14 September 2015

No compromise for Okinawa? Protests or not, work on US base in Japan resumes

RT


The relocation process of a US military base in Japan’s Okinawa has been resumed, even though month-long talks between Tokyo and local authorities angered by the “troublesome neighbour” still haven’t broken the impasse.
The “concentrated discussions” on the project that faced fierce opposition of the locals ended in vain on Saturday and the construction works in Henoko, Okinawa, have now resumed, Japan’s Kyodo news agency reports. 
The decision has sparked a wave of indignation among residents who demand the base to be shut down and rebuilt elsewhere in Japan or overseas. They took to the streets of Henoko, a small coastal area in Okinawa.
READ FULL REPORT HERE.

*****

Governor suggests revoking approval of landfill, 

exerting every possible effort to block new US base



Ryukyu Shimpo
The final meeting of the intensive consultations between the Okinawa Prefectural and the central governments over the plan to move U.S. Marine Corps Air Station Futenma to Henoko was held at 4:20 p.m. on September 7 at the Prime Minister’s Office.
The talks broke down with the governments unable to find any common ground or resolve the issue. They remain as far apart as ever.
Governor Takeshi Onaga said to Prime Minister Shinzo Abe and leaders of the central government, “I will exert every possible effort to block [the new U.S. base].” He showed his intention to cancel the former Governor Hirokazu Nakaima’s approval of the landfill in Henoko.
Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshihide Suga told the governor that the government would resume the relocation work in Henoko after the prefectural government ends its diving survey in the sea off the coast of Camp Schwab.

The government suspended the land reclamation boring survey for one month. The central and the prefectural governments met for intensive consultations five times.

At the final consultation meeting, Prime Minister Abe asserted that the government was committed to removing the risks of the Futenma base, reducing the burden of the U.S. bases on Okinawa, and increasing Okinawa promotion measures.
The consultation was held behind closed doors, but media were allowed to take photographs at the beginning of the meeting.
Deputy Governor Mitsuo Ageda questioned the central government’s claim that the Henoko plan is the only option. According to the deputy governor, the then cabinet approved the initial Henoko plan on the condition that the government would build an airport for joint military-civilian use, but the then cabinet scrapped the plan in 2006.

Governor Onaga said, “I will respect as much as possible the conclusion that the third-party committee submitted.” He showed his intention to revoke the former governor’s approval of the landfill in Henoko, which the committee found was legally flawed.
After the meeting, the governor said, “I recognize the consultation has broken down.”
The chief cabinet secretary also said, “We have a consensus on the need to remove the risk and close the Futenma base. However, we could not fill a big gap between us in our methodological approach.” He expressed his intention to continue the dialogue.

Govenor Onaga refuted the prime minister’s claim that the government will reduce the base burden on Okinawa. “We have heard just the same story from then prime ministers and then ministers many times. I doubt they are going to solve this issue after 100 years,” Onaga said.
“When will the government’s promise be achieved? I am concerned that people who take it as truth will believe that the Abe administration is working hard for Okinawa. There will be no way for us to solve the issue. I have a strong belief that the government should not keep telling the same story,” Onaga said.
Prime Minister Abe, Chief Cabinet Secretary Suga, Foreign Minister Fumio Kishida, Defense Minister Gen Nakatani, Minister of State for Okinawa and Northern Territories Affairs Shunichi Yamaguchi, Deputy Chief Cabinet Secretary Kazuhiro Sugita from the central government and Governor Onaga, Deputy Governor Ageda from Okinawa attended the final consultation meeting.
(English translation by T&CT)

10 September 2015

International Day against Nuclear Testing commemorated on September 10



The United Nations (U.N.) has adopted several resolutions on effects of nuclear testing in French Polynesia. Most recently,  by its Resolution 69/103 of 5 December 2014, the General Assembly took note of the  the report of the U.N.Secretary-General on the environmental, ecological, health and other impacts of the 30-year period of nuclear testing in French Polynesia. French Polynesian political leaders have spoken on the lingering impacts of such testing in addresses before the United Nations.





*****

General Assembly Informal Meeting Commemorating Sixth Annual International Day against Nuclear Tests to Showcase Global Non-Proliferation Efforts




The International Day against Nuclear Tests will be observed on 10 September at United Nations Headquarters. This year’s official opening ceremony, marked by an informal meeting, will be convened by the President of the sixty-ninth session of the General Assembly, Sam Kutesa, and organized in cooperation with the Permanent Mission of the Republic of Kazakhstan.

