07 September 2014

Colonial Privileges or Why Chinese People Don't Visit Guam


"Guam, Where America’s Day Begins” has always been a slogan that doesn’t sit right with me. When I was in school and learned the slogans or nicknames or different states, I was always struck at how different the others were from the one I would hear on Guam. New Mexico is the Land of Enchantment. New York is the Empire State. Then there’s the Volunteer State, the Granite State, the Show-Me State, etc.



For those communities that are full and real parts of the United States, their mottos are a commentary on how they entered the union or what they bring into the American family. With the exception of Maryland, which sometimes is referred to as “America in Miniature” none of them use the word “America” in their nickname. In an interesting way, the 50 states are the real pieces that make up the American whole, they don’t have to say they are America’s this or America’s that. They are included. 

Guam on the other hand, which is “foreign in a domestic sense” isn’t really a part of the United States, but something that belongs to it. The inclusion of the 50 states is an assumed fact, no one needs to be reminded about it (except sometimes in the case of Hawai’i). But for the colonies, you always have to find some way of asserting that you belong, or reminding your colonizer that you are a distant and regularly forgotten part of them.

I always found it intriguing that this slogan “Where America’s Day Begins” is used as a selling point for Guam, a marketing mantra to bring others, such as tourists here. But the truth of it is, that this mantra exists just as much for ourselves, in order to help convince ourselves that we exist as more in relation to the United States than we really do.

Guam is a colony. Calling it where America’s Day Begins doesn’t change that fact, but it does provide a means of helping people forget the colonial truth. Perhaps if we say we are “Where America’s Day Begins” enough times, and put it on enough t-shirts, throw it into enough videos or speeches, we might actually become a part of America! This is not how the world works, but rather a convenient means of allowing one to obscure the truth and accept a wishful patriotic fantasy instead.

I am currently working on an academic article about the relationship between Guam’s colonial status and the development of its tourism industry. The “Where America’s Day Begins” slogan plays a big role in providing the theoretical framework for understanding how Guam’s relationship to the United States has both stimulated the growth of tourism, but also inhibited it at times.

As a colony of the United States, Guam has gotten to market itself as “America in Asia” so travellers from Asia can travel just a few hours, for just a few hundred dollars and experience this lovely 212 sq. mile sliver of America. Guam is able to promote itself as an exotic location that can provide an American sense of stability, which other “exotic” and faraway locations may not be able to pull off. Traveling to some paradisical third world country might get you stuck in the middle of a coup, but not if you come to Guam, where you can rely on good old American consistency!

The downside to this however is that, the relationship to the United States comes with military bases and is based heavily on strategic importance. The United States has been involved in more wars and more conflicts than any other country since World War II, and this does have an affect on our tourism industry. US involvement in conflicts in Vietnam, the Middle East and even 9/11 all affected visitor arrivals. Increased visibility as a military bastion can inevitably lead to decreased viability as a tourist destination. 

We have been fortunate thus far in this regard, but even the Guam Visitor’s Bureau in 2010 admitted to the possibility that a significant increase in the size of US military bases on Guam and the number of military personnel could have severe effects on Guam’s desirability as a tourist destination. Jet skiing next to amphibious assault training tends not to make treasured memories. 

While people are always quick to point to how the relationship to the United States supports and sustains and stimulates, we should never forget the ways it also constricts and inhibits. Being a colony means that basic elements of self-governance are absent here, or as we were reminded recently by the Obama Administration, things such as having a local government or citizenship or being able to benefit from US Federal programs are privileges, not rights. We find examples of this in the realm of tourism both in the past as well as today.

Most people today don’t remember that after World War II, everyone coming in and out of Guam required clearance by the US Navy. Even Chamorros returning to their homeland required the permission of the US Navy for entry. This restriction, which fell into the hands of the US Navy and was not under local control, limited economic development on the island, included any tourism. It was eventually rescinded in 1962 after the recently appointed governor of Guam, Bill Daniels complained.

What we find today is that Guam’s ability to grow certain new tourist markets is severely hampered by the lack of local control over immigration. Local leaders have been seeking a Guam only visa waiver for mainland Chinese for decades, but have been unable to get anywhere because of the conflict with national and diplomatic interests. Some may point to the fact that in 2012 Homeland Security exercised its parole authority to allow Russian citizens to visit Guam without a visa, as an example to how things are not that bad. But this only ignores the fundamental issue, namely that it was not our decision and it is a privilege that can be taken away. The basic rights and abilities that a community needs to develop itself are not in our control.

