13 January 2011

Anguilla Eyes Complete Internal Self-Government in Wake of British Colonial Pressures

"Anguilla is in a serious battle," says Chief Minister Hubert Hughes, "and all Anguillians at home and abroad are being called on to protect the country...This economic crisis tells us that we cannot be afraid any longer to talk about independence."

Anguilla News


Speech by the Chief Minister of Anguilla, Hon. Hubert Hughes
Public Rally
Blowing Point, Anguilla
8th January 2011


(The Valley, Anguilla) - Included here is a speech by the Chief Minister of Anguilla, Hon. Hubert Hughes, at a January 8th rally. The rally followed the refusal by the British Governor to sign the Government's 2011 Budget, another of a continuous series of steps seemingly directly opposed to the will of the duly elected government.


FELLOW ANGUILLIANS

I thank you for your tremendous attendance this evening. It shows that you have listened to the call to join with me in this fight for our FREEDOM – ECONOMIC FREEDOM. This is the first in a series of Rallies that we will be holding because no one must say that they do not know what is currently facing Anguilla .

We want everyone to know that Anguilla is in a serious battle and while you have elected a Government to responsibly take on these battles on your behalf, we have done the best that we can on your behalf. WE NOW NEED YOUR ADDITIONAL VOICES TO LET BRITAIN KNOW THAT THE MESSAGE WE SPEAK COMES NOT JUST FROM YOUR LEADERS, BUT FROM YOU.

This Rally is not a Government Rally, it is not an AUM rally.

Tonight’s rally is a Rally for Anguilla, a Rally for a FREE Anguilla and we want to make sure that all Anguillians at home and abroad understand that Anguilla right now is on the sacrificial alter; We want every Anguillian to understand that now it is the duty of each and every Anguillian to protect this island; protect it not just for ourselves, but for our children.

The one advantage I have being a politician all my life and being first elected in 1976, is that at this point in my life no one can accuse me of self-interest.

I am almost at the end of my career, but UNTIL THE LAST DAY THAT I SERVE THE PEOPLE OF THIS COUNTRY, I have to LOOK OUT FOR, FIGHT FOR, AND PROTECT THIS ISLAND so that the next generation has an island for which they can feel proud to call home.

The slogan that we have adopted for this series of Rallies that we will be having is "WE FREED ANGUILLA IN ‘67, WE WILL DO IT AGAIN IN 2011."

There is a reason why I wanted the memory of 1967 to be focused in our minds. The reason is because we need to remember that the Revolution of 1967 was a fight for our economic freedom, it was a fight for fair treatment, it was a fight for self-determination, it was a fight for a better life for the People of Anguilla.

Mr Ronald Webster was like Moses taking his people out of Egyptian bondage.

Our People had been feeling the weight of that unfair treatment. Back in that time, we were completely bereft of general amenities like water, electricity, telephone, general communications, roads and like. We were deprived of an opportunity to work and earn our own living in our island. The infrastructure discouraged foreign investment. We as a People were not feeling encouraged by the administrative relationship with St Kitts. We wanted a break. A break for a better life; a break to have the freedom to develop our own destiny.

We were aiming for complete independence. That was Mr Webster’s dream, that we should be independent, we should have economic freedom and we should be able to shape our own destiny.
Everyone knows that Britain never supported the Revolution. Left to Britain, we would have all been shipped off to Guyana a long time ago. They invaded us in 1969 and they installed their Commissioner, but the Anguilla Government headed by Mr Ronald Webster ran the affairs of Anguilla independently of the British Government.

Let us not think for one moment that Britain has ever forgotten that humiliation.

Over the years, Britain has been allowed to eat away at the Constitution we first had; a Constitution which gave SUPREMACY TO THE HERITAGE OF A FREE ANGUILLA.

Today, the Constitution that we have has essentially reversed the power that Anguilla had to control its own affairs and has put the power back into the hands of the British. We should remember our heritage so that we can teach our children and so THEY will teach the generations that come after. If not we will be like a ship without a rudder.

We have to send the message that to be an Anguillian is to be PROUD, BLACK AND FREE. That is the heritage of the band of men and women that stood behind Mr Webster. The mere fact that Britain has never recognised or honoured Mr Webster should give you a clue.

They prefer to honour Sir Emile Gumbs for his contribution. Don’t think that for one moment that this Government will receive British favour for giving Mr Webster the highest honour that this island can give to be considered as Father of the Nation – an honour that other Governments refused to give. At times like these when Anguilla is faced with its most serious economic crisis since that 43 years ago,

We cannot afford to let the work of the Father of the Nation, Mr Ronald Webster go down the drain;
We cannot afford to let the work of Mrs Mildred Vanterpool to go down the drain;
We cannot afford to let the work of Mrs Daisy Wong go down the drain;
We cannot afford to let the work of Mrs Doreen Duncan go down the drain;
We cannot afford to let the work of Mr Collins Hodge and Wallace Rey and so many OTHERS to go down the drain.

That is why now in 2011 when AGAIN the chips are down; when the life as we know it is threatened to the core; when the plans of the British government clearly send us down a path of collapse we have to band together as we did back in ’67. We have to throw off the yoke of oppression and fix our eyes and energies on being able to control our own destiny.

So where are we today? What is this economic crisis that threatens our stability? I know that I am preaching to the converted when I say that everyone in Anguilla knows what was the state of Anguilla when this Gov’t got into office in Feb last year.

You all know that the Treasury was bone dry and that there was not even money to pay the salaries and general expenses for Government at the end of February. Everyone knows already that the former Gov’t had been borrowing over 10mil monthly since about Oct 2009. We were in dire state. But the Anguilla United Movement were prepared to take on the challenge of getting this island back on a track of prosperity. We asked for your TRUST in us and you gave it and we have earnestly, together with Mr Jerome Roberts who joined our Team, tried to get this country out of the dire economic slump that it is in.

Our plan focused on seeking to grow our economy, use capital investment initiatives such as the construction of the Sea Port at Blowing Point, attracting foreign investment so that money could be pumped money back into the island and so that it can circulate and stimulate economic activity.

Although the British Government had absolutely no difficulty in allowing the Front Government not to pass a Budget as they should have done in December, they refused our 1st Budget in March We worked again, implemented further initiatives and produced a 2nd Budget in June. And now in December, despite all the work and I can assure you the financial technocrats in the Ministry of Finance worked like beasts produced another Budget. 3 budgets in one year.

We know that we had a huge deficit. Over 86 million EC dollars when we came into the administration. We agreed with the British Government that we would seek to reduce that deficit and bring us to sustainability in three (3) years. That was the agreement. In our first year alone, our budget shows that we would be cutting that 80 million down to 50 million.

Now let’s be clear, we know that even to get to that point means that we were forced to implement some taxes which we are not exactly pleased about. But out of all the taxes that the British Government wanted us to implement we felt that the ones that we agreed to are reasonably manageable by our People and could still achieve the aim of reducing the deficit.

For several months our technocrats and the British finance technocrats have been having a back and forth over this Budget. There have been meetings sometimes several times per week and the one sticking point that continues to echo in those discussions is that the British Technocrats keep reminding our Finance Technocrats that the section dealing with Personal Emoluments or salaries of the Civil servants is too high.
Our Finance technocrats have showed the British technocrats over and over and under that the impact of cutting the civil servant salaries or cutting the service at this time is going to have such serious impact that the economic collapse of Anguilla is threatened.

You see it is important to understand the relationship between the civil service and the rest of the economy. Government is the biggest employer on the island. As such in an economy such as ours right now, where the private sector and the tourism sector are under-performing, if we are to cut civil servants in any significant numbers, with our knowledge of the state of the Banks, it would be an irresponsible act.

You have to remember the civil service is the portfolio of the Governor. It was HIS duty to ensure that the numbers of civil servants were grown to a manageable amount and that salaries were maintained at a sustainable level. None of that was done and both salaries and numbers of civil servants grew. Now is not the time to deal with either. Putting civil servants on the street without caring for how they will feed themselves or their families is morally reprehensible.

For us not to be concerned with how their loans will be paid, or how their ordinary bills would be paid or how they will be able to care for their household is not how this Government operates. Had our People had the safety nets like the People in England and collecting weekly amounts for them to survive, that would have been a consideration. But even after explaining ALL that to the British technocrats, that has become the sticking point. THEY JUST DON’T CARE.

Now that we have exposed them and have passed the Budget as is without sending people home the British Gov’t is playing their games. The Governor has just sent me a letter last night saying that the British government has not said that they want a particular level of reduction in expenditure or in the numbers of the public service. Again, A TWIST ON THE TRUTH because the Governor has been present in meetings, as indeed I have, in which the British technocrats were saying that we had to reduce the civil service. Our Finance technocrats like Dr Wycliffe Fahie, has come out publicly on radio and explained the situation that Anguilla faces to the people. He has shared with the People of the country the fact that the British technocrats have insisted that the salaries and numbers of civil service is the sticking point.

Dr Aidan Harrigan circulated an email to persons like Mr Bellingham right down to the Governor and others after one particular meeting (in expnanation).

So why try to make me out to be a liar? Why as I am hearing, the talk is that I am lying that the British want us to cut civil service salaries and numbers of the force? This is no time for games and I will not be in the business of playing games with the British when the life of Anguilla is at threat. This is why I am not going to put our People in further difficulty. I am not going to act in a manner that is going to put Anguilla in jeopardy. Even the technocrats are asking why Britain is seeking to implement policies that are going to cause Anguilla's economic collapse.

The Policies that they are seeking to implement will spiral Anguilla into an irrecoverable situation. The policies are the same type of policies that have caused other countries like Jamaica and Guyana to have to borrow from the IMF with disastrous consequences.

Close to 30 years later, the Jamaica dollar is 84 Jamaica dollars to 1 US . Flour and sugar cost $60/lb, Rice is $85/lb, condensed milk $140/can, sliced wheat bread $195 /lb, eggs $210/doz, detergent $310 /gal, Baby formula $1,400.00 /can. In Guyana the exchange rate is 200 Guyanese dollars to 1 US .

Every other country, the US , Japan , and others are bailing out their economy, by pumping billions of dollars into the economy. I said that in my speech a few days ago. England just gave Ireland billions of dollars to help rescue her. But she wants to do Anguilla is exact opposite – in this little island. She wants to be PLACING TAXES on us, SENDING WORKERS HOME and CUTTING SALARIES which will have the effect of crippling Anguilla .

And if for one moment you doubt the reason why the British would seek to do this to us look at Turks and Caicos islands. A group of islands that had a booming tourism economy, controlled their own destiny, now they are under the yoke of oppression; their constitution suspended; crime out of control, people out of work and they are completely dominated by the British who have filled so many positions held by local Turks and Caicos Islanders with British expats. Is that what we want for Anguilla ?

That is why I say that we are looking at another revolution – an economic revolution. We have to determine whether we are going to start seriously to move towards independence or allow the British to continually increase their powers.

So many of you wonder why I have difficulties with the Governor? The answer is truly simple. Our Philosophies are diametrically opposed to each other.

The British Government was on a path to allow the former administration to assist in creating Anguilla’s financial collapse and then the British could ride in on its white horse supposedly to rescue us like how they ‘rescued’ Turks & Caicos islands.

I have given you all examples time and time again about the lack of cooperation that I get from the Governor.

During the run-up to elections the Governor knew that both the AUM party and APP party were both saying that the Memorandums of Agreement that were signed with the big developers would have to be re-negotiated if we were successful. So what does the Governor do? He signs the Lease granting to Cap Juluca the right to hold our Land for 125 years with the automatic option for renewal for another 125 years on Election Day. You know what was his excuse to Mr Bellingham in England ? That at Executive Council it was decided that he would sign on Election day, so he was just complying with Exco. But everyone knows that he is the Chairman of EXCO. Shouldn’t he have been directing Exco like he likes to do now that we are in EXCO, and indicated that to sign such a Lease on election day was improper?