In its resolution 64/35, the General Assembly designated 29 August as a day to commemorate against nuclear tests, as a result of the closing on that date in 1991 of Semipalatinsk in Kazakhstan, one of the largest nuclear weapon test sites in the world.

The sixth annual International Day against Nuclear Tests will showcase efforts of the United Nations and partners and other stakeholders, including Member States, intergovernmental and non-governmental organizations, academic institutions, youth networks and the media, in informing and educating on the importance of the nuclear weapon test ban with the aim of achieving worldwide security.

Around the globe, advocates for a nuclear-weapon-free world will be organizing and participating in activities ranging from debates and exhibits to conferences and competitions to call attention to the urgent imperative for the international community to rally in support of banning nuclear weapons testing once and for all.

The opening ceremony will be followed by a high-level panel, featuring experts in the field of arms control and non-proliferation, which will focus on the theme of “Towards Zero: Resolving the Contradictions”. Speakers will present observations and comments from their perspective on ways to promote progress and achieve common ground among different approaches towards nuclear disarmament and non-proliferation.

This year’s theme is especially apropos with regard to the outcome of the 2015 Review Conference of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT), in which parties to the treaty were unable to reach a consensus. In a statement to the Review Conference, Deputy Secretary-General Jan Eliasson said, on behalf of the Secretary-General, that “it is especially troubling that recent developments indicate that the trend towards nuclear zero is reversing. Instead of progress towards new arms reduction agreements, we have allegations about destabilizing violations of existing agreements.” This failure to come to an agreement highlights the urgency of the situation and the need to promote cooperation within the international community towards advancing the goals of the NPT.

The informal meeting is open to all diplomats, think tanks, the academic community, civil society and the media.

The complete programme can be found at: www.un.org/en/events/againstnucleartestsday/2015/events.shtml.

For further information on the Day and on the nuclear tests-related issues, please visit www.un.org/en/no-nucleartests, which is available in all six UN official languages.

*****

Also see:

09 September 2015

Turks & Caicos Government decries United Kingdom colonial practice of using territory's revenue to fund British security needs


ACTING Premier and Minister of Finance Washington Misick on Wednesday (August 26) condemned the Governor’s appropriation of tax payers’ money for the Special Investigation and Prosecution Team’s (SIPT) security needs.

Responding to Governor Peter Beckingham’s announcement of the allocation of $2.2 million, $1.3 million less than was initially requested, to the police for the provision of the SIPT security, Misick reiterated the earlier stance by the TCI Government that the alleged threat is of little consequence when the country has more pressing and important needs to be met.

He said it is morally wrong for the UK government to be open fisted with TCIG tax payers’ money.

The allocation was made in accordance with section 4(3) of the Chief Financial Officer Ordinance and section 72(1)(b) of the constitution.

"We are amazed at the speed, and ease at which UK ministers make decisions negatively impacting the public purse of the TCI when it is expedient to their agenda.

"These actions fly in the face of transparency and the generally accepted principles of public sector budgeting practice by TCIG, and insisted on by the UK,” Misick said.

He added that the explanation for the unilateral appropriation of funds claim that the money is to cover expenses to the end of March 2016.

However, he noted that: "The truth is that given the snail’s pace at which matters are progressing, this process will not be completed by March 2016 and may go on indefinitely thereby attracting additional recurrent cost of $4 to $5 million dollars annually.”

He said it is the view of the Government that the decision to increase funding to SIPT demonstrates bias and scant regard for the welfare of the people of the TCI.

"Key infrastructure expenditures including that for a new/reconditioned RO plant for Grand Turk are routinely denied.

"One off expenditure such as ex-gratia payments to recently retiring low wage earners in the public service who have no prospects of alternative employment or any other means to support themselves, and who had a legitimate expectation to receive such payments based on policy have also been denied.

"These decisions beg the question do TCI lives matter?” the minister questioned.

He said if additional funding is to be provided to the police it should first be provided to fight youth on youth violence, community policing and border protection as is their international obligation which they continuously neglect.

He added: "The people of these Islands have sacrificed much to return to fiscal stability.

"It is a slap in the face that their sacrifice is being rewarded by diverting resources away from infrastructure development and social programmes.

"My Government decries the continued draconian stance by Britain towards the people of these Islands and will not be silent in the face of its imperious posture."

*****



THE TEN defendants charged with various acts of corruption during Michael Misick’s term in office have refuted and rejected claims by the Governor that a terrorist threat exists and as such additional funds are needed to protect the prosecutors in the case.

On Wednesday (August 26), the defendants called the allocation of $2.2 million to the police for protection of the Special Investigation and Prosecution Team (SIPT), a wicked and evil attempt by the British to create a climate of fear in the TCI, as they allegedly did before.

