Compañeros Unidos para la Descolonización de Puerto Rico: CitaPatriótica ONU Junio 2012 |
A forum for critical analysis of international issues and developments of particular relevance to the sustainable political and socio-economic development of Overseas Countries and Territories (OCTs).
16 October 2015
Imperios no mantienen colonias, las explotan / Empires don’t support colonies, they exploit them
Dutch 'partial integration' of Bonaire, Saba, Statia a failed experiment?
THE
HAGUE--The public entity status of Bonaire, St. Eustatius and Saba has brought
much disappointment, and the balance after five years is not favourable,
concluded the Caribbean Netherlands Evaluation Committee in its report that was
presented in The Hague on Monday.
A widely felt disappointment predominates on the three islands.
This disappointment has consistently increased since October 2010, when the
islands became part of the Netherlands and the Netherlands Antilles ceased to
exist as a country.
The high expectations which people and the governments on the
islands had at the start of the transition have largely not been met. This is
largely attributable to the level of prosperity: since 2010 the standard of
living has fallen for many people, including those with a job. This
disappointment has overshadowed the positive developments in for example health
care and education where plans were more ambitious and agreements more
concrete.
People on the islands feel that they have not been involved in the
changes enough, and that insufficient account has often been taken of the
islands’ special circumstances. The problem of poverty has increased, partly due
to the declining purchasing power and the low level of social provisions.
“The concerns about the daily existence have contributed to
people’s negative experience of the transition,” stated Committee Chairperson
Liesbeth Spies during the presentation which was attended by representatives of
the governments of the three islands and the Dutch Government.
The committee concluded that disappointing results were caused by
a number of factors. The agreements that have been made were not always clear,
not to the people and neither to the government.
The differences in language, scale and culture added to a complex
collaboration between Bonaire, St. Eustatius, Saba and the Dutch Government.
“People find it hard to understand each other. Interests are also highly divergent.
For the islands, the relationship with the Netherlands is of vital importance
while this is certainly not the case for the Netherlands. In Dutch politics,
the relationship with the islands is only of minor importance.”
Agreements were also interpreted differently: the islands had
different expectations than the Netherlands. The most striking example was the
agreement at the time of the transition to reach a standard of services and
provisions that was acceptable within the Netherlands.
The standard wasn’t introduced for many services, especially in
the social area, while the standard of living kept deteriorating, the committee
found. The “voorzieningenniveau” is still a source of discussion with the
islands striving for the same level as in the Netherlands, and the Netherlands
having a different opinion on what is acceptable.
The approach of the Dutch Government has been fragmented, and
knowledge of the specific circumstances on Bonaire, St. Eustatius and Saba has
been often limited. “There is no overall approach to speak of despite the fact
that the nature of the problems and scale of islands call for such an
approach.”
The fragmentation is difficult to handle for the islands because
of their limited staffing capabilities. “It takes a lot of meeting and
consulting which means that a disproportionate administration load falls to the
islands.”
An integral approach is further hampered by the fact that the
Minister of Home Affairs and Kingdom Relations, based on a deliberate choice
made at the time, does not have the authority which would allow him to control
the Dutch policy, let alone enforce policy changes based on an integral vision.
As a result, the position of the National Government Representative is such
that he is not in the position to make a difference when required.
Relations have become more strained, particularly the Netherlands
and St. Eustatius, and to a lesser extent Bonaire.
“Government representatives have diametrically opposing views and
the debate mainly centres on the division of tasks and authorities. Discussions
focus on autonomy, independence and a neo-colonial attitude. The people of the
islands do not benefit from this situation.”
In addition, the local administrations have not yet reached the
required level of quality. They remain vulnerable. “Given the small scale of
the islands and the limited capability available, it has been proven to be
difficult to ensure the long-term quality of administration. The situation is
too dependent on the efforts and quality of individuals which is why there are
big differences between the islands in the level of administration.”
