17 June 2014

U.N. Decolonisation Committee adopts annual resolutions on information on the remaining non self-governing territories


General Assembly
GA/COL/3268

Department of Public Information • News and Media Division • New York
Special Committee on Decolonization
3rd Meeting (AM)

Committee on Decolonization Approves 3 Draft Resolutions on Information Relating to Non-Self-Governing Territories



Committee Hears from Petitioners, Observers on Questions of Western Sahara, Gibraltar

Resuming its session today, the Special Committee on Decolonization approved, without a vote, three draft resolutions on information relating to the Non-Self-Governing Territories that remained under its purview.

Formally known as the Special Committee on the Situation with regard to the Implementation of the Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples, the 29-member body also took up the questions of Western Sahara and Gibraltar.

By the text on “Information from Non-Self-Governing Territories transmitted under Article 73 e of the Charter of the United Nations” (document A/AC.109/2014/L.3), the General Assembly would request the administering Powers to transmit regularly to the Secretary-General statistical and other information of a technical nature relating to economic, social and educational conditions in the Territories, as well as the fullest possible information on political and constitutional developments there.

By the text on “dissemination of information on decolonization” (document A/AC.109/2014/L.4), the Assembly would request the Departments of Political Affairs and of Public Information to implement the Special Committee’s recommendations and to continue their efforts to take measures through all the media available, including publications, radio and television, as well as the Internet, to give publicity to the work of the United Nations on decolonization.

In relation to that text, Laura Vaccari, Chief of the Decolonization Unit, Department of Political Affairs, and Margaret Novicki, Chief of the Communications Campaigns Service, Department of Public Information, briefed on their work.

The Special Committee also adopted, as orally revised, the draft resolution on “Question of sending visiting and special missions to Territories” (document A/AC.109/2014/L.5), by which it called upon the administering Powers that have not yet done so to cooperate or continue to cooperate with the Organization by facilitating United Nations visiting missions to the Territories under their administration.

Turning to the question of Western Sahara, Ahmed Boukhari, representative of the Frente Popular para la Liberación de Saguia el-Hamra y de Río de Oro (Frente Polisario), said that the area was the last African colony awaiting decolonization.  Yet, the last time a mission had been sent there was 1975.  Morocco had replaced Spain as the colonizer.  The United Nations had convinced Morocco of the need to hold a referendum, but it had never been held due to obstruction by Morocco.  The Secretary-General’s report to the Security Council had stated that United Nations efforts should continue until the decolonization process took place. 

Moving to the next topic, Fabian Picardo, Chief Minister of Gibraltar, said its leaders had been addressing the Special Committee since 1963.  Gibraltar would have been delisted long ago if it were not for the Spanish Government’s repeated attempts to block it.  He urged the Committee to provide its opinion on whether Gibraltar’s 2006 Constitution would deliver sufficient measure of self-government short of independence.  It should visit Gibraltar, attend an upcoming symposium and seek an advisory opinion from the International Count of Justice on its right to self-determination.

Spain’s delegate, speaking as an observer, said that the inhabitants of some territories had given up their political independence in exchange for guarantee of their economic stability.  Those were cases of “colonialism by consent”.  The Spanish who lived there until 1704, the real Gibraltarians, were forced to leave and settled in the neighboring town of San Roque.  Furthermore, the United Kingdom illegally seized other territories not ceded under the Treaty of Utrecht of 1713.  General Assembly resolution 2353 (1967) stated that the colonial situation of Gibraltar undermined the territorial integrity of Spain.  Furthermore, the administrating Power had admitted that the independence of its colony was not possible without Spain’s consent.  The United Kingdom, however, had been refusing for too many years to talk to Spain about the future of Gibraltar.

The Special Committee then heard from a petitioner, Denis Matthews, representative of the Self-Determination for Gibraltar Group.

Also participating as Observers during the meeting were representatives of Argentina, Brazil, Costa Rica, Ghana, Guatemala, Italy, Jamaica, Montenegro, Solomon Islands, Suriname, Turkey, Uganda and Uruguay.

The Special Committee will meet again on 23 June to hear petitioners concerning the situation in Puerto Rico.


READ FULL PRESS RELEASE HERE.

16 June 2014

Self-determination referendum for Bonaire being sabotaged

Concerns expressed that the referendum process is being undermined by the Netherlands in violation of  its international legal obligations to facilitate a genuine process of self-determination for the people of Bonaire. 