06 September 2014

The Sad, Dark End of the British Empire

POLITICO Magazine


During the 19th and early 20th centuries, Britain had dominion over so many portions of the Earth it was said, famously, that “the sun never set on the British Empire.” 

Since the end of World War II, however, that sun has been steadily dipping toward the horizon. Today, sundown is truly at hand.

On Sept. 18, the voters of Scotland will go to the polls to determine whether their nation will declare independence from the United Kingdom after 307 years of union with England. Polls over the last 18 months reported by the website What Scotland Thinks show a gradually rising tide for independence even though advocates of remaining in the U.K. still lead in the surveys. But many Scots have said they are undecided—and thus they hold a key to the decision.

The Economist magazine has suggested that Scots voting with their heads will choose to stay with England, while those voting with their hearts will opt for independence, but “it is the nationalists who have fire in their bellies.”

Read more: http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2014/08/the-sad-end-of-the-british-empire-110362.html#ixzz3BhDPWsKH

FT.COM




05 September 2014

Sint Maarten/St. Martin to collaborate on major health study

Dutch, French to do joint health study, launch health observatory



page3b082
~ 'Diseases don't stop at the border' ~


CONCORDIA--Dutch St. Maarten and French St. Martin health officials launched a regional Health Observatory on Friday and announced plans to embark on a joint public health study to assess the health situation amongst the population on both sides of the island.
Some work has already begun under the Health Observatory, which is based initially at the Louis Constant Fleming Hospital in French St. Martin. The entire project will cost 1,184,095 million euros. The St. Maarten government will cover 25 per cent of the cost and French St. Martin 75 per cent via Interreg Caraibes.
Health Minister Cornelius de Weever (St. Maarten) and Second Vice President of the Collectivité of St. Martin in charge of Social Affairs Ramona Thomas signed an agreement for the health initiatives at the end of the launch ceremony at the Chamber of Commerce of St. Martin in Concordia.

READ THE FULL ARTICLE IN THE DAILY HERALD.


04 September 2014

Island leaders oppose Pacific marine monument expansion

Unilateral power to make such designations against the will of the elected governments of the U.S. territories is a hallmark of the U.S. - territorial relationship.

Inos asks Obama to reconsider ocean reserve expansion plan

MARIANAS VARIETY

CNMI Governor Eloy S. Inos is asking President Obama to reconsider the proposal to expand the Pacific Remote Island Marine Monument and other similar ocean reserves in the Pacific.

Department of Lands and Natural Resources Secretary Arnold I. Palacios, who is also the chairman of the Western Pacific Regional Fishery Management Council, earlier echoed the concerns of the U.S. fishery community on the marine monument expansion, saying it will impact U.S. tuna fisheries.

Although Obama does not want to include the Marianas Trench Marine Monument in the ocean reserve expansion plan, Inos believes that the Pacific Remote Islands Marine Monument expansion “is a first step in expanding other marine national monuments located in the western Pacific.”

The Pacific Remote Islands Marine National Monument encompasses Wake, Baker, Howland, and Jarvis Islands, Johnston Atoll, Kingman Reef, and Palmyra Atoll which lie to the south and west of Hawaii.

Inos told Obama in his Aug. 15 letter that “the proposed expansion is of great concern to us in the NMI, as well as those I have talked to in Guam, Hawaii and American Samoa.”

The expansion, the governor said, will impact Hawaii’s longline fleet, as well as the tuna cannery in American Samoa.

“Less obvious will be the continued gradual deterioration of Pacific Island culture and tradition as more waters in the western Pacific are taken out of sustainable use in the name of conservation,” Inos said.

“As governor, I hope you will appreciate my perspective on how implementing an advocacy-based conservation agenda under the Antiquities Act can negatively affect island communities in the Western Pacific,” said Inos who described the Marianas Trench Marine Monument as a “paper park that has been mostly neglected since it was designated in 2009.”

Then-President George W. Bush signed a proclamation on Jan. 6, 2009 designating the three northernmost islands of Maug, Asuncion and Parallon de Pajaros as part of the marine monument.