The global economic and financial crisis was an outside
contributor which adversely affected the islands’ economic and social
development. According to the committee there were “strong indications” that
the transition and the implementation of certain laws didn’t have the intended
positive influence on the economic development, and by extension the level of
prosperity for the people. The Netherlands and the islands lack a shared
approach which offers prospects for future economic development.
“Unfortunately we have to conclude that so far the balance has not
been favourable,” stated Spies. “However, five years is a short period. And, as
the implementation of the transition is still in full progress, it is too early
for a final judgement.”
Spies said she hoped that the conclusions of the evaluation would
serve as an impulse to bring the original objectives of the constitutional
change closer over the coming years. “We hope that it will inspire to do things
better,” she said.
The committee concluded that there was still a lot of room for
improvement. “It is now up to the authorities that commissioned this
evaluation, the public entities and the Dutch Government, to jointly take up
this challenge, based on the results of this evaluation, and initiate the
changes deemed necessary and ensure they are implemented.”
Making the most of the islands’ public entity status requires the
governments involved to “jump over their own shadows” to create room for
self-development, to take responsibility and to invest, also in mutual trust.
“Each of the islands will have to come up with an answer to the
question what they can do themselves, where they should do better and where
they need help and support. A higher level of facilities and economic
development can be achieved together, in consultation with the people.”
The findings of the committee were largely based on the input of
the islands, its residents, private sector, social organisations and
government. Aside from the committee’s general conclusions, there were three
individual reports that served in the evaluation.
The Social and Cultural Plan Bureau of the Netherlands SCP
analysed the consequences of the new relations for the people. Pro Facto of the
University of Groningen looked at the effects of the legislation, while the DSP
Group of Dr. Oberon Nauta studied the workings of the new administrative
structure.
Elaborate information, including the four reports, as well as a
video for the general public, can be found on the committee’s website, www.evaluatiecn.nl. Much of the information, mainly the conclusions, is also available in English and Papiamentu.
The Evaluation Committee consists of Chairperson Spies, Fred
Soons, Glenn Thodé, Luc Verhey and Frans Weekers. The committee was assisted by
a secretariat and a supervisory committee of experts.
Labels:
Bonaire,
Caribbean,
dependency governance,
Dutch Antilles,
Netherlands,
Saba,
St. Eustatius
15 October 2015
Pending U.S. Measure Labels 19 Caribbean Territories as Tax Havens
List includes dependencies of Anguilla, British Virgin Islands, Cayman Islands, Turks and Caicos Islands and the U.S. Virgin Islands; as well as the autonomous countries of Aruba, Bonaire, Curacao, St. Maarten.

SAN JUAN – The Caribbean Association of Banks is expressing concern over the inclusion of 19 Caribbean islands and territories on a list of tax havens in the District of Columbia Fiscal Year 2016 Budget Support Act of 2015, which is awaiting approval by the U.S. Congress.
The D.C. legislation seeks to expand the definition of tax haven to the detriment of Caribbean territories that are making good faith efforts against tax evasion, the CAB said Wednesday in a statement.
“While the CAB fully supports the District of Columbia’s efforts to combat tax evasion, the CAB feels that the designation of Caribbean territories as ‘tax havens’ is prejudicial,” the Castries-based organization said.
Because the District of Columbia is federal territory, D.C. legislation must be approved by Congress.
In this case, the review process is expected to continue for several more weeks and CAB has sent letters to members of Congress urging them to remove several territories from the tax haven blacklist.
CAB said that 10 of the 15 Caribbean Community member-states on the list “are fully or largely compliant and have committed to Automatic Exchange of Information.”
Those 10 CARICOM members are: Antigua and Barbuda, Bahamas, Barbados, Belize, Dominica, Grenada, Montserrat, St. Lucia, St. Kitts and Nevis and St. Vincent and the Grenadines.