The defendants also stated that they will be seeking legal advice on defamation and the attempt by the Governor to frame them, due to his claims of a terrorist threat to the SIPT.


See the full text of the defendants’ combined statement to the press this past week:


"We, the defendants in these corruption cases that were brought by the British government, categorically deny and totally reject any suggestion by Governor Peter Beckingham that the threat of terrorism is the reason why $2.2million of Turks and Caicos Islands Government’s money will now be allocated to provide security for Special Prosecutor Helen Garlick and her team.

"In our view, for the British Government to override the decision of the Premier and Cabinet of the Turks and Caicos Islands, which had decided against granting these funds, is nothing more than a continuation of the UK’s financial rape of our country, a blatant abuse of their power and the criminal justice system, and a wicked, evil and dangerous attempt to create the misleading impression of climate of fear in the Turks and Caicos Islands as they did before.

"We also wish to inform the people of these Islands, our neighbouring CARICOM countries and indeed the rest of the world, that allegations of possible terrorism and threats of criminal activity against the prosecution team are lame, fabricated excuses that have been trumped-up only to justify giving additional funds to Special Prosecutor Helen Garlick, Prosecutor Andrew Mitchell and their colleagues in the British legal fraternity who have been abusing the criminal justice system in the Turks and Caicos Islands as part of a well-orchestrated get-rich scheme, by politically prosecuting and persecuting former Cabinet ministers and others.

"By overriding the Cabinet in such a high-handed, shameful and disrespectful manner, UK Ministers Shapps and Swayne have now joined their failed predecessors who were active participants in the pork-barrel politics when it comes to the TCI, whereby a gravy-train and slush fund have been created strictly for the use and benefit of UK interests. It is modern-day economic slavery of the highest and most despicable order.

"With the Turks and Caicos Islands Government having already paid an average of $11 million per year to the Helen Garlick and her Special Investigation and Prosecution Team, it is now a disgraceful financial scandal that Mr David Cameron’s British government would order that this additional $2.2 million is paid to them.

"Despite the Governor’s reference to our country’s recent prosperity the TCI desperately needs repairs to important infrastructure, many Government departments can’t get basic supplies, Grand Turk is in desperate of water making equipment, young men and women can't get scholarships, hospitals lack critical supplies, and the police have to beg for necessary equipment while dead bodies pile up at the morgues (the recent travesty with the police only having one working vehicle, while the SIPT had numerous, being the perfect example).

"Despite that sad state of affairs the Governor thinks he can now find $2.2 million in the TCI Treasury to waste on the SIPT’s security.

"Governor Peter Beckingham is well aware of these things and he should therefore know better than seeking to justify this unnecessary expenditure by wrongfully trying to compare the Turks and Caicos Islands to places like Mumbai, Thailand and Bangkok where terrorism exists.

"The Governor also knows that the defendants are not the ones responsible for the delays in these trials.

"Not only are appeals a part of the right of all defendants, but the record would show that the authorities had refused to grant additional funds to ensure that defence lawyers were adequately paid.

"As for the defendants dragging out the trials for the last 18 months, it will not be lost on any resident that Helen Garlick and her SIPT have been here for more than six years.

"During that time they have been changing laws, introducing entirely new legislation, collecting hundreds of thousands of pages of documents, cutting deals with expatriates they say were corrupt, and turning a blind eye to persons they feel might embarrass the current British government.

"In a country that claims to have free and democratic traditions, and to be ruled by law the defendants have an absolute right to challenge the lawfulness of what, from even a cursory glance, are highly engineered trials, as well as the SIPT’s interference and management of every facet of the criminal justice system in order to secure convictions.

"It is quite sad and unfortunate when a British-appointed Governor would seek to deal such a devastating blow to the image of these beautiful by nature Islands by associating us with terrorism and high-level criminal activity, when no such characterisation of the Turks and Caicos Islands can be found on the websites of the UK’s own Foreign and Commonwealth Office, nor the Central Intelligence Agency or the US State Department.

"Indeed, the Governor, Helen Garlick, Andrew Mitchell and the many UK and other residents of the Turks and Caicos Islands know full well that we live in a peaceful, safe and low-crime country.

"It is well known in these Islands that many members of Ms Garlick’s team of investigators and lawyers have been living-it-up in luxury in the Turks and Caicos Islands for the past five years, partying excessively and intermingling with residents of these Islands and they have not encountered any threats or violence.