Look at how the Governor has been allowed to disregard our Constitution to the knowledge of his bosses in England by not appointing my Ministers in my absence. Every Lawyer can tell you that he does not have discretion under the Constitution when I advise him who is to be Chief Minister in my absence. Yet he does what he want.

He disrespects the highest law of the land, and by extension disrespects us as a People, because that could situation could not happen in England .

I have told you how the Governor wants me to dismiss my Ministers Walcott and Evan. He is trying to claim that Walcott turned down work permits without bringing them to EXCO. Such is the disrespect that even though I have asked him to put whatever are the allegations he has against Minister Walcott in writing – he has refused.

Minister Walcott wrote him a letter of his own last year asking him to put his allegations in writing. He has refused to even discuss it with Walcott and sent him back a response telling him he doesn’t need to discuss it with him, he will discuss it with me. And what is he asking when he meets with me? That I suspend Walcott and then AFTER that they will investigate.

With respect to Evan the Governor is trying to set up a story that Evan did not have permission to vote Anglec shares, when he knows that the Government of Anguilla won the case that was brought against us and that it was raised at Exco that I gave Evans permission. His latest position on Evan is that that issue is no longer serious.

There is no respect that is shown to us as Ministers of Government. I had to hear about a new Public Integrity Board on the radio just like you.

While we have to be cutting back on our Budget, the Governor is inflating his. I understand that Mr Fritz Smith Chairman or a high-ranking member of the AUF has been hired as the Estate Manager to take care of Government House. The Governor has not volunteered to share with me the details of that transaction, but I have seen Mr Smith on the premises. I wonder why Public Works could not have been asked to do the maintenance of Government’s property? Wouldn’t that have been a good cost-cutting exercise?

You see we have to realise that the Governor has to follow the plans of the British. His plans and our plans are very different because the agendas of the British and our agendas are different. We are now considered assets and the British Government will do what it wants to keep us under its thumb.

This economic crisis tells us that we cannot be afraid any longer to talk about independence. I pledge to you that we will not let this matter rest anymore.

But the immediate issue is that you have to raise your voices with your Government and make sure that Anguilla is the winner in this crisis. We are going to do so peacefully.

I ask for your Support. I ask you to ensure that the heritage of ’67 is not allowed to fail. We have to make sure that the message that Britain gets is clear and unmistakeable.

WE HAVE BEEN PATIENT, BUT WHEN OUR BACKS ARE AGAINST THE WALL AND OUR SURVIVAL IS THREATENED, WE WILL ONCE AGAIN BE THE MOUSE THAT ROARED.


WE FREED ANGUILLA IN ‘67 WE WILL DO IT AGAIN IN 2011.

12 January 2011

Proposed Unilateral Electoral Reforms for Tahiti Nui (French Polynesia) Raises Self-Governance Concerns

Territorial Assembly President terms initiative unacceptable

Radio New Zealand International

The French president, Nicolas Sarkozy, says he will push for a change of French Polynesia’s (Tahiti Nui's)electoral system this year in a bid to increase political stability. Mr Sarkozy indicated his engagement in the matter when he addressed a crowd in the French Indian Ocean island of La Reunion.

He says at a time when everybody should devote their energy to face the economic crisis, the chronic political instability is intolerable for the Polynesians who are suffering. Mr Sarkozy says Polynesia deserves better than a vast comedy where yesterday’s foes become today’s allies.

Paris last changed French Polynesia’s electoral system under urgency in 2007 to hold early general elections in 2008. Since then there have been four presidents, with the first of them, Gaston Flosse, being toppled in a no confidence vote a month into his five-year term.

There is now a threat of a fresh no confidence motion to be lodged before the end of the month. The next general election is scheduled in 2013.

The president of the French Polynesian Assembly, Oscar Temaru, is the latest politician to denounce the French President’s warning that Paris will intervene if the territory’s affairs end up in a shambles. Mr. Temaru says the comment by Nicolas Sarkozy is unacceptable, adding that it was France that created a mess in the first place as colonisation has never done any good. He says with the nuclear weapons tests, France has created a more than just a mess whose economic consequences are yet to be measured.

In an interview with the Nouvelles de Tahiti, Mr Temaru says all development that followed the tests have no proper basis and created an artificial economy. But now, he says, France is telling the territory to assume responsibility for its situation.

Paris to take care of things in Tahiti if "mess" continues, Sarkozy warns.

While on a tour of the French Carribean Islands, French President Nicolas Sarkozy talked about the situation in French overseas territories, including French Polynesia. Sarkozy claimed French overseas territories should have a new relationship with Paris. The French president wants local governments to be more responsible.

Sarkozy added however that this does not mean Paris plans to let these territories become independent.

Concerning French Polynesia, Sarkozy said the electoral reform should be completed by the end of the year.
He did not say however if this would lead to snap elections if the months to come. Sarkozy also said that if the political "mess" was to continue in Tahiti, Paris would take care of things. This could clearly mean that the new French High Commissioner could have to make important choices for the budget if political parties fail to vote the 2011 budget for French Polynesia. The current Tong Sang government does not have the 29 seats required to have a majority in the French Polynesian Assembly.


Meanwhile, the Tahiti Presse reported that:

Tahiti's electoral reform will definitely be implemented this year, according to various media reports in Paris.

There has been some delays, however, over the last days. Some Parliament members from Nicolas Sarkozy's right-wing majority have criticized the bill. They reportedly criticized the fact that a bonus of seats was created for some constituencies while other constituencies had no bonus.This is unfair, the two right-wing politicians, Christian Cointat and Didier Quentin, claimed. The bonus of seats in the French Polynesian Asssembly should be implemented for outer islands, such as the Tuamotu archipelago for instance. But the Leeward and Windward Islands, including Tahiti, will have no bonus.

No less than 37 of the 57 French Polynesian Assembly members come from the Windward Islands.
French President Nicolas Sarkozy should go to New Caledonia for the beginning of the Pacific Games in August. He should not however come to French Polynesia.

Last October, Tahiti Presse reported that the three main Tahitian political parties have expressed concern over the proposed electoral changes:

Major Political Parties Sign Resolution against Electoral Reform

The three main Tahitian political parties have expressed concern about the electoral reform French Overseas minister Marie-Luce Penchard prepares for French Polynesia. Penchard gave the outlines of the bill during her stay in Tahiti Oct. 14-17.

The electoral reform provides that the total number of Assembly seats would soon be reduced, going from 57 to 51 or 50. This would be possible by reducing the number of Assembly seats for outer islands (Tuamotu archipelago, Marquesas Islands, Austral Islands).

But the three main political parties, Gaston Tong Sang's pro-autonomy To Tatou Ai'a, Gaston Flosse's pro-autonomy Tahoeraa and Oscar Temaru's pro-independence UPLD, have all said the reform is not satisfactory. They first said it after meeting Penchard in Papeete a few days ago and they have signed Wednesday a resolution criticizing Penchard's project.

They claimed the French Overseas minister has not worked on the reform properly. They also criticized the fact that Penchard said new political leaders should emerge in French Polynesia.

The resolution (was) given to French Polynesia Assembly Speaker Oscar Temaru. He will be in charge of sending the document to French president Nicolas Sarkozy.

The electoral reform could also lead to snap-elections in French Polynesia in 2011. The reform would also make it much more difficult to file and vote a no-confidence motion against the government.

*****

The French Minister responsible for Overseas areas, Marie Luce Penchard outlined her reform proposals during a speech delivered in Papeete on 15th October 2010.

11 January 2011

New Governor of Guahan Calls for ' A Guamanian Century' in 2011 Inaugural Address

******************************************************************************************************


A Guamanian Century
The Inaugural Address of the Honorable Eddie Baza Calvo
Governor of Guahan (Guam)
3rd January 2011 


My Fellow Guamanians,

When I woke up this morning, I saw my beautiful wife, and I thought about my six beautiful kids, and I gave thanks for the gracious favor of the Almighty Lord. Christine, Eddie, Vinson, Rosae, PJ, Melva and Celine, thank you for sharing this tremendous duty and responsibility with me. Thank you, mom and dad, for teaching me that to whom much is given, much is expected.

Before I begin, I want all of you to look upon this chair Christine and I have reserved here in the front. It is a seat for those who cannot be with us tonight. In this celebration of a new government, we start by remembering the unborn and our men and women off at war. From this night forward, you will not be forgotten in our administration.

It is with a deep sense of pride and immense humility that I take to this podium on this clear evening.

Look around this beautiful island. This Cathedral has been here for nearly 400 years. This Plaza represents centuries of government. Not five miles away is the largest harbor in the region. At dusk, hundreds of thousands of people will turn on their lights, and from the heavens, this island will look like the brightest star in a sea of Pacific nations. Resting below latte stones and ancient sites are the spirits of a people reawakened at this hour by the excitement of a new century… a Guamanian Century of pride, prosperity and opportunity.

We’ve gone through our lives never asking for much. We’ve seen challenges and we’ve lived through the good times. We’ve been asked to sacrifice, and we’ve given so freely to those who’ve asked. In the short time all of us have been on this earth, we’ve seen ourselves as a part of someone else’s plan. We’ve waited for what others could offer, or we’ve settled for so much less than we can achieve. No more. Silent for centuries has been our story of greatness and ingenuity. Tonight, our star shines brighter, illuminating our history and our path to tomorrow.

I’ve heard too many times that our lives and interests belong only to this corner of the world. People have said that no one knows about Guam… that nobody cares what we do. I’ve heard critics doubt our ability to compete against the best in the world. They say our children can’t make it because public school test scores are too low. They say our government is broken and cannot change. They say we’re too far from the rest of the world. I tell you this tonight and for the remainder of my time as governor:

We are a very special people… on a very special place… at a very special time. We’ve been here for 4,000 years – one of the earliest inhabited islands of the Pacific. Our civilization began before Moses brought the 10 Commandments down from Mount Sinai. We were around before Rome was built. Guamanians were in control of their destiny before the first republics in Greece, before the Magna Carta, before the French Revolution, and before the Declaration of Independence. Who can question our existence or our contributions? It is time to embrace our identity as Guamanians. We are here, and we should be proud of who we are, where we came from and what we can become.

I am not content with the belief that we are struggling for our corner of the world. In my view, we are working to conquer our challenges and to set the world’s eyes upon us.

The public school system isn’t where we want it to be, but it is not beyond our reach to graduate your children in to rewarding careers. The traffic on the roads today and the lack of water and sewer services for many families are problems we can one day put in our past. The government has a large debt and a hard time paying its bills, but the fiscal crisis isn’t so insurmountable that we should give up and let others take over. There are problems everywhere, but only two roads to take. We can dwell on the challenges and surrender centuries of resolve against the odds. Or, we can be bold and proud. We can exemplify the highest virtues of Guamanians and lead change for ourselves.

Most importantly, we must do this together. With the new year and the people’s expectation for a new direction, Lt. Governor Tenorio and I are leaving in the past the politics of division and partisanship. We bring to our Cabinet people fully dedicated and completely committed to selfless public service. They have big hearts, new ideas and a strong determination to do what is right.

I know that sometimes doing what is right isn’t always popular. But, you’ve elected 15 extraordinary men and women to help Lt. Governor Tenorio and I make the tough decisions we need to overcome the challenges. Indeed, the vision of Guam I share with you tonight is nothing novel. I know the 15 senators you elected. They are our friends. Our belief in the greatness of Guam transcends all political lines. I would be remiss if tonight I did not reopen the lines of communication and invite my colleagues, Democrat and Republican, to this new and exciting direction.

As servants of the people, we need each other to make things right. The public and future generations deserve it. Given your talents and core values, I know there really isn’t one issue we cannot tackle or address together. Your partnership is necessary for success.