Worldatlas.com


Foundation Nos Kier Boneiru Bek,

P.O.  Box 341, Bonaire

Aan de Minister van Binnenlandse zaken en Koninkrijkrelaties, dr. R H A Plasterk
Aan de voorzitter van de Tweede Kamer der Staten-Generaal
Aan de voorzitter van de Eerste Kamer der Staten-Generaal
Aan de Raad van State
2500 EA Den Haag


Bonaire 13 juni 2014

Subject: Self-determination referendum for Bonaire


The illegality of the new state structure as of 10-10-10 for the BES islands* has been extensively exposed by various individuals and legal experts, state and international constitutional experts and pressure groups during the last four years.

Letters to the local government and 1st and 2nd chamber, representatives of the Kingdom-government, Petition to Her Majesty Queen Beatrix and His Majesty King Willem Alexander and complaint letters to the United Nations and protests-manifestations all focused and all pointed to the fact that the "new state structure for the BES islands "violate international laws and regulations in the area of self-determination and human rights, and is not legitimate.

The integration as "Public Body" since 10-10-10 is not based on a free choice. For that reason, the lack of the outcome of the referendum to express a explicit choice of the form of state structure, this illegal foundation on which is being build on,  violates resolutions 1514, 1541 and 2625 of the United Nations and further is in non-conformity with Chapter XI, Article 73, on "Declaration of non-self-Governing Territories".

Finally, the Minister of Kingdom Relations dr R Plasterk mid-December 2013 for the treatment and deliberation on defining the state budget of the Kingdom Relations (IV) for the year 2014 (33750-IV) clearly readdressed in response to parliamentary questions on our previously expressed position on the respect of our human and self-determination rights. He made it clear that there is a misunderstanding about the arrangements made for the constitutional changes that these do not comply or violate international law and that we still as Bonaire (BES) and in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations are entitled to a (new) referendum. The Minister made it clear that the Netherlands is a member of UN and respects these agreements, and that the BES islands themselves can take the initiative to correct these errors. Minister Plasterk ratified this by letter dated January 8, 2014 (reference No: 2014-0000012853) to Foundation Nos Kier Boneiru Bek, and the final paragraph reads:

"That the people of Bonaire has the right that their voice be heard and the right to self-determination, is an achievement that is not in question and is fully endorsed by the cabinet."

The Secretary-General of the Ministry of the Interior and Kingdom Relations Mr. Richard van Zwol who visited after this declaration on Bonaire ratified and further stated that if the people choose a different state associated with the Netherlands in the Kingdom, this will affect the Netherlands, and that the Netherlands must enter into this discussion with us.

On Bonaire, there is the constant call and a petition for a referendum to the Island Council (more than 3000 signees), as well as the good news that the Netherlands will cooperate with a possible new choice of the people, causing a positive effect among the political parties. Almost all political parties and mainly those represented in the Island Council have reached a "historic moment by uniting with the purpose of organizing a referendum" so that the people's voice can be heard because it has so far proved that the new status is not what they expected or have desired. This wish and resolution got a unanimous vote by all Island Council members on February 25, 2014 and is recorded and subsequently ratified by the decision of  April 4th and led to the establishment of an "Advisory Referendum Committee."

So the people of Bonaire which was divided by the 10-10-10 misleading into the new state structure "Public Body" was finally on the road to reconciliation and reunification. The people were relieved and happy that finally the political Bonaire got the signals from the people to given a chance to make its voice heard and respected and the feeling of togetherness as people was re-established on Bonaire.

The whole process was going in the right direction until the ex-politician, former leader of UPB party, Mr. Booi, was acquitted in the case brought by the Public Prosecutor's criminal case. Mr. Booi said immediately that he will return into politics and in the Island Council to address the issues with Netherlands again. It is striking that this takes place on the same day with the inauguration and use of the renovated Council building and called Council meeting to treat the report of the Referendum Commission officially, and immediately after his swearing as a Parliament member in his re-entrance speech made clear that there will be no referendum, now he is acquitted, he will negotiate with Netherlands to improve the situation on Bonaire. So the coalition formed by UPB fraction and fraction Santana, with Booi as a new member and new approach, decided at the end of the deliberations by roll call vote to stop the referendum process. He then presented to the Island Council a so called Mission Paper which the coalition adopted what he is going to negotiate with the Netherlands on the political structure and improvements for Bonaire.

This strikes the whole population like a bucket of cold water over them, because they finally started to get hope because of the positive development and unitying of the political Bonaire for Bonaire,where the desires of the people and their voice could eventually be heard by way of a referendum. But now, because of single-handed  dictatorial boycott of the referendum by Booi and group, they saw their voice and choice silenced.