Non-CARICOM members included on the D.C. tax haven list are: Anguilla 1/, Aruba, Bonaire, Curacao, St. Maarten, British Virgin Islands 1/, Cayman Islands 1/, Turks and Caicos Islands 1; and the U.S. Virgin Islands.
________________________________________________
1/ These British dependencies are associate members of CARICOM (OTR).
The D.C. legislation seeks to expand the definition of tax haven to the detriment of Caribbean territories that are making good faith efforts against tax evasion, the CAB said Wednesday in a statement.
“While the CAB fully supports the District of Columbia’s efforts to combat tax evasion, the CAB feels that the designation of Caribbean territories as ‘tax havens’ is prejudicial,” the Castries-based organization said.
Because the District of Columbia is federal territory, D.C. legislation must be approved by Congress.
In this case, the review process is expected to continue for several more weeks and CAB has sent letters to members of Congress urging them to remove several territories from the tax haven blacklist.
CAB said that 10 of the 15 Caribbean Community member-states on the list “are fully or largely compliant and have committed to Automatic Exchange of Information.”
Those 10 CARICOM members are: Antigua and Barbuda, Bahamas, Barbados, Belize, Dominica, Grenada, Montserrat, St. Lucia, St. Kitts and Nevis and St. Vincent and the Grenadines.
Non-CARICOM members included on the D.C. tax haven list are: Anguilla 1/, Aruba, Bonaire, Curacao, St. Maarten, British Virgin Islands 1/, Cayman Islands 1/, Turks and Caicos Islands 1; and the U.S. Virgin Islands.
________________________________________________
1/ These British dependencies are associate members of CARICOM (OTR).
Labels:
Caribbean,
CARICOM,
financial sector,
US Virgin Islands
14 October 2015
Bonaire activist informs Netherlands of violation of the constitutional wishes of the people of Bonaire and St Eustatius
(Translation by OTR
original Dutch below)
The Lieutenant Governor of Public Body Bonaire Executive Council of Public Body Bonaire Island Council of the Public Body Bonaire Mr Ronald Plasterk, Minister of the Interior and Kingdom Relations
Members of the Standing Committee members of Standing Committee of the 1st and 2nd Chambers
Kralendijk, October 12, 2015
Dear Directors:
In connection with the evaluation of the new state structure, five years later, on October 10, 2015 and the official report released today October 12, 2015, we invite your attention to the following:
October 10, 2010 the country Netherlands Antilles was dissolved and the autonomous countries Curacao and St. Maarten emerged joining Aruba which already had autonomous status. As a result, the islands of Saba, St Eustatius and Bonaire, (known as the BES islands) were (partially) integrated into the Dutch state under Article 134.
In Bonaire and St Eustatius, various groups have continuously protested against this illegal annexation of both islands. St Eustatius is going so far have brought this matter recently to the Decolonization Committee of the United Nations and the reasons:
Netherlands has not complied with resolutions 1514, 1541 and 2625, and the Charter of the United Nations, since 1954 and the dismantling of the former Netherlands Antilles with the consequences that these islands were wrongly removed from the U.N. list of Non-Self-Governing- Territories.
Netherlands has not complied with resolutions 1514, 1541 and 2625, and the Charter of the United Nations, since 1954 and the dismantling of the former Netherlands Antilles with the consequences that these islands were wrongly removed from the U.N. list of Non-Self-Governing- Territories.
The Netherlands has not adhered to the constitutional wishes of the people of Bonaire and St Eustatius, and have thus made them miserable.
The Netherlands continues its position as a (former ?) colonizing power perpetuating abuse, violating fundamental human rights and interfering unduly with the local political process.
This brings the legality of the (five-year) assessment into question, and we do not accept the official document which placed the islands on the illegal trajectory of the dismantling of the Netherlands Antilles, and the illegal incorporation of the BES islands into the Dutch state. This process has no legal basis for the future development of the peoples of the BES islands. This structure of (partial) integration into the Dutch state under article 134 was never a free and conscious choice of our people.