This is the challenge I place before all Guamanians today. We are in the advent of the single-largest economic buildup in our history. It will be our buildup, or someone else’s. We can lead this change. Unabashed and unwavering, we can work hard and stand tall. We can join each other with a common vision of strong families and better days. Why not? If 500 years ago, we could build the fastest sea vessel in the world without anyone’s help, then today excellence is only within reach.

And how? How can we, a people who struggle with so many challenges, conquer this future and live out our dreams? As a people, we’ve answered that question over and over for 4,000 years. No one helped us to engineer and erect latte stones. We did that on our own. No one taught us how to preserve food with salt hundreds of years before refrigeration. We learned that ourselves. And while the Spaniards, the Dutch and the English were trying desperately to navigate the world on the high seas, our proa was flying right past them, built alone by the hands of the people of Guam.

There is nothing we cannot do. My fellow Guamanians, we can build the Guamanian Century, and it will be built by the Guamanian Dream.

In these times of change and great uncertainty, everywhere we are looking for heroes. Look no where but among ourselves, for the greatness of our Guamanian Century rests within each of us. It is your contribution that will make the difference.

Without compromise or question… with commitment and sacrifice… we can rise well above the expectations of our great history. We will not accept the hand we are dealt. We will not go quietly in to the night. We will turn to our children and tell them the future belongs to them. That they can compete against the best in the world… and win.

One day, it will be your child who people will go to for the latest in medical technology. One day, the most important innovation will bear the name of a Guamanian inventor. Countless Guamanians will be called “experts” or “preeminent” or “prolific” or ”masters”. Guamanians have the talent, intelligence, drive, and passion to be the best at whatever they set their minds on. The sky is the limit.

One of your children will stand where I am standing 20 years from now. And on that night, because of the work that begins today, Guam will be stronger and her star will shine brighter.

I have this impenetrable faith in our future, because we are Guamanians.

Irony and destiny surrounded the eve of this inauguration, this peaceful yet significant changing of government. The irony is that I am a proud American citizen, and at the same time, a proud Chamorro Guamanian who believes unwaveringly in the greatness of Guam. It may seem difficult to reconcile such allegiances in light of actions the federal government has taken recently. But, three days after Christmas, the story of a man named Darrell Doss put everything in to perspective.

Darrell Doss is an American hero and a Guamanian liberator. He came to our island 66 years ago to free us from our occupiers. He fell in love with Guam. He longed to be part of us. He looked upon this place, leveled by bombs and war, and he said it was the most beautiful place he’d ever seen. Interestingly, on July 23, seven years ago, Darrell Doss wrote about our political status:

"Fifty-nine years ago, on July 21, 1944, I and more than 57,000 Marines, soldiers and sailors came ashore on the beaches of Asan and Agat, and were honored to be referred to as ‘liberators.’ But in the end, we failed to accomplish what we had come to do -- liberate you.

“More correctly, our government failed both of us by not granting the people of Guam full citizenship. Another injustice is not allowing Guam to have equal say, as we in the states do in governing your island home. Please remember, we men who landed on your shores July 21, 1944, shall never be fully satisfied until you are fully liberated."

A man with no ties to this place except a memory of its people stood up for us and, more importantly, considered himself one of us. He said, and I quote, “Thank you, my fellow Chamorros, for in my heart I am one of you.”

My fellow Guamanians, even heroes look up to us. Even they recognize what is so special about this land. It is time for us to reclaim that pride and to work toward what we all know we can do.

We are instruments of a greater power… called to action with a larger purpose… reawakened for a higher cause. We know what to do and we have the courage to do it.

This is the land of the proa and the home of the Guamanian. This is our land.

Banidosu yu na Chamorro… and I call on you, all Guamanians, to be strong and to stand tall… Fanhogge Chamorro… for the future belongs to us.

Si Yu’us Ma’ase yan Si Yu’us en Fan’Bee-Nen-Deesee I Islan Guam.





10 January 2011

Rapa Nui Activist on Hunger Strike

Radio New Zealand International



Erity Teave

Reports from Santiago say a leading Rapa Nui activist has begun a hunger strike in the Chilean capital in protest at the latest evictions on Easter Island.

Erity Teave, who is the human rights spokesperson of the so-called Rapa Nui Parliament, has likened the president of Chile, Sebastian Pinera, to a dictator after continued police actions to remove Rapa Nui from premises they claim as ancestral lands.

Mr Pinera had defended the use of special police forces, saying it was the state’s duty to uphold the law and to maintain public order.

But Ms Teave has told the Mexican news agency, Notimex, that she will be on hunger strike until she has been received by parliament to present her demands. She says her people are exposed to inconceivable repression and described the police actions as atrocities and terrorism.

Ms Teave says she expects the dispute between the Rapa Nui and the state of Chile will be resolved through the Inter American Commission of Human Rights.
********

Public Declaration From The National Institute Of Human Rights in the Situation in Rapanui

as published in Indigenous Peoples Issues and Resources
http://indigenouspeoplesissues.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=8296:rapanui-public-declaration-from-the-national-institute-of-human-rights&catid=53:south-america-indigenous-peoples&Itemid=75

Translated from Spanish, Original Below


In connection with the events of yesterday (Dec. 29) in Rapa Nui, which affect groups of native inhabitants who occupied the square in Riro Kainga in Hanga Roa several months, the National Instute of Human Rights states:


1 .- The State of Chile has ratified the ILO Convention 169 on Indigenous and Tribal Peoples in Independent Countries, which is fully in force in our domestic legislation since 2009. Chile also attended the adoption of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, where he pledged to promote respect for and full application of the rights there and to ensure its effectiveness.

These international instruments, the State of Chile assumes, among others, the commitment to safeguard the right of ownership and possession of the original peoples of the lands they traditionally occupied, to establish adequate mechanisms for identification and protection, and appropriate procedures under the national legal system to resolve land claims by the peoples concerned.

2 .- The State of Chile has thus obliged to respect and ensure indigenous rights and adapt its rules and institutions embody the rules that essentially respect for the culture, institutions and ways of life of indigenous peoples and timely consultation on all matters that might affect them.

In doing so, the State of Chile has decided to give priority to the historical claims of indigenous peoples, understanding and respectful of multiculturalism, different logic to the one appeal to use force in defense alleged the rule of law, as has unfortunately occurred in Rapa Nui.

3. The lack of effective mechanisms for the restitution of ancestral lands and misuse of force constitutes a serious affront to indigenous rights, a situation which has been observed repeatedly by international human rights bodies, in particular the UN Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights and fundamental freedoms of indigenous peoples, Mr. James Anaya and the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights.

4 .- The National Institute of Human Rights deplores the excessive use of force in place of dialogue and moderation that international commitments and prudence demand, so we made a call on the Government to restore the conditions for a peaceful settlement , in harmonic terms with the obligations and standards contained in Convention 169, the UN Declaration and other relevant human rights instruments.


Spanish Original

Rapa Nui: Declaración Pública del Instituto Nacional de Derechos Humanos


En relación con los hechos ocurridos el día de ayer (Dec. 29) en Rapa Nui, los que afectan a grupos de habitantes originarios que ocupaban la plaza Riro Kainga en Hanga Roa desde hace varios meses, el Instituto Nacional de Derechos Humanos declara lo siguiente:


1.- El Estado de Chile ha ratificado el Convenio 169 de la OIT sobre pueblos Indígenas y Tribales en Países Independientes, el que se encuentra plenamente vigente en nuestro ordenamiento interno desde 2009. Además, Chile concurrió a la aprobación de la Declaración de las Naciones Unidas sobre los derechos de los pueblos indígenas, en donde se comprometió a promover el respeto y la plena aplicación de los derechos reconocidos ahí y a velar por su eficacia.

En estos instrumentos internacionales, el Estado de Chile asume, entre otros, el compromiso de salvaguardar el derecho de propiedad y posesión de los pueblos originarios sobre las tierras que tradicionalmente han ocupado; a establecer mecanismos adecuados para su determinación y protección, así como procedimientos apropiados en el marco del sistema jurídico nacional para solucionar las reivindicaciones de tierras formuladas por los pueblos interesados.

2.- El Estado de Chile se ha obligado con ello a respetar y asegurar los derechos indígenas y adecuar sus normas e instituciones a las normas que los consagran, esencialmente el respeto a la cultura, instituciones y formas de vida de los pueblos originarios y a la consulta oportuna sobre todas aquellas cuestiones que pudieran afectarlas.

Al hacerlo, el Estado de Chile ha decidido dar prioridad a las reivindicaciones históricas de los pueblos indígenas, comprensivos y respetuosos de la interculturalidad, lógica distinta a la sola apelación al uso de la fuerza en supuesta defensa del Estado de Derecho, como ha ocurrido lamentablemente en Rapa Nui.

3. La falta de mecanismos eficaces para la restitución de tierras ancestrales y la utilización abusiva de la fuerza constituye una grave afrenta a los derechos indígenas, situación que ha sido observada recurrentemente por organismos internacionales de Derechos Humanos , en particular por el Relator Especial de Naciones Unidas sobre la situación de los derechos humanos y libertades fundamentales de los pueblos indígenas, Sr. James Anaya y por la Comisión Interamericana de Derechos Humanos.

4.- El Instituto Nacional de Derechos Humanos deplora el uso desmedido de la fuerza en reemplazo del diálogo y la moderación que los compromisos internacionales y la prudencia exigen, por lo que formulamos un llamado al Gobierno a reponer las condiciones para una solución pacífica del conflicto, en términos armónicos con las obligaciones y criterios contenidos en el Convenio 169, la Declaración de la ONU y los demás instrumentos de DDHH pertinentes.




09 January 2011

US Congress Reverses Conditional Vote for Delegates of US Dependencies in Caribbean/Pacific

Territories' Vote in US House Committee of the Whole had only counted if it did not affect the final result in passage of legislation. "One step forward, two steps backward."


Capitol Building Picture

Congressional Record
Debate in US House of Representatives
Rules of the House of Representatives
05 th January 2011
(emphasis added)
________________________________________


(Page: H16)

Ms. SLAUGHTER. Madam Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the gentlewoman from the District of Columbia (Ms. Norton) who, as I said, is disenfranchised by this rule. Millions of Americans will be underrepresented.

Ms. NORTON. I thank the gentle lady from New York for yielding.

Madam Speaker, for myself and for the Delegates from American Samoa, Guam, the U.S. Virgin Islands, the Northern Mariana Islands, the resident commissioner of Puerto Rico, I offered a motion earlier that the House conduct a full and complete study of the constitutionality of the vote in the Committee of the Whole for the Delegates which is eliminated by this rule. This is nearly the same motion that the Republicans offered when we first were granted the right to vote on the House floor. The delegate vote was challenged by the Republicans in the courts and found to be constitutional, however.

Madam Speaker, this vote is a mere recognition of our American citizenship. The Delegates are no different from others in this House. It is one thing not to have the vote. It is quite another to be stripped of your vote. The vote is said to be symbolic by some. Well, to us it is symbolic. It is symbolic of the American citizenship of our constituents. It meant everything to us. There are differences among us, of course, but we ask you to think again about this vote and to restore the vote of the Delegates on the floor in the Committee of the Whole.

…..

Ms. SLAUGHTER. Mr. Speaker, for the purpose of a unanimous consent request, I yield to the gentleman from Puerto Rico (Mr. Pierluisi).

(Mr. PIERLUISI asked and was given permission to revise and extend his remarks.)

Mr. PIERLUISI. Mr. Speaker, I rise in opposition to the resolution.

• [Begin Insert]

Mr. Speaker, I rise in strong opposition to the Republican rules package, because it sends a message of exclusion and indifference to my constituents and those of my fellow delegates from the other U.S. territories and the District of Columbia.