We are directing ourselves to you with the request that you not to make any further arrangements with Booi, who by the way, according to the Prosecution still is  a suspect in the criminal proceedings against him,  and his group about our people's rights and that the treaties of the UN should be respected by all politicians, governments such as of Bonaire and the Netherlands, until the people have spoken through a referendum according to the right of self-determination.

It is clear that the state Public Body Bonaire is built on quicksand, and does not stand scrutiny of the  international law and that there should be a referendum to make right to the people of Bonaire.

It is now meanwhile a public secret that Mr. Booi, and against all logic and rationality, is acquitted to stop the referendum and  prevent the people of Bonaire on a dictatorial manner to exercise of her right to a referendum. The trust of the people in the democratic constitutional state has dropped to zero by these decisions and experiences.

There are plenty of indications that indicates that Booi acts under political duress by the Netherlands, otherwise he will be convicted. This has become a recurring phenomenon around the elections, which Booi is exactly acquitted in the run up to the election of his accusations and allegations and lawsuits will then  immediately with the acquittal capitalize on the political benefits and enjoy popularity and comes to power or stay in power.

I am willing to address this issue on this way because as I personally have experienced this at least twice. The first time was in the run-up to the election that Elvis Tjin A Sjoe, highest votegetter of the UPB, ex-minister, etc, my childhood friend, told me that the whole commotion about Booi's trial and allegations are not quite what it seems but a kind of scene that is resolved as the election nears. I had real problem with it, because the whole Bonairean political panorama and the state structure that was created illegally is defended and protected by Booi, a became a sort of ego trip, and has divided our nation and people, and that he and his political power will be extremely difficult that the right and the voice of the people will be exercised. 

The second time I came in touch with this issue is that after a radio and television interview at the station of Mr.Booi,  Radio Energia, about one and half year ago, I was adressed by him personally. He consciously and powerfully intimidated me that I had to stop protesting the state- structure because I am wasting too much energy and time of them with all of the protests, actions and letters etc, and better to had to work together with them to improve it. And my question how he will solve it, because before everyone and themselves publicly through the media has stated that nothing can be done to the state structure any more and we had to look forward and had to try to get the best out etc.His response and solution to me was that I was not to worry, because even though he is suspected and accused by the Public Prosecuter, he will be free of these and then go into the politics to negotiate with the Netherlands and improve the situation of the state structure. So through my own personal experience and contact with this public secret, it was not really a surprise to me that Booi just a week before the treatment of the referendum in the island council was acquitted, and he immediately went to fulfill and complete his mission as told to me personally, so stop of the referendum and the exclusion of people of Bonaire's to hear their voice, and further build with Netherlands on the "illegal" political status of Public Body Bonaire.

We ask that you properly take into account these statements that for the Bonairean people really the last drop has fallen in the full bucket, and really not to further force to take away her right and everyone's pretend their nose are bleeding and  continues to negotiate with Booi and his comrades.

If there is no possibility through an "administrative measure" by the Dutch government to organize for the people of Bonaire a self-determination-referendum in accordance with the requirements and regulations of the United Nations, because of the implicit boycott of Booi, then in the name of the people of Bonaire, by your recognition that the 10-10-10 agreements are not in conformity with the international human and self-determination right and has not been legitimized by Boneriean (and Statians)  people, no to discuss further any issues on states-structure, until the Boneriaans people in accordance with the UN resolutions and rules their voice and desire has been heard through a referendum.

 I hope on behalf of the Foundation Nos Kier Boneiru Bek and the over three thousand signees of a petition to hold a referendum,  that you agree with this request

Awaiting your substantiated response, I remain

On behalf of Foundation Nos Kier Boneiru Bek,

PoBox 341, Bonaire. Email: jamesfinies@gmail.com


* The BES Islands are Bonaire, Saba and Sint Eustatius which form three new partially integrated Dutch "public entities" emerged after the dissolution of the erstwhile Netherlands Antilles in 2010. The other two islands of the former political arrangement, Curacao and Sint Maarten, became separate'autonomous' countries in the Dutch Kingdom. The third Dutch 'autonomous country' in the region is Aruba which separated from the Netherlands Antilles in 1986.