"This, therefore, is why we want the people of these Islands and the rest of world to fully understand the real and true background and context of this ridiculous, unfair and unreasonable order by the British government to force TCIG to give the Special Investigation and Prosecution Team $2.2 million.

"As a country and as a people, we cannot continue to turn a blind eye to these horrible injustices which the British continue to inflict on our people.

"These things are wrong and unjust and we will continue to expose them to the world as we remain steadfast in our fight for justice, because in the final analysis it all points to the fact that the British government, the Attorney General Helen Garlick and the criminal justice system will do everything in their power to justify these show trials, which cannot and will not be fair to us.

"It is worth noting that the Governor has refused to account to parliament on how the SIPT monies are being spent until after the trials, this in itself is in breach of good governance and sets the SIPT above every other Government department that have to give account for tax payers’ money.

"We call on the Government to set up an Independent Commission of Inquiry as to the operations and spending of the SIPT, they have spent over $60 million of Turks and Caicos Islands money over the past six years.

"To this end, we shall seek immediate legal advice for defamation and trying to frame us.”

08 September 2015

Okinawa Governor Onaga to address U.N. Human Rights Council

Okinawa Governor Onaga to address UN
Okinawa Governor Takeshi Onaga

The United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) is scheduled to hold its 30th session in Geneva, Switzerland from September 14 to October 2. It was confirmed on July 22 that Okinawa Governor Takeshi Onaga will deliver a speech at the UNHRC’s upcoming session. The Shima Gurumi Association, which aims to prevent new U.S. base construction in Henoko, has been working with several UN nongovernmental organizations to arrange for the governor to address the UN. The association is arranging for Onaga to deliver a speech at the UN on September 21 or 22.
Soon after being elected, governor Onaga showed his eagerness to work with the UN. If Onaga addresses the UN, it could spark debate on the Henoko relocation issue and could influence international opinion.
Receiving a request from the Shima Gurumi Association, the Citizens’ Diplomatic Centre for the Rights of Indigenous Peoples showed its intention to give Onaga an opportunity to address in UNHRC. It is common for nongovernmental organizations with special consultative status at the UN to give third parties an opportunity to address UN sessions.
A representative of the center and professor at Keisen University Hideaki Kamiura was optimistic about Onaga’s address. “If governor Onaga can address the UNHRC, which deals with human rights issues, UN members will be able to see that what he says is a consensus of Okinawan people. It could possibly put pressure on the U.S. and Japanese governments,” he said.
In order to enable Onaga to address the UNHRC, the Shima Gurumi Association has been working with a UN authorized NGO, IMADR. While IMADR is in charge of scheduling for this session, it is the Citizens’ Diplomatic Centre that has provided Onaga a space to speak.
UNHRC sessions are held three times every year. The next conference will be held from September 14 to October 2. The regular meeting of the Okinawa Prefectural Assembly, which would normally be held in the middle of September, is unlikely to conflict with Onaga’s address because there will be five consecutive national holidays from September 19 to 23, making the governor’s schedule more flexible.
Prefectural assembly member Yoshikazu Tamaki who is also the executive director of the Shima Gurumi Association said he hoped the UN address would soon be confirmed.
“We will talk to Onaga about the schedule for addressing the UN after he comes back from Singapore. Although we cannot yet be sure whether we can lock in the schedule, we would like to make it happen,” he said.
(English translation by T&CT)

West Papua Becomes Most Controversial Issue in PIF Agenda




Secretary of Pacific Islands Forum, Dame Meg Taylor - Suplied

Secretary of Pacific Islands Forum, Dame Meg Taylor 

Jayapura, Jubi – The Pacific Islands Forum (PIF) kicked off on 4 September 2015 with a workshop on Regional Media launched by the Secretary of Pacific Islands Forum, Dame Meg Taylor.
She told reporters that fisheries, climate change, human rights violations in West Papua, cervical cancer, and Information, Communication and Technology were on the agenda.
However, she did not give further detail on three recommendations that previously driven by PIF Secretariat to be discussed among the leaders of Pacific countries. Earlier, Taylor, who’s the first female Secretary General of PIF, said the Pacific leaders were possibly recommend three points of action, including sending an investigation team of the ministers of Pacific countries to West Papua, enforcing West Papua to be listed in the list of decolonization and providing sanctions against Indonesian private companies and State companies that convicted to human rights violations. She also said the allegation on human right violations has been submitted to the Pacific leaders as consideration.


“Three submissions that representing more than 30 civil society organizations throughout the Pacific have been proposed in the agenda. In term of nomenclature, these submissions have indicated the West Papua as a term used to describe the allegation on human right violations. Needless to say that West Papua is becoming the most controversial issue in the agenda,” said Taylor.

