metaphor that: ‘You have something of value if you have land. You have something of value if you have water. Water is life and land is your essence. When you alienate land a bit of you dies.’ 

The African Union commission must act with a sense of urgency. Here it has the benefit of hindsight and South Africa, Namibia and Mozambique should offer themselves as the ‘frontline states’ as Tanzania and Zambia did. The task of decolonisation of these islands must not be left alone to our island nations of Madagascar, Mauritius, Comoros, Seychelles and also Morocco. Morocco remains part of Africa despite pulling out of the African Union over the refusal of the member states to recognise Morocco’s surrogate colonisation of Western Sahara for its phosphate and other rich minerals resources to serve the interest of the United States. 

The total decolonisation of Africa’s islands is a task that has to be undertaken and executed and I am personally calling on the African Union Commission to seek the wise counsel of Presidents Kaunda, Nujoma, Chissano and Mbeki and Ambassador Mohamed Sahnoun of Algeria and Speaker Theo-Ben Gurirab of Namibia. I strongly believe they will recommend the urgency of a fresh mandate to decolonise Africa’s Islands. Ambassador Sahnoun was the first Assistant Secretary-General of the OAU with special responsibility for the Liberation Committee. Dr. Theo-Ben Gurirab, outstanding freedom fighter and diplomat, was a former foreign minister and prime minister. The new mandate and vision to finish the business of decolonisation and total liberation must be anchored on the maxim: ‘African lands in African hands’.

Finally, in the words of Nkrumah: ‘...To us, Africa with its islands is just one Africa. We reject the idea of any kind of partition. From Tangiers or Cairo in the North to Cape Town in the South, from Cape Guardafui in the East to Cape Verde Islands in the West, Africa is one and indivisible.’ (AFRICA MUST UNITE; p. 217).




15 December 2015

U.N. General Assembly adopts 2015 resolutions on decolonisation


"The nations of the world have once again approved global policies intended to to bring about full self-government for the remaining small island Caribbean and Pacific dependencies administered by European and North American countries. These agreed strategies  for a genuine process of self-determination provide an essential roadmap for decolonisation, but can only be realised if the political will exists among the member States and U.N. system alike to carry out the implementation of these guidelines." - a Caribbean decolonisation expert.

___________________________________________________________________

United Nations Press Release

excerpts

General Assembly Adopts 28 Fourth Committee Texts Covering Issues Including Decolonization, Outer Space, Israeli-Palestinian Conflict


Two Actions Postponed until Later Date, 
as Plenary Acts Directly on Three Drafts
Upon the recommendation of its Fourth Committee (Special Political and Decolonization), the General Assembly adopted 25 draft resolutions and three draft decisions tackling issues ranging from decolonization issues to outer space activities, to the long-standing Israeli-Palestinian conflict and beyond.

The Assembly also took direct plenary action, adopting three outstanding texts on the return or restitution of cultural property to the countries of origin, the situation in Afghanistan, and the report of the Economic and Social Council.

Closely following the Fourth Committee’s recommendations, it adopted, without a vote, a series of annual texts relating to the decolonization of specific Non-Self-Governing Territories. They included draft resolutions affirming the right to self-determination for the peoples of Western Sahara, New Caledonia, French Polynesia and Tokelau.

Also without a vote, the Assembly adopted the Fourth Committee’s annual “omnibus” draft on the questions of American Samoa, Anguilla, Bermuda, British Virgin Islands, Cayman Islands, Guam, Montserrat, Pitcairn, Saint Helena, Turks and Caicos Islands and the United States Virgin Islands.

It adopted a related draft resolution, “Information from Non-Self-Governing Territories transmitted under Article 73 e of the Charter of the United Nations”, by a recorded vote of 175 in favour to none against, with 4 abstentions (France, Israel, United Kingdom, United States). By that text, the Assembly requested that the administering Powers concerned transmit regularly to the Secretary-General statistical and other information of a technical nature relating to economic, social and educational conditions in the Territories for which they were respectively responsible.