*************


Original Dutch


Aan de Minister van Binnenlandse zaken en Koninkrijkrelaties, dr. R H A Plasterk

Aan de voorzitter van de Tweede Kamer der Staten-Generaal
Aan de voorzitter van de Eerste Kamer der Staten-Generaal
Aan de Raad van State
2500 EA Den Haag


Bonaire 13 juni 2014

Betreft: zelf-beschikkings-referendum voor Bonaire


De illegaliteit van het nieuwe staatsstructuur per 10-10-10 voor de BES eilanden is uitvoerig door verschillende individuen en legale experts, staatsgeleerden, internationale constitutionele experts en pressie groepen belicht gedurende de laatste vier jaren.

Brieven aan de lokale bestuurders en 1ste en 2de kamer, vertegenwoordigers van het Rijksbestuur, Petitie aan HM Konigin Beatrix en ZM Koning Willem Alexander en klachtbrieven aan de Verenigde Naties en protestacties allemaal gericht en wijzen allemaal op het feit dat de “nieuwe staatstructuur voor de BES eilanden” de internationale wetten en regels op het gebied van zelf-beschikking en mensenrechten overtreden en niet legitiem is.

Het integreren als “Openbaar Lichaam” sinds 10-10-10 is niet gebaseerd op een vrije keuze. Om die reden, leidt het ontbreken van het uitslag van de referendum tot expliciete keuze voor de staatsvorm, tot deze illegale fundament waarop gebouwd wordt in strijd met resoluties 1514, 1541 en 2625 van de Verenigde Naties en verder ook niet-conform hoofdstuk XI, artikel 73, inzake “Verklaring betreffende niet-zelfbesturende gebieden”.

Uiteindelijk heeft de Minister van Koninkrijksrelaties dr. R Plasterk medio december 2013 bij de behandeling en beraadslaging inzake Vastelling van de begrotingsstaat van de Koninkrijkrelaties (IV) voor het jaar 2014 (33750-IV) overduidelijk in antwoord op kamervragen omtrent onze eerder verwoorde standpunt over het respecteren  van onze mensen en volkenrechten weggenomen. Hij maakte hierin duidelijk dat er een misverstand is ontstaan over de gemaakte afspraken voor de staatkundige vernieuwingen die niet voldoen of in strijd zijn met het internationaal volkenrecht en dat wij alsnog als Bonaire(BES eilanden) en conform het Handvest van de Verenigde Naties recht op hebben op een (nieuwe) referendum.  De Minister maakte duidelijk dat Nederland als lid van VN deze afspraken respecteert en dat de BES eilanden zelf het initiatief kunnen nemen om de gemaakte fouten te corrigeren. Minister Plasterk bekrachtigd dit met brief datum 8 januari 2014 kenmerk nr: 2014-0000012853 aan Stichting Nos Kier Boneiru Bek  en de sluitalinja luidde:

“Dat de bevolking van Bonaire het recht heeft om haar stem te laten horen en recht heeft op zelfbeschikking, is een verworvenheid die niet ter discussie staat en onverkort door het kabinet onderschreven wordt.” Daarna was de Secretaris-Generaal van de Ministerie van BZK  mr Richard van Zwol op Bonaire die dit ratificeerde en verder verklaarde dat als het volk kiest voor een andere staatsverband met Nederland in het Koninkrijk dit Nederland raakt maar dat Nederland deze discussie met ons moet aangaan.

Op Bonaire heeft de konstante roep en een petitie voor een referendum aan de eilandsraad(ruim 3000 firmanten) alsmede het goede nieuws dat Nederland zal meewerken met een mogelijke nieuwe keuze van het volk, een positieve ontwikkeling onder de politieke partijen teweeg gebracht. Bijna alle politieke partijen en voornamelijk de in de eilandsraad vertgenwoordigers hebben een “historisch moment bereikt door te verenigen met het doel een referendum te organiseren” zodat het volk haar stem kan laten horen, omdat het zover gebleken is dat de nieuwe status niet is wat ze hebben verwcht of hebben gewenst. Deze wens werd door een unanieme motie door alle eilandsraadsleden p 25 februari 2014 vastgelegd en daarna bekrachtigt in het besluit van 4 april en resulteerde ook tot het instellen van een “Adviescommissie referendum”.

Dus het volk van Bonaire dat verdeeld was door de 10-10-10 misleiding in het nieuwe staatsstructuur “Openbaar Lichaam” was eindelijk op weg naar verzoening en hereniging. Het volk werd opgelucht en blij dat er uiteindelijk de politiek op Bonaire de signalen van het volk voor een kans om zijn stem te laten horen respecteerde en het samenhorigheidsgevoel als volk keerde weer terug op Bonaire.