She further added in the discussion with Pacific leaders to prepare PIF, two issues that might be rejected in the forum are West Papua and cervical cancer.


“I will not answer it. I want the civil society in the Pacific to think and tell me what to do and the best way that I could inform the leaders, as I will meet with sixteen Pacific leaders on next week and I’ve been received a lot of opinions. They would consider these five issues. They might not discuss the entire issues, but West Papua issue would be a challenge for several Pacific countries. And about cervical cancer, many people do not understand about how important is this issue to be discussed for the sake of women and girls. The disease is killing many women in the Pacific,” said Taylor.

She also admitted the civil society groups in the Pacific pushed West Papua to be returned in UN decolonization list, like Tahiti. She confirmed that ahead to PIF, the civil society and non-governmental organizations throughout the Pacific (PIANGO) held a meeting from 1 to 3 September 2015 in Port Moresby, in which she was also participated. Two main issues that pushed by the civil society groups are Climate Change and West Papua.
The Executive Director of PIANGGO, Emele Duituturaga told Jubi on Saturday (5/9/2015) that despite the international agreement on the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, civil society groups in the Pacific also requested the Pacific leaders to pay attention on West Papua issue. “We have a direct resource from West Papua concerning to the violence of human right violations. Yes, we recognized that it is under question. That is the reason why we urged the investigation team to investigate the human right violations. It’s urgent,” said Duituturaga. She added PIANGO and other civil society groups in the Pacific also asked the Pacific leaders to enforce Papua to be listed in UN decolonization list.
Separately, Octovianus Mote, the Secretary General of United Liberation Movement of West Papua (ULMWP) convicted about the struggle of the people of West Papua for an independence and sovereignty will succeed. It’s demonstrated through the supports of civil society that continually increased. Papua has become an issue not only in Melanesia but also in the South Pacific.


“Papua has become a concern of the entire South Pacific countries because the problem of Papua is the problem of the people in South Pacific. It’s not only covering Melanesia, but also Polynesia and Micronesia,” said Mote. He further added though there are government of certain countries that are trying to blockage the ULMWP leaders to safe their good relations with Indonesia, but they would not able to block the “people’s power” that are rolling in the South Pacific.

Concerning the issue of decolonization of West Papua, the former Kompas journalist said the Government of Solomon Islands is at the front.


“The decolonization of West Papua is part of the struggle of liberation of West Papua under the leadership of Papua Islands that is currently the Chairman of MSG,” Mote said. (Victor Mambor)

07 September 2015

A new hopeful chapter in West Papua’s 50-year freedom struggle


A new hopeful chapter in West Papua’s 50-year freedom struggle

Leaders from the Church of Melanesia, and Lilly Chekana and Grace Hilly from the Solomon Islands Solidarity for West Papua, lead a march in Honiara in support of West Papua becoming a member of the Melanesian Spearhead Group on June 19. (WNV/ Pasifika collection)
Leaders from the Church of Melanesia, and Lilly Chekana and Grace Hilly from the Solomon Islands Solidarity for West Papua, lead a march in Honiara in support of West Papua becoming a member of the Melanesian Spearhead Group on June 19. (WNV/ Pasifika collection)

Markus Haluk’s eyes are moist. We are standing inside a portside warehouse in Honiara, the capital city of the Solomon Islands. Haluk carefully unwraps the first of five large 60 pound packages encased in hessian. Inside each parcel are two large A4-sized books, parts of a massive paper petition. Each book is around 16 inches thick — they make a dictionary look like a comic book. Haluk was the lead organizer tasked with collating the hefty tomes and getting them safely out of West Papua. Yosepa Alomang, a 50-something-year-old stalwart of the West Papuan independence movement, worked alongside him and she is also now in the warehouse. Alomang reaches out and touches the books. Turning to me she says, “These are the blood and bones of our people.”

Alomang means what she says. During the signature-raising campaign which took place between March and May 2015, Indonesian security forces shot dead 32-year-old Obangma Giban, a village chief from Yahukimo. In the month of May, alone, 487 activists were arrested for participating in the campaign. Some of those were tortured. Officers from the Mobile Police Brigade in Manokwari, part of a national Indonesian paramilitary police force, stubbed out cigarettes on Alexander Nekenem’s body while the head of the Manokwari Regional Police, Tommy H. Pontororing, denied him and his compatriots access to lawyers. Police also demolished communication posts at places like Cendrawasih University, where people could go to sign the petitions. Countless scores were savagely beaten.