Inos told Obama that only after making a series promises in Dec. 2008 was the Bush administration able to gain some local support for the Marianas Trench Marine Monument.

But to date, Inos said, “most of those promises remain unmet.”

He added, “The unilateral top-down approach in designating marine monuments via the Antiquities Act for conservation purposes is an affront to Pacific Island Communities.”

Inos said: “Although we represent different island cultures, the common thread that binds us together is our island heritage, our strong cultural association with the sea, respect for the environment, and a belief in the sustainable use of natural resources. I find it ironic that the primary purpose of Congress for passing the Antiquities Act was specifically to protect the culture and heritage of Native American Indians. Now one hundred and eight years later, this same law is being used to threaten the culture and heritage of native Pacific Islanders.”

According to the governor, “Fisheries are very important to the economy of the NMI, especially due to its geography which puts it between 3 to 4 hours flying time from every East and Southern Asian country. We have a history of supporting U.S. tuna fisheries, including pole-and-line fishing, purse seining and long-lining. The continued loss of U.S. waters reduces the attractiveness to the CNMI of supporting these fisheries and industries. While other Pacific islands are actively developing their tuna fisheries with strong support from their governments, the U.S. appears to be more intent on arbitrarily closing commercial fishing ventures based on an East Coast conservation paradigm.”

On behalf of the affected communities in the western Pacific who believe in the sustainable use of marine resources, Inos told the president, “I urge you to reconsider your proposal to expand the boundaries of the Pacific Remote Islands Marine National Monument or any other marine monument.”

Island leaders oppose Pacific monument expansion


By Richelle Agpoon-Cabang

Marianas Variety 




More Pacific island leaders and many marine conservationists are expressing their opposition to President Obama’s proposed expansion of the Pacific Remote Islands Marine National Monument.

These include Gov. Eloy Inos, the Western Pacific Regional Fisheries Management Council, the governments of Guam and American Samoa each of which sent a letter to the White House expressing their concerns and strong objection.

Pew Charitable Trusts, a non-government organization, supports the expansion and said it has gathered more than 100,000 signatures of other supporters from around the globe.
In an interview, Pew’s director of the Ocean Legacy Project, Matt Rand, said he is optimistic about the outcome of their campaign.

“It is time for people to be aware and act to protect our marine natural resources,” Rand said.

But John Gourley, a longtime CNMI resident and a Marine conservation advocate, said the Pew campaign is bogus and deceiving.

He said Pew is using scientific studies on overfishing that were disapproved by environmentalists years ago.

The most recent report from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration shows that the percentage of overfished stock went down from 10 percent to 9 percent last year.

Only two fish species within the Western Pacific ocean jurisdiction are under the overfishing list.

Gourley said Pew is “using general research to persuade the public to sign a petition which most signatories do not really understand.”

Pacific island leaders fear that their heritage and culture will be affected if the expansion proceeds.

A letter from the CNMI to Obama states: “What you may not know is that there is a growing resentment in island communities throughout the western pacific with the Antiquities Act and the unilateral approach used by a sitting president in designating [Marine National Monuments].”

The signatories include Gourley, former Sen. Herman R. Guerrero, president of the Northern Marianas Descent Corporation, Felix Sasamoto, president of Marianas Apnea Spearfishing Club, Ray Camacho of the Saipan and Northern Islands Municipal Council, Richard Seman of the NMI Fishermen Marketing Association, Benigno Sablan of Guihan Pasifiku, Tony Scragg of the Saipan Fishermen Association, Rosemond B. Santos of the KKMP Foundation, David Johanson of Marianas Sailing Club, Cecilia Selepeo of Guardians of Gani, Isidoro Cabrera of the Economic Research and Development Foundation, Kodep Ogumoro-Uludong of the Aghurubw Society, Juan Tenorio of the Tanapag Action Group and Cecilio Raiukiulipiy of the Marianas Water Operations Association.

For their part, the mayors of Saipan, the Northern Islands, Rota and Tinian told the president: “Slowly but surely the Atiquities Act is being used as the tool to close our marine waters to fishing and other extractive purposes for political reasons that have nothing to do with us…. We believe this monument expansion proposal is just the first step in expanding the Marianas Tench, Rose Atoll and Papahanaumokuakea MNMs.”