Het hele process liep in de goede richting totdat de ex-politicus, ex-lijder van de UPB partij , Dhr Booi , vrijgesproken werd in de door het Openbaar Ministerie aangespannen strafzaak.  Dhr Booi liet direct weten dat hij terugkeert in de politiek en in de eilandsraad om de zaken met Nederland weer op te pakken. Frappant is dat hij op dezelfde dag bij het inwijden en in gebruik nemen van het vernieuwe raadszaal en opgeroepen raadsvergaderng om het raport van de referendum commissie oficieel te behandelen, direkt na zijn beediging bij zijn re-entree speech liet blijken dat er geen referendum zou komen omdat hij wel, nu hij vrij gesproken is , met Nederland kan gaan onderhandelen om de situatie van Bonaire te verbeteren. De eilandsraad, dus de coalitie gevormd door UPB fractie en fractie Santana, met Booi als nieuw lid en nieuwe aanpak, besloot aan het einde van het beraad door hoofdelijke stemming de referendum traject te stoppen. Daarna rijkte hij aan de eilandsraad een zgn Mission Paper aan die door de coalitie als motie werd aangenomen welke hij dan verder met Nederland gaat onderhandelen inzake de staatkundige stuctuur en verbeteringen voor Bonaire.

Dit komt als een emmer koud water over het hele volk heen, die eindelijk weer hoop begon te krijgen, door de positieve ontwikkeling en verenigen van de politiek voor Bonaire door een referendum te organiseren  waarbij  de volkswil en stem uiteindelijk gehoord kon worden, maar nu door de eigenhandige dicatoriale boycot van het referendum door Booi en groep haar stem en keuze als volk zag wegsmelten.

Wij richten ons aan u met het verzoek dat u geen enkele afspraken meer aangaat met Booi, die trouwens volgens het Openbaar Ministerie nog steeds verdachte is in de strafzaken tegen hem,  en zijn groep aangaande onze volkenrechten en dat de verdragen van de VN  gerespecteerd dienen te worden door alle politci, bestuurders zowel van Bonaire als van Nederland, totdat het volk zich heeft uitgesproken middels een volksraadpleging confrom het zelfbeschikkingsrecht.

Het moge duidelijk zijn dat de status Openbaar Lichaam Bonaire op drijfzand is gebouwd, internationale wetstoetsing niet doorstaat en dat er een referendum moet komen om recht te doen aan het volk van Bonaire.

Het is een publiek volksgeheim ondertussen, dat Dhr Booi, en tegen alle rationele en logika in, vrijgesproken is om de referendum te stoppen en het volk van Bonaire op dictaroliale wijze van haar recht op een referendum uit te oefenen. Het vertrouwen van het volk in de democratische rechtstaat is gedaald naar nihil door deze beslissingen en ervaringen.

Er zijn genoeg indicaties en insuanaties hierdoor die ernaar duiden dat Booi door Nederland onder politieke dwang handelt anders hij dan wel veroordeeld zal worden. Dit is ondertussen een terugkerend verschijnsel rond de verkiezingen, waarbij Booi precies in de aanloop naar de verkiezing van zijn beschuldigingen en aantijgingen en rechtzaken vrijgesproken wordt en dan direkt daarna met de vrijspraak politieke voordelen en populariteit geniet en aan de macht komt of blijft.

Ik ben bereid dit op deze manier te verklaren daar ik zelf persoonlijk hiermee tenminste tweemaal heeft meegemaakt. De eerste keer was in de aanloop naar de verkiezing dat Elvis Tjin A Sjoe , hoogste votegetter van de UPB, ex-minister, etc, mijn jeugdvriend, mij vertelde dat de hele commotie rond Booi’s  rechtzitting en aantijgingen niet helemaal is wat het lijkt maar een soort scene is dat goedkomt als de verkiezing nadert. Ik had er echt problemen mee daar het hele Boneriaanse politieke panorama en de staatsstructuur die illegaal tot stand kwam door Booi verdedigd en beschermd word, een  soort ego-trip is geworden, en onze volk heeft verdeeld,  en dat hij met zijn politieke macht het uiterst moeilijk zal maken om het recht en stem van het volk tot uiting te brengen. De tweede keer dat ik in aanraking kwam met deze kwestie is dat ik na een radio en televisie-interview bij de zendstation van Dhr Booi, Radio Energia, ongeveer anderhalf jaar geleden, door hem persoonlijk werd aangesproken.