READ THE FULL ARTICLE HERE.



PNG blocks Benny Wenda’s visa bid again – open Pacific plea for West Papua


Pacific Scoop



Benny Wenda’s statement:


"My Papua New Guinea VISA Application Rejected Again"


To West Papua, ULMWP and all the Melanesian and Pacific family,

Papua New Guinea (PNG) has rejected my application for a visa to enter the country for the second time. I am disappointed that PNG as a democratic country which values democracy, freedom and justice has come to this decision. The first, I was informed that the issue was an administrative matter and the reason given was that I did not complete the necessary PNG immigration documents and procedures.

As per an invite by the Governor of the National Capital District (NCD), Hon. Powes Parkop to attend a human rights refugee conference, and also take part in other events including PNG’s 40th independence celebrations, and the Pacific Island Forum in my capacity as the spokesperson for the United Liberation Movement for West Papua (ULMWP); I launched a full visa application which was checked by my lawyer and I preceded with flight bookings.

A few hours before I was due to board my flight from London Heathrow to Port Moresby this week, I found out that the PNG immigration rejected my visa application, and as a result, I have cancelled this trip to PNG. There were no proper details or formal explanation from the PNG High Commission in London as to why my visa application was rejected.

I respect the decision by PNG Government and its immigration department, but I hereby appeal to the government to not penalise the struggle of the people of West Papua. I strongly urge Prime Minister, Peter O’Neill and all Pacific leaders to stand firm as Pacific leaders and support the issue of West Papua at the leaders meeting next week.

West Papua is one of five top priority areas on the Pacific Island leaders Forum agenda, and I appeal to the people of PNG and the Pacific to rally your support on the recommendations set before the leaders.

We the ULMWP are calling on our Pacific leaders to form a high level PIF delegation to undertake a fact finding mission to investigate the human rights abuses in West Papua; and to strongly urge the United Nation to appoint a special envoy on human rights to West Papua.

There is growing support in the Pacific, and I want to personally thank my Pacific brothers and sisters who are always supportive of our freedom journey. Please continue to support the people of West Papua in our struggle for freedom. Thank you also to friends in Australia, New Zealand, and those globally who continue to support West Papua freedom movements.

Benny Wenda
West Papua Independence Leader
Spokesperson for the United Liberation Movement for West Papua.
Papua Merdeka!

04 September 2015

Micronesian Immigration an ‘Important Civil Rights Issue’ Facing Hawaii

A federal advisory group is told about growing discrimination toward COFA citizens in housing, education, health care and employment.

By CHAD BLAIR 

How serious is discrimination against Micronesians living and working Hawaii?

Very serious, and it is found in our schools, our workplaces, and our hospitals and clinics. It is also having a direct impact on Micronesians trying to find affordable housing and steady jobs.

So said a dozen officials, social workers and community activists who shared their views at a hearing at the Hawaii State Capitol on Thursday.

The occasion was a meeting of a Hawaii advisory committee to the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, which plans to share what it heard about discrimination against Micronesians with Congress.

READ THE FULL ARTICLE HERE.

03 September 2015

Guam Government celebrates its athletes following Pacific Games



Athlete awards ceremony held at Government House


Press Release
Office of the Governor

Governor Eddie Baza Calvo and First Lady Christine Calvo held an awards ceremony at Government House...recognizing some of Guam’s top athletes. Guam medalists from the 2016 Pacific Games, the Guam Men’s Rugby team, and the Matao all received certificates of recognition from the Governor and the First Lady.

“Guam’s athletes are building a reputation for Guamanians as global competitors,” said Governor Calvo. “These athletes prove that Guam can stand toe-to-toe against athletes of other nations.”

What started out as an event to recognize men and women who represented Guam in recent sporting events, has evolved into a quarterly ceremony. The next event will be held in November.


“As we imagine a Guam where our children dream of athletic success, we should also encourage them to dream big. Today’s athletes continue to pave the way for Guamanian athletes of the future,” the Governor stated.

vvvvvEnd of Releasevvvvv

02 September 2015

United Nations wants to scrub Black Pete’s face





AMSTERDAM--The United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination has released its report on discrimination in the Netherlands following a meeting with the Dutch delegation in Venice, Italy, last week. The committee highlighted a number of concerns and made recommendations regarding, among other things, Black Pete, ethnic profiling by the police, racist statements made by politicians, anti-Semitic chants during soccer games, the asylum policy and ethnic-bullying in schools.