CNMI leaders also noted the unfulfilled promises that the federal government made to them when the commonwealth agreed to the creation of the Marianas Trench marine monument.

Among the promises were allowing the CNMI to co-manage the monument, the establishment of visitors park and a patrol vessel that was to be provided to the commonwealth.

In his letter, Governor Inos said the federal government failed to fulfill its promises.

Guam Gov. Eddie Baza Calvo said: “A complete ban on nearly all activities is disproportionate to current management concerns and is in contrast to the direction given to the Pacific Islands regional planning body for which Guam is an active member…. I humbly request that the expansion of the current monument boundaries be tabled and further discussed with the Western Pacific Regional Fishery Management Council and that it be allowed to exist in perpetuity.”

In his letter to the White House, American Samoa Gov. Lolo M. Moliga said the expansion is “demoralizing and it is quite disturbing that the proponents for the expansion are individuals who have no basic understanding of what the expansion will do to the lives of the affected people.”

He said by not consulting other island territories, the White House “epitomizes the typical federal attitude that island residents whose lives are directly affected are not entitled to participate in the process of consultation to ascertain how they feel about the proposed measure.”

He added, “As a territory of the U.S., we have no vote on the floor of Congress, but we hope that as a person who grew up in the U.S. Pacific Islands, you will recall the intrinsic importance of the sea to the Pacific islanders, not only for their subsistence living but also for the economic survival of our islands. I implore you to please not expand the existing monuments or create new marine national monuments in the U.S. Pacific Islands.”

03 September 2014

Thousands of incidents involving U.S. military cost Japan 380 million yen in compensation

By KOSHIN SHISUI
Staff Writer


U.S. military personnel and civilian employees were involved in nearly 10,000 incidents or accidents in Japan over a 10-year period through fiscal 2013, according to statistics compiled by the Defense Ministry and the Okinawa prefectural government.

The cases cost Japanese taxpayers at least 380 million yen ($3.7 million) in compensation and damage payments, according to the figures analyzed by The Asahi Shimbun on Aug. 12.

There were 9,962 cases involving U.S. personnel during the time frame, 2,138 of which were subject to compensation claims against the Japanese government, even if the sole responsibility lay with U.S. personnel, officials said. The remaining 7,824 cases occurred during off-duty hours.

The reason for the payments is that the Japan-U.S. Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA) stipulates that the Japanese government has to shoulder 25 percent of the compensation costs for incidents or accidents that occur during on-duty hours, such as those involving military aircraft involved in a crash, traffic accidents, thefts and sex crimes, even if Japan is not responsible.

Also, the SOFA stipulates that if both the United States and Japan are responsible, the Japanese government has to pay 50 percent of the cost.

One lawyer involved in lawsuits involving the U.S. military in Okinawa questioned the fairness of the payments.

“It is not reasonable that taxes paid by the Japanese people are used (as part of the compensation) for illegal acts committed during on-duty hours, for which the United States is totally responsible,” said the lawyer, Tsutomu Arakaki. “The United States should shoulder all the compensation.”

According to the statistics, about 48 percent of the nearly 10,000 cases took place in Okinawa Prefecture, which hosts more than 70 percent of the U.S. military facilities in Japan. Many people in the island prefecture are asking for a revision to the SOFA.

In total, about 2.03 billion yen was paid in compensation to claimants who suffered damages during the 10-year period. Of that amount, 1.5 billion yen was for the 2,138 incidents or accidents that occurred during on-duty hours, including the 380 million yen paid by the Japanese government.

In the crash of a U.S. military helicopter that occurred on the campus of Okinawa International University in Ginowan on Aug. 13, 2004, it was determined the accident was the sole responsibility of the United States. However, the Japanese government shouldered 25 percent of about 270 million yen in compensation paid out over the crash.

As for incidents or accidents involving U.S. military personnel that occur during off-duty hours, the SOFA has no stipulations on the percentage of compensation that Japan is responsible for.