Hoping to have sufficiently informed, I remain,
With kind regards,
James Finies
The Netherlands continues its position as a (former ?) colonizing power perpetuating abuse, violating fundamental human rights and interfering unduly with the local political process.
This brings the legality of the (five-year) assessment into question, and we do not accept the official document which placed the islands on the illegal trajectory of the dismantling of the Netherlands Antilles, and the illegal incorporation of the BES islands into the Dutch state. This process has no legal basis for the future development of the peoples of the BES islands. This structure of (partial) integration into the Dutch state under article 134 was never a free and conscious choice of our people.
Hoping to have sufficiently informed, I remain,
With kind regards,
James Finies
Kaya Mamore 3, Bonaire
(Original Dutch)
De Gezaghebber van Openbaar Lichaam Bonaire Bestuurscollege van Openbaar Lichaam Bonaire Eilandsraad van het Openbaar Lichaam Bonaire Mr Ronald Plasterk, Minister van Binnenlandse Zaken en Koninkrijksrelaties
Leden van de Vaste Commissie Leden van Vaste Commissie van de 1ste en 2de Kamer
Kralendijk, 12 oktober 2015
Geachte Bestuurders,
In verband met de evaluatie van de nieuwe staatstructuur, vijf jaar later op 10 oktober 2015 en welk raport vandaag 12 oktober 2015 oficieel is overhandigd aan de opdrachtgevers verzoeken wij Uw aandacht voor het volgende:
10 oktober 2010 is het land Nederlandse Antillen opgeheven en de outonome landen Aruba, Curacao en St Maarten als gevolg en de eilanden Saba, St Eustatius en Bonaire, bekend als de BES eilanden geintegreerd in het Nederlands staatsbestel onder artikel 134.
Op Bonaire en St Eustatius hebben diverse groeperingen continu geprotesteerd tegen deze illegale inlijving van beide eilanden. St Eustatius is zelfs zover dat ze kort geleden deze zaak hebben voorgelegd aan de Dekolonisatie Comite bij de Verenigde Naties en met redenen:
Nederland heeft niet voldaan aan de resoluties 1514, 1541 en 2625 van het Handvest van de Verenigde Naties sinds 1954 en bij de ontmanteling van de voormalige Nederlandse Antillen met de gevolgen dat deze eilanden ten onrechte verwijderd zijn van de lijst van Non-Self-Governing-Territories.
Nederland heeft geen juiste inhoud gegeven aan de constitutionele wensen van de bevolkingen van Bonaire en St Eustatius en hebben hun hierdoor diep ongelukkig gemaakt.
Nederland blijft haar positie als (voormalige) koloniserende macht misbruiken en schend fundamentele mensenrechten en bemoei op onrechtmatige wijze met de lokale politieke process.
Hierdoor is de legaliteit van de evaluatie te betwisten en accepteren wij niet als officiele document voor de ilegale traject van het ontmanteling van de Nederlandse Antillen en het ilegaal inlijven van de BES eilanden in het Nederlands staatsbestel en zal geen basis kunnen zijn voor het verder voortslepen op in of andere wijze van de ongelukkige volkeren van de BES eilanden en in ons geval specifiek Bonaire in deze struktuur, geintegreerd in het Nederlands staatsbestel onder artikel 134 dat nooit een vrij en bewuste keuze was van ons volk.
Hopende u voldoende te hebben geinformeerd, verblijf ik,
10 oktober 2010 is het land Nederlandse Antillen opgeheven en de outonome landen Aruba, Curacao en St Maarten als gevolg en de eilanden Saba, St Eustatius en Bonaire, bekend als de BES eilanden geintegreerd in het Nederlands staatsbestel onder artikel 134.