"Considering that even a deeply rooted cultural tradition does not justify discriminatory practices and stereotypes, the Committee recommends that [the Netherlands – Ed.] actively promotes the elimination of those features of the character of Black Pete which reflect negative stereotypes and are experienced by many people of African descent as a vestige of slavery. The Committee recommends that the State find a reasonable balance, such as a different portrayal of Black Pete and ensure respect of human dignity and human rights of all inhabitants of the State," the Committee writes. 

Black Pete, or "Zwarte Piet" in Dutch, helps the Dutch version of Santa Claus distribute presents every year in early December and is displayed as a silly, mischievous and indolent character, usually animated by an actor in blackface. In recent years, he has become a lightning rod for a cultural debate, and has even sparked violence. 

During his weekly press conference on Friday, Prime Minister Mark Rutte said Black Pete was not a matter of state. "Beware of a country where the State decides what folk tradition should look like. I really think that is something for the people to decide and not a matter of politics," said Rutte. 

The Black Pete issue was a small element of the report on the Netherlands which is produced every five years and looks at racism and discrimination in general. 

The committee noted that not all Dutch municipalities have an anti-discrimination policy that is in line with the State's policy on anti-discrimination and added that it is the national government's responsibility to ensure that all cities comply. 

They also expressed concerns about "incidents of racist and xenophobic hate speech emanating from a number of extremist political parties and politicians," the prevalence of "racist discourse in the media" and the increase of racist statements and threats on the Internet. 

In this regard, the Committee is particularly concerned about the sharp increase in discrimination against members of Jewish and Muslim communities, including the reported increase in verbal abuse, harassment, and physical violence against Jewish and Muslim persons. 

The fact that anti-Semitic chants are "commonplace at football stadiums" is also a big problem, the Committee stated. 

The UN Committee recommends that the Netherlands "adopt a firm stand against the use of hate speech for political purposes, increase efforts to combat racially motivated hate speech and ensure that criminal acts perpetrated on grounds of 'intersectionality' between ethnic origin and religion are duly investigated and prosecuted." 

The Committee also recommends that a national plan of action against racial discrimination be developed and adopted, especially given the fact of continuing racial profiling by the police which has "produced feelings of mistrust among minority groups and discourages them from accessing help when they are victims of crime or rights abuses." 

According to the Committee, the current policy on migrant integration has shifted from the State to migrant communities. "This approach puts migrants in particularly vulnerable situations at risk of receiving insufficient attention and support, leaves them vulnerable to social exclusion and hampers their integration." 

They are also concerned about the asylum policy stating that undocumented migrants only receive assistance if they comply with their own expulsion. 

"The Committee reiterates its previous recommendations, and urges the State to ensure that its integration policies reflect the responsibilities of the State," the Committee said in its report. 

The government should also ensure that undocumented migrants are provided with food and shelter in all circumstances prior to deportation and that they have access to healthcare in all parts of the Dutch Kingdom, which is currently not the case in Curaçao and Aruba. 

The Netherlands has to report back to the Committee in 2019 on changes and improvements made.
____________________


The Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (CERD) is the body of independent experts that monitors implementation of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination by its State parties.

All States parties are obliged to submit regular reports to the Committee on how the rights are being implemented. States must report initially one year after acceding to the Convention and then every two years. The Committee examines each report and addresses its concerns and recommendations to the State party in the form of “concluding observations”.

In addition to the reporting procedure, the Convention establishes three other mechanisms through which the Committee performs its monitoring functions: the early-warning procedure, the examination of inter-state complaintsand the examination of individual complaints.

The Committee meets in Geneva and normally holds two sessions per year consisting of three weeks each.
The Committee also publishes its interpretation of the content of human rights provisions, known as general recommendations (or general comments), on thematic issues and organizes thematic discussions.

For more information about the work of the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination, click here.

01 September 2015

Guam lowers its debt payments through lower interest bonds

Press Release
Office of the Governor

Guam lowered its debt, moving $412.5 million of loans issued in 2007 and 2009 from low-rated general obligation bonds to A-rated BPT bonds. The interest rate dropped from approximately 6.42% (7.28% for the 2009 GO and 5.56% 2007 GO) to the lowest rate for long-term bonds GovGuam has ever been assigned: 4.02%.

That lower rate ends up saving taxpayers $45.3M in debt payments. Guam saves $1.975M as soon as the sale is final.

Economies throughout the world are faltering or struggling. However, Guam’s business privilege tax collections have been strong and are steadily growing. Not only does that show investors in our bonds that GovGuam is relying on a good repayment source for our debts, it also is indicative of continuous growth in our economy.