Hij intimideerde mij bewust en krachtig dat ik moest stoppen met protesteren tegen het staatstructuur daar ik teveel energie en tijd van hun verspilde met al het protest, acties en brieven etc, en beter met hun moest samenwerken om het te verbeteren. En op mijn vraag hoe hij dat ging oplossen, daar eerder door iedereen en hunzelf via de media heeft verklaard dat er niets meer gedaan kan worden aan het staatsstructuur en wij vooruit moesten gaan kijken en het beste eruit moesten gaan proberen te halen etc. Zijn reactie en oplossing aan mij was dat ik me geen zorgen hoefde te maken, omdat hij ondanks dat hij verdachte is en door de Openbare Ministerie aangeklaagd is vrij komt en dan weer de politiek in ga om met Nederland te gaan onderhandelen en de situatie van de staatstructuur te verbeteren. Dus door mijn eigen persoonlijke ervaring en aanraking met dit publieke geheim was het niet echt een verassing dat Booi net een week voor de behandeling van de referendum in de eilandsraad vrijgesproken werd en dat hij direkt zijn missie zoals verteld aan mij persoonlijk ging voltooien, dus stoppen van het  referendum en uitsluiten van de volk van Bonaire van het laten horen van zijn stem, en verder opbouwen met Nederland aan de “illegale” staatkundige status van Openbaar Lichaam Bonaire.

Wij vragen u degelijk rekening te houden met deze verklaringen dat bij het Boneriaanse volk echt de laatste druppel in het volle emmer is gevallen, en om echt niet verder te forceren om haar recht af te nemen, en doen alsof iedereen zijn neus bloed en verder met Booi en zijn genoten verder gaat onderhandelen.
Als er geen mogelijkheid is om door middel van een “maatregel van bestuur” door de Nederlands  bestuur  een zelf-beschikkings-referendum conform de eisen en regels van Verenigde Naties te organiseren voor het volk van Bonaire, door de impliciete boycot van Booi, dat u dan in naam van het volk van Bonaire, door uw erkenning dat de 10-10-10 akkoorden niet conform de internatioanle volkensrecht door het Boneriaans (en Statiaans) volk is geligitimeerd, geen enkele besprekeing meer te voeren op de staatstrcutuur nivo, totdat het Boneriaans  volk conform de VN verdragen en regels zijn stem en wens door middel van een volksraadsplegen heeft laten horen.

 Ik hoop namens de Stichting Nos Kier Boneiru Bek en de ruim drieduizend firmanten van een petitie tot het houden van een referendum, dat u met dit verzoek instemt.
In afwachting op uw inhoudelijke reactie, verblijf ik,

Namens de Stichting Nos Kier Boneiru Bek,
Postbus 341, Bonaire. Email: jamesfinies@gmail.com

15 June 2014

Descolonización de Puerto Rico ¡Únete a 2 protestas hasta lograrlo!



sábado, 14 de junio de 2014

¿Por qué los puertorriqueños protestan en la ONU? / Why are Puerto Ricans protesting at the UN?


¿Por qué estamos protestando en la Organización de Naciones Unidas (ONU)?

1.      Estamos protestando el hecho de que Puerto Rico ha sido una colonia de Estados Unidos por 116 años y esa relación política es un crimen en contra de la humanidad bajo la ley internacional

2.      Estamos protestando el hecho de que Estados Unidos ha ignorado 32 resoluciones de la ONU pidiéndole que inmediatamente descolonice a Puerto Rico

3.      Estamos protestando la hipocresía del Presidente Obama que dice que admira a Nelson Mandela mientras se niega a excarcelar a nuestro preso político puertorriqueño de 33 años Oscar López Rivera que esta haciendo exactamente lo mismo que hizo Mandela

4.      ¡Y por último, estamos protestando porque estamos convencido de que después de 116 años, de Puerto Rico ser una colonia de Estados Unidos, el gobierno de Estados Unidos no cree en la justicia para todos!

Por lo tanto, tenemos que protestar aquí el 16 de junio, la semana que viene el 23 de junio, y todos los años hasta que tengamos un tsunami de gente que llegue al nivel necesario para obligar el gobierno de Estados Unidos a cumplir con las 32 resoluciones de la ONU. 
 
English
 
Why are we protesting at the UN?
 
1.      We are protesting the 116 years that Puerto Rico is a colony of the United States, because it is a crime against humanity under international law.  
 
2.      We are protesting because the US government has ignored 32 UN resolutions asking it to immediately decolonize Puerto Rico.  
 
3.      We are protesting the hypocrisy of President Obama when he claims to admire Nelson Mandela, but, at the same time, refuses to release Puerto Rican Political prisoner of 33 years Oscar López Rivera for doing exactly the same thing Mandela did.  
 