Meanwhile, it adopted a draft resolution on “Economic and other activities which affect the interests of the peoples of the Non-Self-Governing Territories” by a recorded vote of 176 in favour to 2 against (Israel, United States), with 2 abstentions (France, United Kingdom). By its terms, the Assembly affirmed the value of foreign economic investment undertaken in collaboration with the peoples of those Territories and in accordance with their wishes, in order to make a valid contribution to the socioeconomic development of the Territories, especially during times of economic and financial crisis.

By a recorded vote of 175 in favour to 3 against (Israel, United Kingdom, United States), with 1 abstention (France), the Assembly also adopted a draft on “Dissemination of information on decolonization”, by which it requested that the United Nations undertake efforts to give publicity to its work in the field of decolonization.

The Assembly adopted another draft resolution — “Implementation of the Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples by the specialized agencies and the international institutions associated with the United Nations” — by a recorded vote of 126 in favour to none against, with 53 abstentions. By that text, the Assembly urged those and other organizations of the United Nations system that had not yet provided assistance to the Non-Self-Governing Territories to do so as soon as possible.




A draft resolution titled “Offers by Member States of study and training facilities for inhabitants of Non-Self-Governing Territories” was adopted without a vote. In addition, the Assembly postponed until a later date its consideration of a draft resolution, “Implementation of the Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples”, pending a review by the Fifth Committee (Administrative and Budgetary) of the programme budget implications of adopting that text.

Taking up two draft resolutions on questions relating to information, the Assembly adopted both without a vote, the first being a text titled “Information in the service of humanity” and the second, “United Nations public information policies and activities”.

I

08 December 2015

Contemporary independence is an exercise in inter-dependence

Palau cited as example of "a different way to develop oneself, one which is focused on long terms gains and goals and not short terms ones."


NO REST FOR THE AWAKE - MINAGAHET CHAMORRO





For those thinking about the future of Guam, especially in the context of decolonization, we should stop looking to the United States, but instead look to Palau/Belau. Many of our ideas about decolonization or independence and therefore political possibility are tied to the way we perceive the United States. We see it as being the model for the way a country should live and exist today. 

We are conditioned in an endless number of ways each day and over the course of our lives here to see the United States as the pinnacle of possibility. That if we are to live anyway, it should be the images we have of it. We look to other large and powerful countries as distant alternatives, but always we see America as being where its at. The way we see America however is far from objective. Our gaze drips with colonial nonsense. 

When the first discussions on political status change and decolonization started to emerge in Guam, one constant refrain of resistance was the notion that Guam could never be self-sustaining and self-sufficient and therefore independent the way the United States is. As a result independence is impossible and we shouldn't try. But as the late Guam Senator Frank Lujan reminded people in his article "Sleeping Beauty: Time Passes By,"

"Those who defend Guam's colonial status argue that economic independence for Guam is impractical. We happen to agree. Guam by herself can never be economically independent. But nor can our great mother country the United States. There no longer is any such animal as an independent nation in the world today...All nations in the latter part of the 20th century are economically interdependent."

This is such an important reminder, on so many levels. It is a reminder that many things which we assume to be true and bedrock facts, may simply be fear and ignorance. To imagine that Guam has to take care of everything on its own and can't get any help from others is ridiculous. 

Every independent nation works with others. The difference between a colony and an independent country is that a country gets to choose who it wishes to associate with. As a colony, you are stuck with your colonizer's list of friends and enemies. But this is also a reminder that we should look at places closer to home when trying to imagine independence for Guam. Places who were once colonized who are using their autonomy and their resources and potential advantages to the best of their abilities. Places, such as Palau/Belau. 

It is making headlines around the world lately, for pioneering a number of environmental programs. Whereas most countries give some lip service to the environment, but are actually ravaging their natural resources with chaotic and frantic speed and efficiency, Palau is hitting the breaks. They are showing us a different way to develop oneself, one which is focused on long terms gains and goals and not short terms ones. They are not seeking to sell off their fish, their lakes, their waters, their lands as quickly as possible in order to get as much money as possible as quickly as possible. They are instead seeking a way to protect what is precious and irreplaceable and should be beyond value in terms of money.