Investors had so much confidence in the Calvo administration’s handling of finances and the state of the Guam economy that they made of $1 billion in orders for $412.5M in Guam bonds. This confidence in the BPT from the financial markets is in stark contrast to the Guam Legislature’s stance on the BPT, which is what led 13 senators to under-fund several agencies and critical services.

The Series D Bonds were sold in an extremely challenging market characterized by extreme volatility in both equity and debt markets. The stock market fluctuated wildly during the week, sparked by concerns over growth in China, while Treasury bond yields rose 12 basis points during the day of pricing. It was also a busy Municipal Bonds selling calendar with Guam’s BPT Bonds being offered alongside the California’s $2 billion GO Bonds and the state of New Jersey’s $2.2 billion Appropriation Bonds.

The BPT Series 2015D Bonds refunded all of the 2007 General Obligation (GO) Bonds and all of the callable 2009 GO Bonds. The BPT Bonds were rated ‘A’ by Standard and Poor’s and ‘A-‘ by Fitch Ratings, both with a stable outlook.

“This outstanding performance in a very difficult and busy bond market is yet another reflection of how this administration’s fiscal policies are helping to stabilize the overall financial health of the government,” Governor Eddie Baza Calvo said. “Had we received legislative approval back when the bill was originally introduced in April, the Government could have achieved even more savings. I thank my team for successfully moving forward despite all these hurdles.”

The BPT Series 2015 D Bonds are expected to close next Thursday.

The legislature authorized the 2007 General Obligation (GO) Bonds to pay for capital improvement projects at the Guam Memorial Hospital and other health care needs. The 2009 GO Bonds paid for Tax refunds, COLA settlement agreement, GMHA CIPs and past due retirement fund contributions on behalf of GMHA and GDOE. These bonds were issued years before Governor Calvo became the governor.

Taxpayers were paying a much higher interest rate on these bonds because of the financial crisis and huge deficits of those days.

vvvvvEnd of Releasevvvvv

Cayman should demand to have World Organisation membership

The Cayman Reporter



Today the Cayman Islands face many challenges especially when it pertains to its financial services industry. Although a small nation, the Cayman Islands has become accustomed to manoeuvring around the global financial arena and dealing with various threats such as being placed on financial blacklists

It would be beyond the scope of this editorial to even try and project the growing demand amongst the OECD and the EU to force Overseas Territories (OT) such as the Cayman Islands to forcefully comply with the transparency requirements that suit the economic and financial needs of their economies, regardless of the detrimental impact on the financial industry of the Cayman Islands.

Interestingly, many in our community are not aware that during 1991 to 1995 the British Overseas Territories (BOT) were consulted by the United Kingdom when its World Trade Organisation (WTO) membership was being negotiated as to whether the OTs wished to be covered. The OTs chose not to be and therefore are not represented in WTO talks. Basically the Cayman Islands, as one of the BOTs gave the UK the right to decide our financial services industry laws and future.

Overseas Territories use to benefit from preferential market access arrangements to the EU through the Generalised System of Preferences (GSP) or the Overseas Association Decision (OAD). Under current Commission proposals, Overseas Territories, with effect from 1 January 2014, no longer are eligible for the preferences under the GSP.”

Whatever the reason may have been for OTs agreeing to give all their negotiating powers to the mother country during the 90s, one thing has become quite clear. OTs such as the Cayman Islands have changed significantly over the past 20 years and should be seeking to be at the negotiating table to ensure that the Cayman Islands interests are considered and acted on.

In recent years we have seen too many incidents whereby it is apparent that the UK’s interests take precedence over the interest of the people in the Cayman Islands. How can we as a country be assured that the UK has been appropriately representing our interests in the international arena? Far too often we see our financial services industry coming under attack but rarely do we see the UK coming to our defence when the likes of the US come down on us.

Our constitution also makes it clear that the UK’s interest very well may come before ours. In ‘The Cayman Islands Constitution Order 2009’ section 31(3) it states, “In the exercise of his or her functions under subsection (2), the Governor shall endeavour to promote good governance and to act in the best interests of the Cayman Islands so far as such interests are consistent with the interests of the United Kingdom.” The final part of this clause makes it clear that the Governor, who should be acting in the best interest of the Cayman Islands, can refrain from doing so if Cayman’s interests are not aligned with that of the UK.

Maybe it is about time our government begin discussions on gaining back control over certain decision making abilities related to international trade and commerce, such as the ability to be represented at the WTO. If we cannot be assured that the UK will be looking out for the Cayman Islands best interest. It would be in our best interest to begin to take control of important aspects of our economy and country, especially when it pertains to international trade.