4.      And lasting, we are protesting because we are convinced that after 116 years of Puerto Rico being a US colony, the US government does not believe in justice for all.
 
Therefore, we must protest on Monday, June 16, next Monday on June 23, and every year until a tsunami of people reaches the threshold needed to force the US government to comply with the 32 UN resolutions. 

13 June 2014

June 16 Protests to be held at United Nations on Decolonization of Puerto Rico


On the day that Puerto Rico (PR) celebrated the abolition of slavery, March 22, 2014, we had our First Oscar – Mandela Protest in Puerto Rico.  It was a huge success!  Click on the link below to see TeleSur's coverage of our protest and 2 others that occurred on that day: 
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x1ja9pi_conmemora-pr-abolicion-de-esclavitud-exige-libertad-para-lopez-rivera_news

Today, Monday, June 16, 2014, we are having the first of two protests called, The First Oscar – Mandela Protests in New York City.  The second one will be next Monday, on the very day that the United Nations holds its annual hearing on the decolonization of Puerto Rico - June 23, 2014.

Puerto Rico has been a colony of the United States for 116 years.  Before that, Puerto had been a colony of Spain for 405 years.  Puerto Rico has never been an independent nation
Despite the fact that colonialism violates the United Nations’ (UN) Universal Human Rights Resolution, and its 1960 Resolution 1514 (XV) that pronounces that colonialism is a crime against humanity because of its threat to world peace, the government of the United States (US) has ignored thus far 32 UN resolutions asking it to immediately decolonize Puerto Rico.  The UN has specifically asked the US to immediately release from prison Puerto Rican political prisoner of 33 years Oscar López Rivera in the more recent resolutions.  Martin Luther King would have explained why this way, “Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.”  It is noteworthy to mention that these resolutions are approved by over 90% of the UN.  If the United States really is about promoting democracy around the world, here’s an excellent example of her not practicing what she’s preaching!
Those of us who have had the tenacity to study the real Puerto Rican history since 1493 are convinced that 116 years of US colonialism means that the US government has no intentions of ever decolonizing Puerto Rico.  So what is a realistic way to force the US to comply with the 32 UN resolutions?
We need to find a way to unite all those who agree with the UN that colonialism is a crime against humanity to peacefully protest for the decolonization of Puerto Rico.  These protests must be permanent, so that more protesters may unite, as their level ofindignation grow, each year that the US government ignores yet another UN resolution to decolonize Puerto Rico.  One thing is irrefutable.  The US government does not believe in justice for all, after 116 years of Puerto Rico colonialism!  More at
www.TodosUnidosDescolonizarPR.blogspot.com

12 June 2014

Jail sentence called for Tahiti president


PAPE'ETE, French Polynesia--- The prosecution in the trial of the French Polynesian president Gaston Flosse has called for him to be given a two-year jail sentence and a US$110,000 fine for abuse of public funds.


The criminal court in Papeete has been hearing the case of a total of six people accused of corruption over an atoll purchase 12 years ago.

They are jointly accused of having abused public funds by buying Anuanuraro atoll off a leading pearl producer, Robert Wan, for nine million US dollars which was five times its value.

The prosecution also wants a two-year jail sentence for Wan, who is one of the territory's richest people.

Local radio says a verdict is not expected until October.

The prosecution says it will leave it to the judge to determine the penalties for key ministers at the time, such as Gaston Tong Sang, Georges Puchon and Edouard Fritch.

The defence has called for their acquittal, saying the valuations were wrong.

Gaston Flosse, who is the politician within the French system with the largest number of convictions, has been sentenced to prison in several corruption cases, some of them for crimes dating back more than 20 years.


However, the veteran politician has appeals pending and remains free until any of the sentences is confirmed.


lemonde.fr
____________________


RNZI/PACNEWS



The French Polynesian president Gaston Flosse says he is not concerned about the prosecution’s call for him to be given a two-year jail sentence and a US$110,000 fine for abuse of public funds.


The criminal court in Papeete has heard a total of six people accused of corruption over an atoll purchase 12 years ago.

They are jointly accused of having abused public funds by buying Anuanuraro atoll off a leading pearl producer, Robert Wan, for US$9 million which was five times its value.

The defence says it wants the six to be all acquitted, describing the atoll purchase as a political decision to build up a land reserve.

A ruling in this case is expected in September.

Later this month, Gaston Flosse will appear in the court of appeal to challenge a five-year prison sentence and a US$110,000 fine for corruption.