As the Resident Commissioner from Puerto Rico, I represent nearly four million U.S. citizens, far more than any other member of this Chamber. Together, the delegates from the other U.S. territories and the District of Columbia represent over one million people. Our constituents are part of the American family. They pledge allegiance to the same flag as their fellow Americans in the 50 states. They fight--and many of them have died--in defense of our nation.

Under a rule in place for the last three Democratic-controlled Congresses, the Representatives from the territories and the District were given a single, extremely circumscribed privilege on the House floor. We were permitted to vote on amendments when the House resolved into the Committee of the Whole, a parliamentary device designed to allow greater participation by Members in debate. The rule provided for an automatic revote to be held in the exceedingly rare instance where our votes affected the outcome. This rule was upheld by the federal courts and did not impede the work of this House in any way.

This simple privilege promoted responsible and transparent government. By obligating us to take public stands on issues of importance, it enabled our constituents to better evaluate both our governing philosophy and the quality of our representation. The privilege also sent a clear moral message--a message of inclusiveness--conveying to our constituents that their voices counted.

In a move that is as unnecessary as it is unjust, the Republican package will deprive us of this privilege, which may have been small in their eyes, but which held significant meaning for us and those we represent. The Republican package dishonors men and women from the territories and the District of Columbia. And in so doing, it does grave damage to the principles of equality and justice that our constituents, side by side with all of your constituents, fight to defend here at home and in distant lands. This is a true shame.

• [End Insert]

Ms. SLAUGHTER. I yield to the Delegate from Guam, Delegate Bordallo.

(Ms. BORDALLO asked and was given permission to revise and extend her remarks.)

Ms. BORDALLO. Mr. Speaker, I rise in opposition to the resolution.

• [Begin Insert]

Mr. Speaker, the Republican rules package makes this body less transparent and less responsive to the American people. By obligating the Delegates to take public stands, our limited vote showed our constituents where we stood on important issues. Our vote also helped ensure legislation considered by the House took our constituents into account. When an amendment came forward last Congress regarding the transfer of detainees from Guantanamo into the U.S., the territories were initially excluded from the prohibition. Our vote compelled the House to address our concerns. This is precisely how representative democracy is meant to work.

• [End Insert]

Ms. SLAUGHTER. I yield to the Delegate from the Virgin Islands, Dr. Christensen.

(Mrs. CHRISTENSEN asked and was given permission to revise and extend her remarks.)

• [Begin Insert]

Mr. Speaker, I rise in opposition to the Rules Package which once again removes the opportunity for Delegates to Congress and the Resident Commissioner to vote on amendments in the Committee of the Whole. It was our privilege in the past two Congresses to vote along with our colleagues on issues of importance to all Americans, especially the over 4 million of us who live and work in the U.S. territories.

The people of the U.S. territories are a diverse group, much like their fellow citizens on the mainland. Some are born in the territories under the American flag, some have migrated there and embraced our culture and our values before naturalization, others were born in the states and have chosen by virtue of their chosen occupation or by love of our islands to make the territories their home. All are Americans in every sense of the word, except for full representation in the House of Representatives and the ability to vote for the President of the United States.

Mr. Speaker, the people of the U.S. territories have served their country in all of its

(Page: H17)

conflicts from the American Revolution to the recent conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan. They have given their youth, their time and even their lives for our country. We had hoped through our participation to obtain the good will of all of our colleagues to ensure full participation in the democratic process for all citizens of our country. The events of this week have proved to us once more that we still have a long way to go to ensure equality and justice for all.

• [End Insert]

Ms. SLAUGHTER. I yield to the gentleman from American Samoa (Mr. Faleomavaega).

(Mr. FALEOMAVAEGA asked and was given permission to revise and extend his remarks.)

Mr. FALEOMAVAEGA. Mr. Speaker, on behalf of the tens of thousands of our men and women in military uniform from the U.S. territories, I just ask my good friend, the Honorable Speaker, restore our symbolic vote. That's all we are asking for.

• [Begin Insert]

Mr. Speaker, the proposed rules by the Republicans for the 112th Congress give unfair treatment to some 5 million Americans residing in the U.S. territories. In particular, it eliminates the rule that allows the Delegates to vote when the House resolves into the Committee of the Whole, and that provides for an automatic revote in the full House when such vote is the deciding margin.

The U.S. Court of Appeals has upheld the Delegate vote on the basis that there is automatic reconsideration of votes in the House when the Delegate vote is decisive. Automatic reconsideration preserves the House proper as the sole arbiter for changes made in the legislation that the House considers.

During the three Congresses in which the rule has been in place, the record shows that the Delegate vote in the Committee of the Whole has not in any way hindered the work of the House. From 1993 to 2010, the House had a total of 132 separate votes demanded in the House on first degree amendments reported from the Committee of the Whole. In the same period, only four such amendments were reconsidered as a result of the Delegates being the deciding votes. this proves that the Delegates vote does not impede the work of the House.

While symbolic, the Delegate vote is important for transparency and political accountability. It compels us, representatives of the U.S. Territories, to make public our views and positions on issues of national interest that are important to our constituents. Hence, the constituents are able to make an informed decision to elect those that better represent their views.

Above all, the Delegate vote underscores fairness and has moral implications for the institution and this great nation. As part of the American family, a disproportionate number of our sons and daughters are fighting in the U.S. military in defense of the values and principles upon which this country was founded.

A statistical profile of Americans killed in the war in Iraq shows my district, the U.S. Territory of American Samoa, has the highest rate of deaths per 1 million population in all of the United States. Just last month, I attended the funeral of another soldier from my district killed in Iraq. Staff Sergeant Loleni Gandy, originally from American Samoa, was 36 years old, and has served in the U.S. Army for 17 years. He is survived by his wife and four young sons who now have to cope with the loss of their father. Like Americans in other States, the love and loyalty my people feel for the United States remains unchanged.

It is disconcerting therefore that under the new rules proposed for the 112th Congress, the Delegates are stripped of the power to vote in the Committee of the Whole. This is an affront to the tremendous sacrifice made by Americans in the Territories and further restricted what modest representation they have in Congress.

I urge my friends on the other side to reverse course and reinstate the rule to allow the Delegates to vote in the Committee of the Whole.

• [End Insert]


(Analysis of the) Congressional Research Service
Dec. 23, 2010

Parliamentary Rights of the Delegates and Resident Commissioner From Puerto Rico
(By Christopher M. Davis, Analyst on Congress and the Legislative Process)


SUMMARY


As officers who represent territories and properties possessed or administered by the United States but not admitted to statehood, the five House Delegates and the Resident Commissioner from Puerto Rico are not Members of Congress, and do not enjoy all the same parliamentary rights as Members. They may vote and otherwise act similarly to Members in legislative committee;  may


[Page: H18]

not vote in the House, but may participate in debate and make most motions there; and, under the rules of the 111th Congress (2009-2010), may preside over, and vote in, Committee of the Whole subject to an immediate revote in the House if their votes are decisive.


A proposed rules change for the 112th Congress (2011-2012) released by the House Republican leadership in December of 2010 would, if subsequently adopted by the House, eliminate the right of the Delegates and Resident Commissioner to vote in, or preside over, the Committee of the Whole.


This report will be updated as circumstances warrant.


INTRODUCTION


The offices of the Resident Commissioner from Puerto Rico and the Delegates to the House of Representatives from American Samoa, the District of Columbia, Guam, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands are created by statute, not by the Constitution. Because they represent territories and associated jurisdictions, not states, they are not Members of Congress and do not possess the same parliamentary rights afforded Members. This report examines the parliamentary rights of the Delegates and the Resident Commissioner in legislative committee, in the House, and in the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union.


IN LEGISLATIVE COMMITTEE


Under Clause 3 of Rule III, the Delegates and the Resident Commissioner are elected to serve on standing committees in the same manner as Representatives and have the same parliamentary powers and privileges as Representatives there--the right to question witnesses, to debate, offer amendments, vote, offer motions, raise points of order, include additional views in committee reports, accrue seniority, and chair committees and subcommittees. The same rule authorizes the Speaker to appoint Delegates and the Resident Commissioner to conference committees as well as to service on select and joint committees.


IN THE HOUSE


The Delegates and the Resident Commissioner may not vote in or preside over the House. While they take an oath to uphold the Constitution, they are not included on the Clerk's roll of Members-elect, and may not vote for Speaker. They may not file or sign discharge petitions. They may, however, sponsor and cosponsor legislation, participate in debate, including managing time, and offer any motion which a Representative may make, except the motion to reconsider. A Delegate or Resident Commissioner may raise points of order and questions of personal privilege, call a Member to order, appeal rulings of the chair, file reports for committees, object to the consideration of a bill, and move impeachment proceedings.


IN COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE HOUSE ON THE STATE OF THE UNION


Under Rule III and Rule XVIII, as adopted in the 111th Congress (2009-2010), when the House is sitting as the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, the Delegates and Resident Commissioner have the same right to vote as Representatives, subject to immediate reconsideration in the House when their recorded votes ``have been decisive'' in the Committee. House rules also authorize the Speaker to appoint a Delegate or the Resident Commissioner to preside as Chairman of the Committee of the Whole.


The rules of the 111th Congress are identical in effect to those in force in the 110th Congress (2007-2008) and before that, in the 103rd Congress (1993-1994), which permitted the Delegates and the Resident Commissioner to vote in, and to preside over, the Committee of the Whole. These provisions were stricken from the rules as adopted in the 104th Congress (1995-1996) and remained out of effect until readopted in the 110th Congress. At the time of the adoption of the 1993 rule, then-Minority Leader Robert H. Michel and 12 other Representatives filed suit against the Clerk of the House and the territorial delegates, seeking a declaration that the rule was unconstitutional. The constitutionality of the rule was ultimately upheld on appeal based on its inclusion of the mechanism for automatic reconsideration of votes in the House. A draft of the proposed rules package for the 112th Congress (2011-2012) released by the House Republican leadership on December 23, 2010, would amend Rules III and XVIII to eliminate the ability of the Delegates and the Resident Commissioner to vote in, or preside over, the Committee of the Whole.


The votes of the Delegates and the Resident Commissioner were decisive, and thus subject to automatic revote by the House, on three occasions in the 103rd Congress. There were no instances identified in the 110th Congress in which the votes of the Delegates and the Resident Commissioner were decisive. In the 111th Congress, the votes of the delegates were decisive, and subject to an automatic revote, on one occasion.


The rule governing voting in the Committee of the Whole by Delegates and the Resident Commissioner has not been interpreted to mean that any recorded vote with a difference of six votes or less is subject to automatic reconsideration. In determining whether the votes of the Delegates and the Resident Commissioner were decisive, the Chair follows a ``but for'' test--namely, would the result of a vote have been different if the Delegates and the Commissioner had not voted? If the votes of the Delegates and the Resident Commissioner on a question are determined to be decisive by this standard, the committee automatically rises and the Speaker puts the question to a vote. The vote is first put by voice, and any Representative may, with a sufficient second, obtain a record vote. Once the final result of the vote is announced, the Committee of the Whole automatically resumes its sitting.


Ms. SLAUGHTER. I yield for the purpose of a unanimous consent request to the gentleman from the Northern Mariana Islands (Mr. Sablan).


(Mr. SABLAN asked and was given permission to revise and extend his remarks.)


• [Begin Insert]


Mr. Speaker, the people of the Northern Mariana Islands are citizens of the United States. And the Constitution declares we are ``subject to the jurisdiction thereof.'' But today the majority's Rules exclude us from even symbolic representation in our government.


The Pledge to America declared the majority would fight those who whisper America's standing as the world leader of democracy is ending. But today the majority breaks its own Pledge with Rules that take away the vote from 5 million Americans.


What a sad way to begin this new Congress.