Op Bonaire en St Eustatius hebben diverse groeperingen continu geprotesteerd tegen deze illegale inlijving van beide eilanden. St Eustatius is zelfs zover dat ze kort geleden deze zaak hebben voorgelegd aan de Dekolonisatie Comite bij de Verenigde Naties en met redenen:
Nederland heeft niet voldaan aan de resoluties 1514, 1541 en 2625 van het Handvest van de Verenigde Naties sinds 1954 en bij de ontmanteling van de voormalige Nederlandse Antillen met de gevolgen dat deze eilanden ten onrechte verwijderd zijn van de lijst van Non-Self-Governing-Territories.
Nederland heeft geen juiste inhoud gegeven aan de constitutionele wensen van de bevolkingen van Bonaire en St Eustatius en hebben hun hierdoor diep ongelukkig gemaakt.
Nederland blijft haar positie als (voormalige) koloniserende macht misbruiken en schend fundamentele mensenrechten en bemoei op onrechtmatige wijze met de lokale politieke process.
Hierdoor is de legaliteit van de evaluatie te betwisten en accepteren wij niet als officiele document voor de ilegale traject van het ontmanteling van de Nederlandse Antillen en het ilegaal inlijven van de BES eilanden in het Nederlands staatsbestel en zal geen basis kunnen zijn voor het verder voortslepen op in of andere wijze van de ongelukkige volkeren van de BES eilanden en in ons geval specifiek Bonaire in deze struktuur, geintegreerd in het Nederlands staatsbestel onder artikel 134 dat nooit een vrij en bewuste keuze was van ons volk.
Hopende u voldoende te hebben geinformeerd, verblijf ik,
Met vriendelijk groet,
James Finies, Kaya Mamore 3, Bonaire
Labels:
Bonaire,
Colonialism,
dependency governance,
Dutch Antilles,
human rights violations,
Netherlands,
occupation
13 October 2015
French Colonialism in Polynesia under United Nations scrutiny
RNZI/PACNEWS
A French Polynesian delegate to the UN decolonisation discussions in New York says he hopes France won't boycott the upcoming meeting as it has done in the past.
Richard Tuheiava of the opposition pro-independence Tavini Huiraatira Party has noted that although France is a member of the UN Security Council, it routinely defies the UN decolonisation process by staying away from his delegation's presentation.
Two years ago, the UN General Assembly returned French Polynesia to the list of territories to be decolonised, which still includes 17 territories - 70 years after the UN set it up.
Tuheiava has told the local newspaper that he also wants to raise the issue of strategic resources - a reference to rare earths in the territory's seabed.
The meeting may also raise the aftermath of the nuclear weapons testing conducted by France.
The French Polynesian government is opposed to the decolonisation process.
Labels:
Asia,
France,
French Polynesia,
non self-governing territories,
nuclear testing,
Pacific,
radiation,
United Nations
12 October 2015
Tahiti Political Leader tells United Nations of French exploitation of territory's natural resources and diversion of its revenue
Statement to the United Nations Special Political
and Decolonization Committee (Fourth Committee)
Hon. Richard, Ariihau TUHEIAVA
Elected Member of the House of Assembly of French Polynesia
9th October 2015
Mr. Chairman, distinguished delegates,
On behalf of the Group “Union Pour La Démocratie” (U.P.L.D.), I
wish to express our appreciation to the Special Committee of
Decolonization for the adoption last June of recommendations on
French Polynesia presently before this Committee.
Mr. Chairman,
We maintain our consistent commitment to the role of the
U.N. in the decolonization of our territory pursuant to
international law.
We once again urge the administering power, France, to
comply with its obligations under Article 73(e) of the U.N. Charter
to transmit information, and under Article 73 (b) to develop
genuine self-government with political equality.
In this regards, it is regrettable that the administering power -
in particular, a member of the Council of Security - continues to
ignore its U.N. Charter obligations.
We solemnly recall the provision 3 of the UN resolution 1514
(XV): « (…) Inadequacy of political, economic, social or
educational preparedness should never serve as a pretext for
delaying independence.