02 September 2014

UN Anti Racial Discrimination Committee addresses Okinawa militarisation

The United Nations asks the Japanese government to respect Okinawan people’s opposition against the Henoko relocation plan


Ryukyu Shimpo
The United Nations asks the Japanese government to respect Okinawan people's opposition against the Henoko relocation plan
August 21, at the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights in Geneva, Switzerland, the United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (CERD) commented that Okinawan people's will should be respected regarding U.S. military policies.



August 22, 2014 Tsuyoshi Arakaki of Ryukyu Shimpo
On August 20 and 21, the United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (CERD) investigated on racial discrimination in Japan. They also discussed policies on the U.S. military bases in Okinawa. One of the committee members pointed out that it is important to discuss with the local people and get their agreement on the planned construction of a new base in the Henoko district of Nago City for replacement of U.S. Marine Corps Futenma Air Station. Another said that local residents should be involved in the decision making. The committee will announce its final remarks and release an advisory report by the end of the month. One of the committee members stressed that the rights of Okinawan people to access traditional land and resources should be recognized and guaranteed. Another claimed that residents should be included in the decision-making process for policies that might affect their rights. They agreed that there should be local participation at the early stages of decision-making, especially regarding the U.S. military base issues.
Meanwhile at the opening of the meeting, a representative of the Japanese government said, “The residents of Okinawa and natives of Okinawa Prefecture are given and protected by legal equality with Japanese nationals under the Japanese Constitution.” The Japanese government presented their view that the economic gap between the mainland Japan and Okinawa has reduced, and that Okinawa has steadily developed in industry. They expressed respect for the prefecture’s initiative in implementing measures and policies since the Okinawan Promotion Planning policy, previously led by the state, was handed over to the prefecture.
To the Japanese government which does not recognize Okinawan people as “Indigenous People,” one of the committee members pointed out that it is important to consider how people in the Ryukyus identify and define themselves. Another pointed out UNESCO recognizes that Ryukyu/Okinawa has unique language, culture, and tradition and urges the Japanese government to recognize and protect such uniqueness. There have also been many inquiries about policies to protect Ryukyuan languages (Shimakutuba). A representative of the Japanese government asserted, “Those who live in Okinawa Prefecture or natives of Okinawa are not generally considered to be a group of people who share distinct biological or cultural characteristics. Therefore, they are not considered to be the subject of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination.”
One of the committee members claimed the Ryukyu Kingdom’s long relationship with Ming and Qing Chinese dynasties, the history of annexation of the Ryukyu Kingdom in 1879 and assimilation policies promoted by the Japanese government all verify the indigeneity of Okinawans. He said it was wrong that Japan does not recognize this. Another said the Japanese government should respect Okinawan people’s will and guarantee their rights in light of this history.
(English translation by T&CT and Megumi Chibana)

See also:


U.S. military takes 1st step in Okinawa relocation

Marine Corps Times

Anti-U.S. base protesters in canoe are blocked Thursday by a Japan Coast Guard speed boat in Nago, Okinawa. Japanese officials said buoys are being floated off the southernmost island of Okinawa in one of the first steps in the relocation of an American military base. The buoys define the area where the construction will begin on a facility in coastal Henoko that will house the Marine Corps Air Station Futenma, which will be relocated from a crowded residential area of Okinawa.
Anti-U.S. base protesters in canoe are blocked Thursday by a Japan Coast Guard speed boat in Nago, Okinawa. Japanese officials said buoys are being floated off the southernmost island of Okinawa in one of the first steps in the relocation of an American military base. The buoys define the area where the construction will begin on a facility in coastal Henoko that will house the Marine Corps Air Station Futenma, which will be relocated from a crowded residential area of Okinawa. (AP)
  • FILED UNDER
In this aerial photo, workers in boats set up no-go zone Thursday in the sea off Nago, Okinawa. The buoys define the area where the construction will begin on a facility in coastal Henoko that will house the Marine Corps Air Station Futenma, which will be relocated from a crowded residential area of Okinawa. (AP)
TOKYO — Buoys were being floated off the southernmost island of Okinawa Thursday in one of the first steps in the long-planned but highly contentious relocation of an American military base.
The buoys define the area where preparations for construction will begin on a facility in coastal Henoko that will house the Marine Corps Air Station Futenma, which will be relocated from a crowded residential area of Okinawa.
Okinawa houses the majority of U.S. troops in Japan. Protests against the bases have been going on for decades. Aircraft noise, crashes and crime are among the frequent complaints.
The Japanese Defense Ministry confirmed the placing of buoys began Thursday but declined to give details, citing security concerns. Public broadcaster NHK showed protesters on boats being blocked by patrol boats, and others holding up signs outside the U.S. base saying “No new base.”
Opponents say majority of people are opposed to the construction, which some say would endanger the coral reef, tropical fish and other ocean life.
Land reclamation is needed for an airstrip to be built over the water from Camp Schwab, a U.S. military base. The buoys mark the location where boring of the seabed will take place for a government study to prepare for construction.
Japanese media reports said the drilling could start as early as this weekend. The Defense Ministry declined comment. The U.S. military also had no immediate comment on the activities Thursday.
Many Okinawans want the U.S. off the island entirely, but public opinion is divided with Gov. Hirokazu Nakaima backing the plan.
The Marines’ relocation to Henoko is part of a broader plan to consolidate and reduce the U.S. military presence in Okinawa. Previous efforts to implement the move have stalled. The U.S. and Japan agreed on the plan in 1996.
The administration of Prime Minister Shinzo Abe has repeatedly said the plan is important for the crucial alliance with the U.S. amid territorial disputes with China and the nuclear threat from North Korea.
But Susumu Inamine, the mayor of Nago, where Henoko is located, noted his reelection earlier this year underlines the people’s opposition to the plan.
He said assessments on environmental damage were not thorough enough, and accused the government of forcing the issue.
“Pushing forward with this tramples on the human rights of the people, and the rich diverse natural life of this region. This is no longer about democracy,” Inamine said in a statement.

74 percent of Okinawan people oppose the Henoko relocation




[Editorial] Abe administration signals future reign of terror in Henoko



The government is controlling the residents by force in Henoko, Nago. As far as we know, the government has never unleashed such reckless disregard of the will of the people, as we have seen at Henoko. The Ministry of Defense installed salvage barges in the sea of Henoko for undersea drilling for building an air base to replace Marine Corps Air Station Futenma.

The government has clamped down on the resistance in the past. However, 74 percent of Okinawan people oppose the Henoko relocation. We wonder if there has ever been a case like this, where the government has trampled on the will of the overwhelming majority of people in the prefecture elsewhere in Japan. This action by the government evokes memories of the crackdown against peasants during the Edo period.

The same repression also took place in Japan’s annexation of the Ryukyu Kingdom and the Battle of Okinawa. Japan’s annexation of the Ryukyu Kingdom is called “Ryukyu Shobun” or disposal of the Ryukyu Kingdom, in 1879. In 1944 during the Battle of Okinawa, the Japanese military in Okinawa issued a decree that “the military, the bureaucracy and the people will all live as one, and die as one.” Okinawan people were forced to commit mass suicide. This history is a form of structural discrimination against Okinawan people, if such incidents have never taken place elsewhere in Japan. This is a barbaric action by the government, and so shameful if the international community just stands by.

Government ignores provisions of the Constitution

In Henoko, the government has responded with an attitude that they will allow physical force, even injury on residents who are against the government. They have shown their hostility and malice towards the residents. We have felt empty and completely discouraged. Particularly, the Japan Coast Guard showed its hard-line stance,. They asserted, “to ensure safety.” It is a quite ridiculous pretence. On August 15, crew-members of the coast guard removed a protester forcibly. At that time, his broken glasses cut his face. This is ironic because they caused injury to a resident despite saying they were removing him for his safety.

For the first time in the 18-year saga of the Henoko relocation plan, the government has unilaterally set up an always-off-limits water area in Oura Bay without any legal basis. This is a method employed by the government to deprive the residents of the right to access the sea. It is the same as that used by rulers during the Edo period. The coast guard has detained citizens outside of the off-limits area without showing legal basis. They gave a warning to residents who were sailing from a fishing port to protest against the work. They threatened, speaking in loud voices, the residents who were approaching the off-limits area. The Constitution provides that “no person shall be deprived of liberty without due process of law.” The coast guard has also violated Article 35 of the Constitution that provides for the principle of warrant. Thus, Japan is not a law-abiding country.