[End Insert]



Ms. SLAUGHTER. I yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from Maryland (Mr. Hoyer), the minority whip.
…..

Secondly, I oppose this rule, as do my friends from the various territories, from Puerto Rico, from the Virgin Islands, the District of Columbia, and the Pacific Islands (sic). We talked about, during the course of the campaign, listening to people. We have almost 5 million people who are American citizens. How do we listen to them? We listen to them when their Representatives put their green or red on the board.

I will be introducing a resolution tomorrow, which will be referred to the Rules Committee, and I hope you will consider it.

The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr. Latham). The time of the gentleman from Maryland has expired.

Ms. SLAUGHTER. I yield the gentleman 1 additional minute.

Mr. HOYER. I thank the gentle lady.

I was telling my friend, the chairman of the Rules Committee, congratulations to him for his obtaining the chairmanship. A thoughtful and hardworking Member of this House will chair the Rules Committee. I am going to be introducing an amendment to the rules that, my presumption is, we will adopt today which will return this symbol of respect, this symbol of inclusion, this symbol of colleagueship, if you will, to our six representatives of American citizens.

I hope my friend will hold hearings on that. I would like to testify on that issue.

And I say to my friends that I hope we reject these rules so that we can… ensure the inclusion, in a real and meaningful way, but not constitutionally objectionable way, our friends who represent the District of Columbia and our territories.

…..

The vote was taken by electronic device, and there were--yeas 238, nays 188, not voting 7

See also: http://cruciansinfocus.com/2011/01/31/losing-a-vote-really/#more-9473


08 January 2011

Former Montserrat Chief Minister John Osbourne Joins the Ancestors

Consistent advocate for increased autonomy for the territory





BRADES, Montserrat – Montserrat is once again in mourning at the news that former Chief Minister John A. Osborne has passed away. Osborne’s daughter Shirley Osborne sent a statement from the family announcing his passing:

“John A. Osborne, the father with whom we have shared the most intense love and affection, has died. He left us peacefully early Sunday morning. We have lost the irreplaceable centre of our family and an incomparable presence in all our lives, but his wisdom, courage, and irrepressible spirit will live with us forever,” the statement read.

The former chief minister had been in hospital in the United States for the past several months. There has been no official word as to plans for his burial although he is to be honored with a full state funeral.

In November 2009, the late chief minister was honored for his years of service as a politician and member of the Legislative Council. John A. Osborne was Montserrat’s longest serving statesman with a career that spanned 38 years in the Legislative Council.

In 2005, the airport was renamed the John A. Osborne Airport in tribute to his legacy of service to the people of Montserrat. He first became chief minister in 1978 as a member of the People’s Liberation Movement and continued until losing the elections in 1991. He then went on to serve again as chief minister from April 5 2001 until June 3, 2006 when he resigned after his party lost the elections.

Former Chief Minister of Montserrat John A. Osborne was 75. He leaves to mourn a wife and several children, including Parliamentary Secretary David Osborne.

St. Kitts and Nevis mourns passing of former Montserrat chief minister


BASSETERRE, ST. KITTS, JANUARY 7TH 2011 (CUOPM) – St. Kitts and Nevis has joined other Caribbean nations in mourning the death of former Chief Minister of Montserrat, Dr. John Osborne.

The Hon. Dr. Denzil L. Douglas, Prime Minister of St. Kitts and Nevis in a message to the Hon. Reuben Meade, Chief Minister of Montserrat expressed the profound sadness of his Government and the people of St. Kitts and Nevis and extended deepest and heartfelt sympathies to the Government and people of Montserrat, and in particular to the family of Dr. Osborne, who died last weekend in the United States.

“John Osborne’s long and distinguished career, where he sought to ensure that the people of Montserrat could stand proudly with their CARICOM Colleagues and make a positive contribution to the debate on the direction of the Caribbean, was an inspiration, not only to the people of Montserrat, but to the entire region,” said Prime Minsier Douglas.

“As your country mourns the passing of a Caribbean son, be comforted by the fact that we share in your moment of bereavement,” said Dr. Douglas.

CMC in a profile on its website said as Chief Minister of the tiny British colony of Montserrat, Dr. John Osborne had regarded his island as being just as important as any of the 15 member Caribbean Community (CARICOM) grouping. In fact at one point, he walked out of a CARICOM meeting after the name plate for his island was incorrectly spelt.

Osborne, who died in the United States on Sunday after a prolonged illness, had sought desperately in the 1980’s to push for political independence from Britain.

Osborne first became the head of the island’s government in 1978 when he led the People’s Liberation Movement (PLM) to victory at the polls. He served for 13 years in Montserrat’s highest political office until his party’s electoral defeat at the hand of the National Progressive Party (NPP) in 1991. It was a sobering defeat for Osborne, who also lost his legislative seat.

Osborne reclaimed his seat at the 1996 election and sat as an opposition member as the leader of the short-lived Progressive People’s Alliance.


In 2001, he made a triumphant return as Chief Minister after leading the revamped New People’s Liberation Movement (NPLM) to a resounding victory over the NPP. Despite suffering a number of defections from his government, Osborne held on to power until the 2006 polls. He then served as a government minister in a coalition government headed by his former NPLM deputy Dr. Lowell Lewis after no party won an outright majority.

Osborne retired from active politics ahead of the last general election in 2009, but his legacy lives on in the form of his son, David, who is a parliamentary secretary in the present government. The Gerald’s Airport was renamed the John A. Osborne Airport in 2008.

07 January 2011

Frank Bonilla, Scholar of Puerto Rican Studies, Dies at 85

Was the Director of the Center for Puerto Rican Studies at Hunter College in New York.


By Dennis Hevesi 
New York Times

Frank Bonilla, an academic who grew up in two of New York’s poorest neighborhoods, faced segregation in the Midwest and went on to create one of the nation’s first college-level Puerto Rican studies programs and its first consortium for Latino studies, died on Dec. 28 in Escondido, Calif. He was 85.

For 20 years, starting in 1973, Dr. Bonilla was the director of the Center for Puerto Rican Studies at Hunter College in New York. Already a renowned Latin American studies scholar, he had joined with other professors, students and community activists in pressing the City University of New York to open the center.

Under Dr. Bonilla’s leadership, the program integrated various strands of Puerto Rican studies — history, politics, economics and cultural development — with the aim of exposing the forces behind ethnic and racial prejudice. The center, which studied the colonial relationship between Puerto Rico and the mainland and analyzed the extensive post-World War II migration from the island, houses one of the nation’s largest archives on the Puerto Rican experience.

One of Dr. Bonilla’s most influential projects was the Inter-University Program for Latino Research, which he co-founded in 1986. It began as a national consortium of eight university-based research centers and grew to include more than 20 universities that cooperate in interdisciplinary research. Among other studies, the program has analyzed the impact of global, national and regional economic forces on the earnings of Latinos in the United States.

“Dr. Bonilla was this high-powered intellectual taking the lead in bringing together key institutions,” said Félix Matos Rodríguez, the president of Hostos Community College in the Bronx and a former director of the Puerto Rican research center. “Nobody had the combination of profound credibility and the trust of academicians, elected officials and community leaders in the trenches to research problems like persistent poverty, lack of access to education, segmented labor markets and the difficulties for immigrants facing entry into institutions in the U.S.”

Born in Manhattan on Feb. 3, 1925, Frank Bonilla was one of three children of Francisco and Maria Bonilla, who had moved from Puerto Rico. He grew up in East Harlem and the South Bronx, but for several years lived with family friends in Tennessee and Illinois, where he came face to face with segregation: he was regularly told to sit in the back of the bus.

After graduating from high school, Dr. Bonilla served in the Army during World War II. He graduated from City College in 1949 and earned a master’s degree in sociology from New York University in 1954 and a doctorate in sociology from Harvard in 1959.

Dr. Bonilla began his academic career in 1960 as a member of the American Universities Field Service, doing research in South America. In a 1962 report, “Rural Reform in Brazil,” he found that 75 percent of the farmland was owned by 8 percent of the farmers, and that two-thirds of the rural population was illiterate and therefore could not vote.

He went on to teach political science at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology from 1963 to 1969, and at Stanford from 1969 to 1972. He then returned to New York to begin work on creating the Center for Puerto Rican Studies.

Besides his daughter Natasha, Dr. Bonilla is survived by another daughter, Sandra Bailey; a son, Francisco; a sister, Esther Miller; five grandchildren; and one great-grandson.

04 January 2011

UN Adopts 2011 Decolonisation Recommendations for Island Territories


UN General Assembly approves resolutions specific to Caribbean and Pacific Dependencies after some texts were amended by the UN Fourth Committee. 


 American Samoa
  
The United Nations Fourth Committee made the following changes to the recommended resolution of the Decolonisation Committee.

(a) Operative paragraph 1, which read:

“1. Welcomes the work of the territorial Government and legislature
with regard to the recommendations made by the Future Political Status Study
Commission in preparation for American Samoa’s fourth constitutional
convention, to be held in 2010 to address issues related to the future status of
American Samoa, and commends the efforts of the territorial Government to
enhance public awareness of the ongoing preparations for submitting
constitutional amendments”,

was replaced by:

“1. Takes note of the proposed amendments to the 1967 revised
Constitution of American Samoa adopted at the fourth Constitutional
Convention held in June 2010”;

(b) Operative paragraph 2, which read:

“2. Calls upon the administering Power to assist the Territory by
facilitating its work concerning the intention of holding the fourth
constitutional convention in 2010, if requested”,

was replaced by:

“2. Welcomes the work of the territorial Government and legislature in
accordance with the recommendations made by the Future Political Status
Study Commission in preparation for the fourth Constitutional Convention,
and commends the related efforts of the territorial Government to enhance
public awareness of the Convention”;

 The amended text of the resolution was adopted by the General Assembly as follows:

American Samoa

Taking note of the working paper prepared by the Secretariat on American
Samoa and other relevant information,

Aware that under United States law the Secretary of the Interior has
administrative jurisdiction over American Samoa,

Noting the position of the administering Power and the statements made by
representatives of American Samoa in regional seminars inviting the Special
Committee on the Situation with regard to the Implementation of the Declaration on
the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples to send a visiting
mission to the Territory,

Aware of the work of the Future Political Status Study Commission, completed
in 2006, the release of its report, with recommendations, in January 2007, and the
creation of the American Samoa Constitutional Review Committee in the Territory,
as well as the holding in June 2010 of American Samoa’s fourth Constitutional
Convention,

Noting, in that regard, the statement made by the Governor of American
Samoa at the Pacific regional seminar held in Nouméa from 18 to 20 May 2010, and
previous policy papers presented to the Special Committee, in which he stated that,
while the Territory’s status was akin to being self-governing, it was time to forge a
more collaborative approach between the Territory and the administering Power,

Acknowledging the indication by the territorial Government that the effects of
certain federal laws on the Territory’s economy are serious cause for concern,
Aware that American Samoa continues to be the only United States Territory to
receive financial assistance from the administering Power for the operations of the
territorial Government,

1. Takes note of the proposed amendments to the 1967 revised Constitution
of American Samoa adopted at the fourth Constitutional Convention held in June
2010;

2. Welcomes the work of the territorial Government and legislature in
accordance with the recommendations made by the Future Political Status Study
Commission in preparation for the fourth Constitutional Convention, and commends
the related efforts of the territorial Government to enhance public awareness of the
Convention;

3. Expresses appreciation for the invitation extended in 2010 to the Special
Committee on the Situation with regard to the Implementation of the Declaration on
the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples by the Governor of
American Samoa to send a visiting mission to the Territory, calls upon the
administering Power to facilitate such a mission if the territorial Government so
desires, and requests the Chair of the Special Committee to take all the steps
necessary to that end;