The case revolves around two million US dollars in kickbacks over 12 years to Flosse and his party in return for a French advertising executive getting public sector contracts.

A ruling in France's highest court has been pending for more than a year in another major corrpution case, which if his appeal is lost, spells the end of his political career.

11 June 2014

Guam: Self-Determination, or More U.S. Troops?




world


Usually, when someone refers to a place as a "U.S. colony," they are making an analogy, suggesting that U.S. influence somewhere is so strong, and the indigenous residents of the place have so little effective say over key decisions, that it's as if the place were a formal U.S. colony.

But, remarkably, and perhaps predictably, for a country whose leaders, editorialists and pundits constantly pontificate about how we are an indispensable force for freedom in the world, we rarely discuss the fact that there are places in the world that are actual U.S. colonies. Still less do we consider whether we are complying with our international obligations to respect the right of self-determination for colonized peoples, and if we are not, what we could do to change that.

READ FULL ARTICLE HERE.

10 June 2014

West Papua and Rapa Nui on agenda of civil society campaigns for the next five years

By Online Editor


Civil society organisations in the Pacific have committed to enthusiastically take up the fight for the people of West Papua and Rapa Nui to break free from the shackles of colonial rule.

Both West Papua and Rapa Nui are not on the list of non-self-governing territories administered by the United Nations Special Committee on Decolonisation, commonly known as the Committee of 24 of C24.

Part of this renewed call from civil societies is direct engagement with governments of the Pacific to keep the struggles for independence for the peoples of West Papua and Rapa Nui on their agenda.

Speaking in Suva this week on behalf of 13 regional civil society groups – Peter Emberson of the Pacific Conference of Churches (PCC) said this energized campaign stems from ongoing dialogue and discussions on rethinking a new pathway for Oceania.

“We are devising our work around mobilizing civil societies around the Pacific region to actively engage their people to stand up and speak out about injustices done to the peoples and territories that are still under the yoke of colonialism.

“We need to remember the price that some of us have paid for freedom. We need to recall the journey that has brought us here. It then becomes our moral obligation, to stand and speak out for the struggle of others. We become less human when we are comfortable in our spaces of convenience while others are still fighting to be free, said Emberson.

He said for the next five years, the church wants to bring back on its agenda and that of governments in the region the urgent engagement in support of the decolonisation of Pacific communities that still remain under colonial rule.

“Churches in the region have been trying to build their work on the Maohi people of French Polynesia and the push for the re-listing of West Papua on the UN list of decolonised territories. The churches have a long history on the campaign towards political independence in the Pacific. However, over time, the issue has fallen off the agenda, said Emberson.

PCC and civil societies have singled out Fiji and Papua New Guinea as key contact points because of their membership of the United Nations Special Committee on Decolonisation.

“We have not been fully engaged with the two governments. This joint action will kick-start this region wide campaign to engage governments, trade union movements, institutions and the peoples of the Pacific, said Susana Tuisawau of the Pacific Foundation for the Advancement of Women (PACFAW), another regional civil society that is part of the campaign in support of West Papua and Rapa Nui.

Apart from engaging directly with Fiji and PNG, civil societies are looking to other regional decision making processes to lobby for support.

Murray Isimeli, also of PCC said civil societies need to influence the highest level political body, the Pacific Islands Forum (PIF) to take a stronger position on West Papua and Rapa Nui.

“Ever since 2004, the issue of West Papua has been reflected on the communiqués but it has tended to be weak because of the complexities of sovereignty. Despite the efforts of countries like Vanuatu, the issue remains part of the Leaders discussion only without any commitment for strong action, said Isimeli.

“It’s time that the Pacific Islands Forum take some strong action.

Isimeli said civil societies are portraying a message of hope in this renewed regional campaign on decolonisation.

“Two years we thought it was impossible but the people of Maohi Nui in French Polynesia are celebrating their one year of re-inscription into the UN List. For us then, our message is the message of hope, that we can mobilise our peoples and governments to bring about change. 

“Our message is to act now, we cannot wait, said Isimeli.

Tuisawau believes in the power of the people.

“If you go back in history, the more voices and more determined people are, they can make governments change their decision. An example was the protest in Fiji and across the region in the late 1980s that forced France to halt nuclear testing in Mururoa in French Polynesia.

The renewed call for commitment on decolonisation was made in Suva this week by the PRNGO Alliance, an association comprised of 13 regional non-governmental organisations. The call coincides with the regional meeting of the UN Special Committee on Decolonisation in Nadi.