These acts are questionable on a legal basis. Who are outlaws of the sea, the residents or the coast guard? We suppose the Japan Coast Guard had better change its name to the “Security Service for construction of US military base” in the future. We know the efforts made by the 11th Regional Coast Guard Headquarters to win credibility from the residents after Okinawa’s reversion to Japan in 1972. They are now appear to be trashing the credibility of the organization in Henoko, in just a few days. We would like the coast guard to know the reality of Okinawa. Even so, there is an irony about the saga on the sea of Henoko.

The Ministry of Defense, Japan, safeguards the U.S. forces, which is the strongest military power in the world. The Japan Coast Guard and the police protect the Ministry of Defense. Security of a private company are placed on the front line. People who are supposed to hold the power and interests involving national defense, including diplomatic and defense officials, are observing the conflict between the residents and the security guards from a safe heigh.

A sacrifice stone to protect mainland Japan again

Prime Minister Shinzo Abe reportedly cross-examined defense officials about why the construction work was delayed and strongly urged them to accelerate the work. This is revealed in a new report by a lawmaker close to the prime minister. According to the report, the Falklands war waged by the U.K. in South America, boosted the flagging support rate for the Thatcher cabinet. The Abe administration appears to have learned from historical precedents in which state leaders acquired their centripetal forces by fuelling nationalism. Prime Minister Abe has taken a tough stance against China over the disputed Senkaku Islands. The Abe administration is determined to build a new air base in Henoko to get the U.S. forces involved in the Senkaku Islands dispute. They are sacrificing beautiful nature, land, and the safety of Okinawa as a tribute to the United States to gain its favour.

A perspective of Henoko reminds us of a strategy employed by the Japanese Imperial Army during the Battle of Okinawa. They made use of Okinawa, a “sacrifice stone” in order to postpone the decisive battle in mainland Japan. This strategy destroyed Okinawa. The coast guard has prevented the boats hired by news media from approaching the waters. The government is trying to punish the people who access information that it does not want to let them knowThis is a step forward to the reign of terror. The landfill approval by Okinawa Governor Hirokazu Nakaima has led to this confusion. His approval of the landfill permit has no legitimacy because he acted contrary to his pledge for the election. The government should stop the work in Henoko immediately if Japan is a democratic country. In the gubernatorial election in November, candidates should ask voters whether they approve or disapprove construction of the air base in Henoko.


*****



By KAZUO YAMAGISHI/ Staff Writer


NAGO, Okinawa Prefecture--With the government moving quickly on the planned relocation of Air Station Futenma to the Henoko district, about 3,600 demonstrators occupied the street in front of U.S. Marine Corps Camp Schwab here in a massive protest on Aug. 23.

To oppose the start of exploration drilling in the waters off Camp Schwab for land reclamation for a new runway, protesters lined the road for hundreds of meters. They chanted in unison, “Stop the construction of the new base” and “Stop the exploration drilling.”

The event was organized by local peace groups and opposition groups in the prefectural assembly, which brought participants to Nago in more than 30 chartered buses.

Okinawan legislators and peace campaign leaders gave impassioned speeches against the base relocation.

“We must open a new chapter of history by refusing the creation of a base that we Okinawans oppose,” one of the speakers said.

The speakers also repeatedly criticized Okinawa Governor Hirokazu Nakaima for giving the green light to the relocation of Futenma to Henoko, backing off his earlier pledge to demand the Futenma base be relocated outside the prefecture.

Nago Mayor Susumu Inamine, a staunch opponent of the Futenma relocation within Okinawa, said Okinawans must never give up the fight, because it is high time for them to demonstrate their spirit to the rest of the Japanese.

01 September 2014

U.S. Virgin Islands’ Economy Shrinks for Third Consecutive Year



The estimates of Gross Domestic Product for the U.S. Virgin Islands show that real GDP, adjusted to remove price changes, decreased 5.4 percent in 2013. This was the third consecutive decline following decreases of 13.8 percent in 2012 and 7.5 percent in 2011.

worldatlas.com
The 2013 decline in the Virgin Islands economy reflected decreases in exports of goods and in consumer spending. The decrease in exports of goods reflected the decline of the petroleum refining industry that for many years had played a dominant role in the economy. The Hovensa oil refinery, one of the world’s largest oil refineries, shut down operations on St. Croix in early 2012.


READ THE FULL REPORT HERE