4. Requests the administering Power to assist the Territory by facilitating its
work concerning a public awareness programme recommended by the Future
Political Status Study Commission in its 2007 report, consistent with Article 73 b of
the Charter of the United Nations, and, in that regard, calls upon the relevant United
Nations organizations to provide assistance to the Territory, if requested;

5. Calls upon the administering Power to assist the territorial Government
in the diversification and sustainability of the economy of the Territory and to
address employment and cost-of-living issues;

Anguilla

The General Assembly adopted the following resolution on Anguilla:

Taking note of the working paper prepared by the Secretariat on Anguilla9 and
other relevant information,

Recalling the holding of the 2003 Caribbean regional seminar in Anguilla,
hosted by the territorial Government and made possible by the administering Power,
the first time that the seminar had been held in a Non-Self-Governing Territory,
Recalling also the statement of the representative of Anguilla at the Caribbean
regional seminar, held in Frigate Bay, Saint Kitts and Nevis, from 12 to 14 May
2009,

Noting the internal constitutional review process resumed by the territorial
Government in 2006, the work of the Constitutional and Electoral Reform
Commission, which prepared its report in August 2006, the holding of public and
other consultative meetings in 2007 on proposed constitutional amendments to be
presented to the administering Power, and the 2008 decision to set up a drafting
team consisting of territorial Government officials, members of the House of
Assembly and lawyers to draft a new constitution, as well as the presentation of the
draft constitution for public consultation in the Territory in 2009 and the expectation
that the draft text will be further discussed with the United Kingdom of Great
Britain and Northern Ireland in 2010, with the aim of seeking full internal
self-government,

Aware that the Government intends to continue its commitment to high-end
tourism and the implementation of various regulations in the financial services
sector,

Noting the participation of the Territory as an associate member in the
Caribbean Community, the Organization of Eastern Caribbean States and the
Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean,

1. Welcomes the presentation of a new constitution for public consultation
in 2009 with the aim of further discussing the new constitution with the
administering Power in 2010;

2. Requests the administering Power to assist the Territory in its current
efforts with regard to advancing the internal constitutional review exercise, if
requested;

3. Stresses the importance of the previously expressed desire of the
territorial Government for a visiting mission by the Special Committee, calls upon
the administering Power to facilitate such a mission, if the territorial Government so
desires, and requests the Chair of the Special Committee to take all the necessary
steps to that end;

4. Requests the administering Power to assist the Territory by facilitating its
work concerning public consultative outreach efforts, consistent with Article 73 b of
the Charter of the United Nations, and, in this regard, calls upon the relevant United
Nations organizations to provide assistance to the Territory, if requested;

5. Calls upon the administering Power to assist the territorial Government
in strengthening its commitments in the economic domain, including fiscal matters;

 Bermuda

The General Assembly adopted the following resolution on Bermuda:

Taking note of the working paper prepared by the Secretariat on Bermuda10
and other relevant information,

Recalling the statement of the representative of Bermuda at the Caribbean
regional seminar, held in Frigate Bay, Saint Kitts and Nevis, from 12 to 14 May
2009,

Conscious of the different viewpoints of the political parties on the future
status of the Territory, and noting a recent survey by local media on the matter,
Recalling the dispatch of the United Nations special mission to Bermuda in
2005, at the request of the territorial Government and with the concurrence of the
administering Power, which provided information to the people of the Territory on
the role of the United Nations in the process of self-determination, on the legitimate
political status options as clearly defined in General Assembly resolution 1541 (XV)
and on the experiences of other small States that have achieved a full measure of
self-government,

1. Stresses the importance of the 2005 report of the Bermuda Independence
Commission, which provides a thorough examination of the facts surrounding
independence, and continues to regret that the plans for public meetings and the
presentation of a Green Paper to the House of Assembly followed by a White Paper
outlining the policy proposals for an independent Bermuda have so far not
materialized;

2. Requests the administering Power to assist the Territory by facilitating its
work concerning public educational outreach efforts, consistent with Article 73 b of
the Charter of the United Nations, and, in this regard, calls upon the relevant United
Nations organizations to provide assistance to the Territory, if requested;

British Virgin Islands

The General Assembly adopted the following resolution on the British Virgin Islands:

 Taking note of the working paper prepared by the Secretariat on the British
Virgin Islands and other relevant information,

Recalling the statement of the representative of the British Virgin Islands at the
Caribbean regional seminar, held in Frigate Bay, Saint Kitts and Nevis, from 12 to
14 May 2009,

Recalling also the 1993 report of the Constitutional Commissioners, the 1996
debate on the report in the Legislative Council of the Territory, the establishment of
the Constitutional Review Commission in 2004, the completion in 2005 of its report
providing recommendations on internal constitutional modernization and the debate
held in 2005 on the report in the Legislative Council, as well as the negotiations
between the administering Power and the territorial Government, which resulted in
the adoption of the new Constitution of the Territory in 2007,

Noting the view expressed in the aforementioned statement made by the
representative of the British Virgin Islands at the 2009 Caribbean regional seminar,
that, building on the conclusion of the recent internal constitutional modernization
exercise, the Territory’s focus was on economic development prior to any search for
independence,

Noting also the impact of the global economic slowdown on the Territory’s
financial and tourism services sectors,

Cognizant of the potential usefulness of regional ties for the development of a
small island Territory,

1. Recalls the new Constitution of the British Virgin Islands, which took
effect in June 2007, and stresses the importance of continued discussions on
constitutional matters;

2. Requests the administering Power to assist the Territory by facilitating its
work concerning public outreach efforts, consistent with Article 73 b of the Charter
of the United Nations, and, in that regard, calls upon the relevant United Nations
organizations to provide assistance to the Territory, if requested;

3. Welcomes the efforts made by the Territory to stimulate, including
through small business development, the two major segments of its economic base,
namely financial services and tourism;

Cayman Islands

The General Assembly adopted the following resolution on the Cayman Islands:

Taking note of the working paper prepared by the Secretariat on the Cayman
Islands and other relevant information,

Noting the statement made by the representative of the territorial Government
at the Pacific regional seminar held in Nouméa from 18 to 20 May 2010, which,
inter alia, indicated that, as affirmed during the general elections in May 2009, the
territorial Government had no mandate from the Territory’s people to pursue full
political independence,

Aware of the 2002 report of the Constitutional Modernization Review
Commission, which contained a draft constitution for the consideration of the
people of the Territory, the 2003 draft constitution offered by the administering
Power and the subsequent discussions between the Territory and the administering
Power in 2003, and the reopening of discussions between the administering Power
and the territorial Government on internal constitutional modernization, in 2006,
which resulted in the finalization of a new draft constitution in February 2009, its
subsequent acceptance by referendum in May 2009, and promulgation in November
2009,

Noting with interest the establishment, under the new Constitution, of a
Constitutional Commission, which serves as an advisory body on constitutional
matters,

Noting the participation of the Territory as an associate member of the
Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean,

Acknowledging the indication by the territorial Government that certain
economic growth and cost-of-living issues, such as inflation, continue to be cause
for concern,

1. Welcomes the promulgation of a new Constitution in November 2009,
and the appointment of Commissioners of the new Constitutional Commission by
the Governor, in consultation with the Premier and the Leader of the Opposition;

2. Requests the administering Power to assist the Territory by facilitating its
work concerning public awareness outreach efforts, consistent with Article 73 b of
the Charter of the United Nations, and, in this regard, calls upon the relevant United
Nations organizations to provide assistance to the Territory, if requested;

3. Welcomes the efforts made by the territorial Government to address
sectoral management policies and cost-of-living issues in various economic sectors;

 Guam

The General Assembly adopted the following resolution on Guam:

 Taking note of the working paper prepared by the Secretariat on Guam and
other relevant information,

Aware that under United States law the relations between the territorial
Government and the federal Government in all matters that are not the programme
responsibility of another federal department or agency are under the general
administrative supervision of the Secretary of the Interior,

Recalling that, in a referendum held in 1987, the registered and eligible voters
of Guam endorsed a draft Guam Commonwealth Act that would establish a new
framework for relations between the Territory and the administering Power,
providing for a greater measure of internal self-government for Guam and
recognition of the right of the Chamorro people of Guam to self-determination for
the Territory,

Recalling also the previously expressed requests by the elected representatives
and non-governmental organizations of the Territory that Guam not be removed
from the list of the Non-Self-Governing Territories with which the Special
Committee is concerned, pending the self-determination of the Chamorro people
and taking into account their legitimate rights and interests,

Aware that negotiations between the administering Power and the territorial
Government on the draft Guam Commonwealth Act ended in 1997 and that Guam
has subsequently established a non-binding plebiscite process for a
self-determination vote by the eligible Chamorro voters,

Cognizant of the importance that the administering Power continues to
implement its programme of transferring surplus federal land to the Government of
Guam,

Noting that the people of the Territory have called for reform in the
programme of the administering Power with respect to the thorough, unconditional
and expeditious transfer of land property to the people of Guam,
Aware of the deep concerns expressed by civil society and others, including at
the meeting of the Special Political and Decolonization Committee of the General
Assembly in October 2009 and at the Pacific regional seminar held in Nouméa from
18 to 20 May 2010, regarding the potential social, cultural, economic and
environmental impacts of the impending transfer of additional military personnel of
the administering Power to the Territory,

Conscious that immigration into Guam has resulted in the indigenous
Chamorros becoming a minority in their homeland,

1. Calls once again upon the administering Power to take into consideration
the expressed will of the Chamorro people as supported by Guam voters in the
referendum of 1987 and as subsequently provided for in Guam law regarding
Chamorro self-determination efforts, encourages the administering Power and the
territorial Government to enter into negotiations on the matter, and stresses the need
for continued close monitoring of the overall situation in the Territory;

2. Requests the administering Power, in cooperation with the territorial
Government, to continue to transfer land to the original landowners of the Territory,
to continue to recognize and to respect the political rights and the cultural and ethnic
identity of the Chamorro people of Guam and to take all measures necessary to
address the concerns of the territorial Government with regard to the question of
immigration;

3. Also requests the administering Power to assist the Territory by
facilitating public outreach efforts, consistent with Article 73 b of the Charter of the
United Nations, and, in this regard, calls upon the relevant United Nations
organizations to provide assistance to the Territory, if requested;

4. Further requests the administering Power to cooperate in establishing
programmes for the sustainable development of the economic activities and
enterprises of the Territory, noting the special role of the Chamorro people in the
development of Guam;

Montserrat

The General Assembly adopted the following resolution on Montserrat:

 Taking note of the working paper prepared by the Secretariat on Montserrat15
and other relevant information,

Recalling the statement of the representative of Montserrat at the Caribbean
regional seminar, held in Frigate Bay, Saint Kitts and Nevis, from 12 to 14 May
2009,

Recalling also the 2002 report of the Constitutional Review Commission, the
convening of a committee of the House of Assembly in 2005 to review the report
and the subsequent discussions between the administering Power and the territorial
Government on internal constitutional advancement and devolution of power,

Recalling further that the negotiating process with the administering Power on
a draft constitution giving greater autonomy to the territorial Government is
ongoing, and that, since March 2009, the administering Power has accorded stronger
emphasis to the redevelopment of the Territory,

Noting that, in May 2010, the newly elected territorial Government continued
the process of negotiating constitutional reforms with the administering Power and a
draft constitution agreed between the two parties was published for public
consultation,

Aware that Montserrat continues to receive budgetary aid from the
administering Power for the operation of the territorial Government,
Recalling the statements made by participants at the 2009 Caribbean regional
seminar encouraging the administering Power to commit sufficient resources to
meet the Territory’s special needs,

Noting with concern the continued consequences of the 1995 volcanic
eruption, which led to the evacuation of three quarters of the Territory’s population
to safe areas of the island and to areas outside the Territory, which continues to have
enduring consequences for the economy of the island,