Mr. Chairman,
From our perspective, decolonization is fundamentally about
justice. But justice delayed, is justice denied. The existent
political status quo, which finds the administering power
exercising control of the main governance functions, denies us
the fundamental right to an equitable and genuine self-determination
process, and is reflective of a false autonomy.
Mr. Chairman,
The General Assembly has adopted a host of resolutions
confirming that the ownership, control and permanent
sovereignty of natural resources, including marine resources,
lies with the peoples of the non self-governing territories as part of
their heritage.
U.N. resolutions have also affirmed that the exploitation and
plundering of these resources by foreign economic interests is in
violation of relevant U.N. resolutions, and is a threat to the
territories' integrity and prosperity.
Mr. Chairman,
Our administering power continues to unilaterally usurp the
marine resources of the people of French Polynesia contained in
the 5 millions square kilometers of Economic Exclusive Zone of
deep ocean. These resources include the vast array of “strategic
metals” such as rare earths, manganese, cobalt, and more.
This deprives the people of French Polynesia of the means to
build a sustainable economic and social future, and to move
away from the profound economic dependency created by the
false economy based on the legacy of the French nuclear
testings.
Further economic exploitation occurs by other means.
Since 2009, revenue in the form of taxes paid by more than 10
airlines to land at our own Tahiti-Faa’a International Airport goes
to the French treasury. Even taxes from our own airline Air Tahiti
Nui are paid to France, along with fees paid to cross through our
own airspace.
For decades, the fees associated with at least 12 geostationary
satellites that cross our spatial area, the
telecommunications system - including fiber-optic cables crossing
our seabed -, and many more revenue-generating
competencies have been controlled by our administering power.
Mr. Chairman,
Natural resources and revenues from the territories
appear to be the essence of contemporary colonialism. But
the inalienable right to self-determination of the People of French
Polynesia shall not be impeded by the orchestrated colonial
pretext of “inadequacy of political, economic, social or educational
preparedness”.
We stand ready to work with the U.N. to implement the
decolonization mandate for our people, as a matter of urgency.
Justice delayed, is justice denied.
Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Labels:
Asia,
Colonialism,
France,
French Polynesia,
human rights violations,
Ma'oh Nui,
non self-governing territories,
nuclear testing,
Pacific,
radiation,
United Nations
Frank Martinus, Curacao Linguist, Activist, political thinker joins the ancestors
Writer Frank Martinus Arion Passed Away
WILLEMSTAD – The popular writer Arion (78) has passed away. A close friend just announced that to media in Curaçao.
Arion wrote in Dutch and Papiamento. His most famous book is “Dubbelspel”, the novel with which he made his debut in 1973.
The book was also made into a film and was the leading book in the 2006 campaign “The Netherlands Reads”. Dubbelspel was handed out for free through the libraries in the Dutch Kingdom.
Frank Martinus Arion, pseudonym of Frank Efraim Martinus, was born on December 17, 1936 in Curaçao in the Netherlands Antilles. He is a poet and a novelist, and a language advocate.
He moved to the Netherlands in 1955 and in 1981 returned to Curaçao, where he became head of the Curaçao Language Institute that promotes the use of the Papiamento language. His works include The Last Freedom (De laatste vrijheid)and Double Play (Dubbelspel). The latter novel is considered to be his magnum opus and was published in 1973.
Labels:
Caribbean,
culture,
Curacao,
human rights defender
11 October 2015
Columbus - "He fool everybody, with a whole lot of fantasy"
Columbus Day
12th October
(How we can celebrate dat ?)
| notmytribe.com |
"...The man with the Santa Maria
Was as great as a man can be
He sailed down to Venezuela
For another discovery
He said he discovered new lands
And he thought I wouldn’t know
He discovered a lot of Indians
Who discovered the lands before..." - Mighty Shadow
NKB
Labels:
aboriginal,
Caribbean,
Colonialism,
human rights violations,
indigenous peoples,
Latin America
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)