Acknowledging the continued assistance provided to the Territory by States
members of the Caribbean Community, in particular Antigua and Barbuda, which
has offered safe refuge and access to educational and health facilities, as well as
employment for thousands who have left the Territory,

Noting the continuing efforts of the administering Power and the territorial
Government to deal with the consequences of the volcanic eruption,

1. Welcomes the progress made by the territorial Government and the
administering Power on concluding the negotiations to reform the Constitution of
the Territory and welcomes the public consultation being undertaken;

2. Requests the administering Power to assist the Territory by facilitating its
work concerning public outreach efforts, consistent with Article 73 b of the Charter
of the United Nations, and, in this regard, calls upon the relevant United Nations
organizations to provide assistance to the Territory, if requested;

3. Calls upon the administering Power, the specialized agencies and other
organizations of the United Nations system, as well as regional and other
organizations, to continue to provide assistance to the Territory in alleviating the
consequences of the volcanic eruption;

 New Caledonia

At the 6th meeting, on 8 October, the representative of the Syrian Arab
Republic, in his capacity as Rapporteur of the Special Committee on (Decolonisation), orally revised the draft resolution adopted by the Special Committee entitled “Question of New Caledonia”,

(a) Operative paragraph 3, which read:

“3. Notes the relevant provisions of the Nouméa Accord aimed at
taking more broadly into account the Kanak identity in the political and social
organization of New Caledonia, and welcomes, in this context, the adoption on
26 June 2008 by the Government of New Caledonia of a draft country law (loi
du pays) on the identity symbols to be adopted by the country in
implementation of the Nouméa Accord and the acceptance, on 21 October
2008, of the draft law on the anthem, motto and banknote design”,

was replaced by:

“3. Notes the relevant provisions of the Nouméa Accord aimed at
taking more broadly into account the Kanak identity in the political and social
organization of New Caledonia, and welcomes, in this context, the adoption on
18 August 2010 by the Government of New Caledonia of the law on the
anthem, motto and banknote designs”;

(b) Operative paragraph 21, which read:

“21. Recalls with satisfaction, in this regard, the participation of New
Caledonia at the 40th summit of the Pacific Islands Forum, held in Cairns,
Australia, on 5 and 6 August 2009, following its accession to the Forum as an
associate member in October 2006”,

was replaced by:

“21. Recalls with satisfaction, in this regard, the participation of New
Caledonia at the 41st summit of the Pacific Islands Forum, held in Port Vila on
4 and 5 August 2010, following its accession to the Forum as an associate
member in October 2006”.

The amended text of the resolution was adopted by the General Assembly as follows:

 Having considered the question of New Caledonia,

Having examined the chapter of the report of the Special Committee on the
Situation with regard to the Implementation of the Declaration on the Granting of
Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples for 2010 relating to New
Caledonia,

Reaffirming the right of peoples to self-determination as enshrined in the
Charter of the United Nations,

Recalling General Assembly resolutions 1514 (XV) of 14 December 1960 and
1541 (XV) of 15 December 1960,

Noting the importance of the positive measures being pursued in New
Caledonia by the French authorities, in cooperation with all sectors of the
population, to promote political, economic and social development in the Territory,
including measures in the area of environmental protection and action with respect
to drug abuse and trafficking, in order to provide a framework for its peaceful
progress to self-determination,

Noting also, in this context, the importance of equitable economic and social
development, as well as continued dialogue among the parties involved in New
Caledonia in the preparation of the act of self-determination of New Caledonia,
Noting with satisfaction the intensification of contacts between New Caledonia
and neighbouring countries of the South Pacific region,

1. Welcomes the significant developments that have taken place in New
Caledonia since the signing of the Nouméa Accord on 5 May 1998 by the
representatives of New Caledonia and the Government of France;2

2. Urges all the parties involved, in the interest of all the people of New
Caledonia, to maintain, in the framework of the Nouméa Accord, their dialogue in a
spirit of harmony, and in this context welcomes the unanimous agreement, reached
in Paris on 8 December 2008, on the transfer of powers to New Caledonia in 2009
and the conduct of provincial elections in May 2009;

3. Notes the relevant provisions of the Nouméa Accord aimed at taking
more broadly into account the Kanak identity in the political and social organization
of New Caledonia, and welcomes, in this context, the adoption on 18 August 2010
by the Government of New Caledonia of the law on the anthem, the motto and
banknote designs;

4. Acknowledges those provisions of the Nouméa Accord relating to control
of immigration and protection of local employment, and notes that unemployment
remains high among Kanaks and that recruitment of foreign mine workers
continues;

5. Notes the concerns expressed by a group of indigenous people in New
Caledonia regarding their underrepresentation in the Territory’s governmental and
social structures;

6. Also notes the concerns expressed by representatives of indigenous
people regarding incessant migratory flows and the impact of mining on the
environment;

7. Takes note of the relevant provisions of the Nouméa Accord to the effect
that New Caledonia may become a member or associate member of certain
international organizations, such as international organizations in the Pacific region,
the United Nations, the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural
Organization and the International Labour Organization, according to their
regulations;

8. Notes the agreement between the signatories to the Nouméa Accord that
the progress made in the emancipation process shall be brought to the attention of
the United Nations;

9. Recalls the fact that the administering Power invited to New Caledonia,
at the time the new institutions were established, a mission of information which
comprised representatives of countries of the Pacific region;

10. Notes the continuing strengthening of ties between New Caledonia and
both the European Union and the European Development Fund in such areas as
economic and trade cooperation, the environment, climate change and financial
services;

11. Calls upon the administering Power to continue to transmit to the
Secretary-General information as required under Article 73 e of the Charter of the
United Nations;

12. Invites all the parties involved to continue promoting a framework for the
peaceful progress of the Territory towards an act of self-determination in which all
options are open and which would safeguard the rights of all sectors of the
population, according to the letter and the spirit of the Nouméa Accord, which is
based on the principle that it is for the populations of New Caledonia to choose how
to control their destiny;

13. Recalls with satisfaction the efforts of the French authorities to resolve
the question of voter registration by adopting, in the French Congress of Parliament,
on 19 February 2007, amendments to the French Constitution allowing New
Caledonia to restrict eligibility to vote in local polls to those voters registered on the
1998 electoral rolls when the Nouméa Accord was signed, thus ensuring strong
representation of the Kanak population;

14. Welcomes all measures taken to strengthen and diversify the New
Caledonian economy in all fields, and encourages further such measures in
accordance with the spirit of the Matignon and Nouméa Accords;

15. Also welcomes the importance attached by the parties to the Matignon
and Nouméa Accords to greater progress in housing, employment, training,
education and health care in New Caledonia;

16. Notes the financial assistance rendered by the Government of France to
the Territory in areas such as health, education, payment of public-service salaries
and funding development schemes;

17. Acknowledges the contribution of the Melanesian Cultural Centre to the
protection of the indigenous Kanak culture of New Caledonia;

18. Notes the positive initiatives aimed at protecting the natural environment
of New Caledonia, including the “Zonéco” operation designed to map and evaluate
marine resources within the economic zone of New Caledonia;

19. Welcomes the cooperation among Australia, France and New Zealand in
terms of surveillance of fishing zones, in accordance with the wishes expressed by
France during the France-Oceania Summits in July 2003 and June 2006;

20. Acknowledges the close links between New Caledonia and the peoples of
the South Pacific and the positive actions being taken by the French and territorial
authorities to facilitate the further development of those links, including the
development of closer relations with the countries members of the Pacific Islands
Forum;

21. Recalls with satisfaction, in this regard, the participation of New
Caledonia at the 41st summit of the Pacific Islands Forum, held in Port Vila on
4 and 5 August 2010, following its accession to the Forum as an associate member
in October 2006;

22. Recalls the continuing high-level visits to New Caledonia by delegations
from countries of the Pacific region and high-level visits by delegations from New
Caledonia to countries members of the Pacific Islands Forum;

23. Welcomes the cooperative attitude of other States and Territories in the
region towards New Caledonia, its economic and political aspirations and its
increasing participation in regional and international affairs;
24. Recalls the endorsement of the report of the Forum Ministerial
Committee on New Caledonia by leaders of the Pacific Islands Forum at its 36th
Summit, held in Papua New Guinea in October 2005, and the continuing role of the
Forum Ministerial Committee in monitoring developments in the Territory and
encouraging closer regional engagements;

25. Welcomes the successful conclusion of the Pacific regional seminar of the
Special Committee on the Situation with regard to the Implementation of the
Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples,
held in Nouméa from 18 to 20 May 2010, and expresses its appreciation to the
people and Government of New Caledonia for hosting the seminar and to the
Government of France for its support in organizing it;

26. Decides to keep under continuous review the process unfolding in New
Caledonia as a result of the signing of the Nouméa Accord;

27. Requests the Special Committee to continue the examination of the
question of the Non-Self-Governing Territory of New Caledonia and to report
thereon to the General Assembly at its sixty-sixth session.

Pitcairn

The General Assembly adopted the following resolution on Pitcairn:

Taking note of the working paper prepared by the Secretariat on Pitcairn16 and
other relevant information,

Taking into account the unique character of Pitcairn in terms of population,
area and access,

Noting that, following consultations in 2009, the Pitcairn Constitution Order
2010, including human rights provisions, came into force in the Territory in March
2010, replacing the 1970 Pitcairn Order and 1970 Royal Instructions,

Aware that the administering Power and the territorial Government have
implemented a new governance structure to strengthen administrative capacity in
the Territory, based on consultations with the people of the Territory, and that
Pitcairn continues to receive budgetary aid from the administering Power for the
operation of the territorial Government,

1. Welcomes the entry into force of the Pitcairn Constitution Order 2010 in
the Territory in March 2010, featuring a new constitutional framework and human
rights provisions, and all efforts by the administering Power and the territorial
Government that would further devolve operational responsibilities to the Territory,
with a view to gradually expanding self-government, including through training of
local personnel;

2. Requests the administering Power to assist the Territory by facilitating its
work concerning public outreach efforts, consistent with Article 73 b of the Charter
of the United Nations, and, in this regard, calls upon the relevant United Nations
organizations to provide assistance to the Territory, if requested;

3. Also requests the administering Power to continue its assistance for the
improvement of the economic, social, educational and other conditions of the
population of the Territory and to continue its discussions with the territorial
Government on how best to support economic security in Pitcairn;


Saint Helena

The United Nations Fourth Committee made the following changes to the recommended resolution of the Decolonisation Committee:

(c) The eighth preambular paragraph, which read:

“Noting also the importance of improving the infrastructure and
accessibility of Saint Helena, and, in this regard, the administering Power’s
decision in December 2009 not to proceed with an airport project for the time
being, and to conduct further analysis, including options for funding the
capital cost of the airport through a public-private partnership”,

was replaced by:

“Noting also the importance of improving the infrastructure and
accessibility of Saint Helena, and, in this regard, the administering Power’s
announcement on 22 July 2010 about plans for building an airport on the
island of Saint Helena”;

(d) Operative paragraph 4, which read:

“4. Notes the decision by the administering Power to carry out further
analysis on building an airport in the Territory, and calls upon the
administering Power to take into account the unique geographical character of
Saint Helena in the process”,

was replaced by:

“4. Calls upon the administering Power to take into account the unique
geographical character of Saint Helena while resolving as soon as feasible any
outstanding issues related to the airport construction”;


The amended text of the resolution was adopted by the General Assembly as follows:

 Taking note of the working paper prepared by the Secretariat on Saint
Helena and other relevant information,

Recalling the statement of the representative of Saint Helena at the Caribbean
regional seminar, held in Frigate Bay, Saint Kitts and Nevis, from 12 to 14 May
2009,

Taking into account the unique character of Saint Helena in terms of its
population, geography and natural resources,
Noting the internal constitutional review process led by the territorial
Government since 2001, the completion of a draft constitution following
negotiations between the administering Power and the territorial Government in
2003 and 2004, the consultative poll with regard to a new Constitution, held in Saint
Helena in May 2005, the subsequent preparation of a revised draft constitution and
its publication in June 2008 for further public consultation, and the entry into force
of the new Constitution for Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha on
1 September 2009,

Aware that Saint Helena continues to receive budgetary aid from the
administering Power for the operation of the territorial Government,
Aware also of the efforts of the administering Power and the territorial
Government to improve the socio-economic conditions of the population of Saint
Helena, in particular in the areas of employment and transport and communications
infrastructure,

Noting the efforts of the Territory to address the problem of unemployment on
the island and the joint action of the administering Power and the territorial
Government in dealing with it,

Noting also the importance of improving the infrastructure and accessibility of
Saint Helena, and, in this regard, the administering Power’s announcement on
22 July 2010 about plans for building an airport on the island of Saint Helena,

1. Stresses the importance of the entry into force of the Territory’s new
Constitution in 2009;

2. Requests the administering Power to assist the Territory by facilitating its
work concerning public outreach efforts, consistent with Article 73 b of the Charter
of the United Nations, and, in that regard, calls upon the relevant United Nations
organizations to provide assistance to the Territory, if requested;

3. Requests the administering Power and relevant international
organizations to continue to support the efforts of the territorial Government to
address the Territory’s socio-economic development challenges, including
unemployment, and limited transport and communications infrastructure;

4. Calls upon the administering Power to take into account the unique
geographical character of Saint Helena while resolving as soon as feasible any
outstanding issues related to the airport construction;

 Tokelau

The General Assembly adopted the following resolution on Tokelau:


The General Assembly,

Having considered the question of Tokelau,

Having examined the chapter of the report of the Special Committee on the
Situation with regard to the Implementation of the Declaration on the Granting of
Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples for 2010 relating to Tokelau,

Recalling its resolution 1514 (XV) of 14 December 1960, containing the
Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples, and
all resolutions and decisions of the United Nations relating to Non-Self-Governing
Territories, in particular General Assembly resolution 64/103 of 10 December 2009,

Noting with appreciation the continuing exemplary cooperation of New
Zealand as the administering Power with regard to the work of the Special
Committee relating to Tokelau and its readiness to permit access by United Nations
visiting missions to the Territory,

Noting also with appreciation the collaborative contribution to the
development of Tokelau by New Zealand and the specialized agencies and other
organizations of the United Nations system, in particular the United Nations
Development Programme,

Noting that, as a small island Territory, Tokelau exemplifies the situation of
most remaining Non-Self-Governing Territories and that, as a case study pointing to
successful cooperation for decolonization, Tokelau has wider significance for the
United Nations as it seeks to complete its work in decolonization,

Recalling that New Zealand and Tokelau signed in November 2003 a
document entitled “Joint statement of the principles of partnership”, which sets out
the rights and responsibilities of the two partners,

Bearing in mind the decision of the General Fono at its meeting in November
2003, following extensive consultations undertaken in all three villages, to explore
formally with New Zealand the option of self-government in free association and its
decision in August 2005 to hold in February 2006 a referendum on selfdetermination
on the basis of a draft constitution for Tokelau and a draft treaty of
free association with New Zealand, and its subsequent decision to hold a further
referendum in October 2007,

1. Notes that Tokelau and New Zealand remain firmly committed to the
ongoing development of Tokelau for the long-term benefit of the people of Tokelau,
with particular emphasis on the further development of facilities on each atoll that
meet their current requirements;

2. Welcomes the progress made towards the devolution of power to the three
taupulega (village councils), in particular the delegation of the Administrator’s
powers to the three taupulega with effect from 1 July 2004 and the assumption by
each taupulega from that date of full responsibility for the management of all its
public services;

3. Recalls the decision of the General Fono in November 2003, following
extensive consultations in all three villages and a meeting of the Special Committee
on the Constitution of Tokelau, to explore formally with New Zealand the option of
self-government in free association, and the discussions subsequently held between
Tokelau and New Zealand pursuant to the decision of the General Fono;

4. Also recalls the decision of the General Fono in August 2005 to hold a
referendum on self-government on the basis of a draft constitution for Tokelau and a
draft treaty of free association with New Zealand, and notes the enactment by the
General Fono of rules for the referendum;

5. Further recalls that two referendums to determine the status of Tokelau,
held in February 2006 and October 2007, did not produce the two-thirds majority of
the valid votes cast required by the General Fono to change Tokelau’s status from
that of a Non-Self-Governing Territory under the administration of New Zealand;

6. Commends the professional and transparent conduct of both the February
2006 and the October 2007 referendums, monitored by the United Nations;

7. Acknowledges the decision of the General Fono that consideration of any
future act of self-determination by Tokelau will be deferred and that New Zealand
and Tokelau will devote renewed effort and attention to ensuring that essential
services and infrastructure on the atolls of Tokelau are enhanced and strengthened,
thereby ensuring an enhanced quality of life for the people of Tokelau;

8. Also acknowledges Tokelau’s adoption of its National Strategic Plan for
2010-2015;

9. Further acknowledges the ongoing and consistent commitment of New
Zealand to meeting the social and economic requirements of the people of Tokelau,
as well as the support and cooperation of the United Nations Development
Programme;

10. Acknowledges Tokelau’s need for continued support from the
international community;

11. Recalls with satisfaction the establishment and operation of the Tokelau
International Trust Fund to support the ongoing needs of Tokelau, and calls upon
Member States and international and regional agencies to contribute to the Fund and
thereby lend practical support to Tokelau in overcoming the problems of smallness,
isolation and lack of resources;

12. Welcomes the cooperative attitude of the other States and territories in the
region towards Tokelau, and their support for its economic and political aspirations
and its increasing participation in regional and international affairs;

13. Calls upon the administering Power and United Nations agencies to
continue to provide assistance to Tokelau as it further develops;

14. Welcomes the actions taken by the administering Power to transmit
information regarding the political, economic and social situation of Tokelau to the
Secretary-General;

15. Also welcomes the commitment of both Tokelau and New Zealand to
continue to work together in the interests of Tokelau and its people;

16. Requests the Special Committee on the Situation with regard to the
Implementation of the Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial
Countries and Peoples to continue to examine the question of the Non-Self-
Governing Territory of Tokelau and to report thereon to the General Assembly at its
sixty-sixth session.

Turks and Caicos Islands

The United Nations Fourth Committee made the following changes to the recommended resolution of the Decolonisation Committee:

(e) The seventh preambular paragraph, which read:

“Noting with concern the suspension of the elected territorial Government of
the Territory”,

was replaced by:

“Noting the postponement of elections in the Territory”;

(f) The position of operative paragraphs 1 and 2 was reversed;

(g) At the end of operative paragraph 3 the following words were inserted:

 “and notes also the view expressed by the administering Power not to postpone elections any longer than necessary”

(h) Operative paragraph 4, which read:

“4. Stresses the importance of putting in place for the Territory a
Constitution that reflects the aspirations and wishes of the people of the Territory,
based on the work of the Constitutional Commission, the Turks and Caicos forum
and other mechanisms for popular consultation”,

was replaced by:

“4. Also notes the extensive public consultations undertaken by the
Constitutional and Electoral Reform Adviser and the continued debate on
constitutional and electoral reform within the Territory, and stresses the
importance of participation by all groups and interested parties in the
consultation process”;

 (i) A new operative paragraph 5 was inserted, reading:

“5. Stresses further the importance of having in place in the Territory a
Constitution that reflects the aspirations and wishes of the people of the
Territory, based on the mechanisms for popular consultation”;

(j) Existing operative paragraphs 5 and 6 were renumbered as operative
Paragraphs  6 and 7.

 The amended text of the resolution was adopted by the General Assembly as follows:

Taking note of the working paper prepared by the Secretariat on the Turks and
Caicos Islands and other relevant information,

Recalling the statement of the representative of the Turks and Caicos Islands at
the Caribbean regional seminar, held in Frigate Bay, Saint Kitts and Nevis, from
12 to 14 May 2009,

Recalling also the dispatch of the United Nations special mission to the Turks
and Caicos Islands in 2006, at the request of the territorial Government and with the
concurrence of the administering Power,
Recalling further the 2002 report of the Constitutional Modernization Review
Body, and acknowledging the Constitution agreed between the administering Power
and the territorial Government, which entered into force in 2006,

Noting the administering Power’s decision to suspend parts of the 2006
Constitution of the Turks and Caicos Islands, covering the constitutional right to
trial by jury, ministerial Government, and the House of Assembly, following the
recommendations of an independent Commission of Inquiry and the ruling of the
administering Power’s Court of Appeal,

Acknowledging the impact that the global economic slowdown and other
relevant developments have had on tourism and related real estate development, the
mainstays of the Territory’s economy,

Noting the postponement of elections in the Territory,

1. Notes with concern the ongoing situation in the Turks and Caicos Islands,
and also notes the efforts of the administering Power to restore good governance and
sound financial management in the Territory;

2. Calls for the restoration of constitutional arrangements providing for
representative democracy through elected territorial Government as soon as
possible;

3. Notes the positions and repeated calls of the Caribbean Community and
the Movement of Non-Aligned Countries for the restoration of democratically
elected territorial Government as a matter of urgency and notes also the view
expressed by the administering Power not to postpone elections any longer than
necessary;

4. Also notes the extensive public consultations undertaken by the
Constitutional and Electoral Reform Adviser and the continued debate on
constitutional and electoral reform within the Territory, and stresses the importance
of participation by all groups and interested parties in the consultation process;

5. Stresses further the importance of having in place in the Territory a
Constitution that reflects the aspirations and wishes of the people of the Territory,
based on the mechanisms for popular consultation;

6. Requests the administering Power to assist the Territory by facilitating its
work concerning public outreach efforts, consistent with Article 73 b of the Charter
of the United Nations, and, in that regard, calls upon the relevant United Nations
organizations to provide assistance to the Territory, if requested;

7. Welcomes the continuing efforts made by the Government addressing the
need for attention to be paid to the enhancement of socio-economic development
across the Territory;

United States Virgin Islands

The text of the resolution was adopted by the General Assembly as follows:

 Taking note of the working paper prepared by the Secretariat on the United
States Virgin Islands and other relevant information,

Aware that under United States law the relations between the territorial
Government and the federal Government in all matters not the programme
responsibility of another federal department or agency are under the general
administrative supervision of the Secretary of the Interior

Aware also of the fifth attempt of the Territory to review the existing Revised
Organic Act, which organizes its internal governance arrangements, as well as its
requests to the administering Power and the United Nations system for assistance to
its public education programme,

Cognizant that a draft constitution was proposed in 2009 and subsequently
forwarded to the administering Power for review and action,
Cognizant also of the potential usefulness of regional ties for the development
of a small island Territory,

1. Welcomes the proposal of a draft constitution emanating from the
Territory in 2009, as a result of the work of the United States Virgin Islands fifth
Constitutional Convention, for review by the administering Power, and requests the
administering Power to assist the territorial Government in achieving its political,
economic and social goals, in particular the successful conclusion of the ongoing
internal Constitutional Convention exercise;

2. Requests the administering Power to facilitate the process for approval of
the proposed territorial constitution in the United States Congress and its
implementation, once agreed upon in the Territory;

3. Also requests the administering Power to assist the Territory by
facilitating its work concerning a public education programme, consistent with
Article 73 b of the Charter of the United Nations, and, in this regard, calls upon the
relevant United Nations organizations to provide assistance to the Territory, if
requested;

4. Reiterates its call for the inclusion of the Territory in regional
programmes of the United Nations Development Programme, consistent with the
participation of other Non-Self-Governing Territories.