07 March 2014

Virgin CEO Richard Branson Vows to Turn Caribbean Islands Green

EcoWatch

While Sir Richard Branson is preparing to make the $13.6 million Moskito island his new “family complex,” the billionaire says the move can impact a lot more than just his luxurious profile.

Along with Necker island, which Branson rents for nearly $55,000 a night, Moskito will userenewable energy for 75 to 80 percent of its electricity, according to The Guardian. Using technical and financial blueprints from his green business group, Carbon War Room, and the Rocky Mountain Institute, Branson will offer advice to help all Caribbean governments cut diesel imports and switch to renewable sources. He believes the two properties can become models for islands around the world. 

“This is personal and global,” said Branson, founder of the Virgin Group, which consists of about 400 businesses. “We know that islands will suffer the most from climate change and sea-level rise. Reefs will be devastated, and wildlife decimated.”

READ FULL ARTICLE HERE.



Bonaire Government requests U.N. listing as non self-governing territory



Infobonaire.com
The Island Council of Bonaire has voted to request the United Nations to list the dependency as a non self-governing territory. Bonaire is a partially integrated "public entity" of the Kingdom of the Netherlands. The political status resulted from the dismantling of the former autonomous country of the Netherlands Antilles, creating two autonomous countries of Curacao and Sint Maarten, and three "public entities of Bonaire, Saba and St. Eustatius.


Decision of the Island Council of Bonaire

(unofficial translation from Papiamento)
 February 25, 2014

Considering that:

-The situation of the state structure and relation with Holland requires attention and priority;

-Since the country Netherlands Antilles has been dissolved on 10 October 2010, Bonaire has become a non-autonomous territory, qualified according to the United Nations (U.N.) as “Non Self Governing Territories”;

-Consequently it is necessary that Bonaire be put on the (U.N.) list of Non Self Governing Territories;

-After the referendum of September 10, 2004, Bonaire since 10 October 2010 (10-10-10) has been denominated as Public Entity according to article 134 of the Dutch constitution which has been interpreted as integration in Holland;

- The Island Council considers it necessary for the people of Bonaire have the opportunity to express its wishes thru a plebiscite on the future relation of Bonaire with Holland;

-to make the necessary preparations it is desirable to install a “Preparatory Commission”  to analyze and advise on all the necessary steps to start the process to realize a referendum;

Taking notice of:

-The Charter of the United Nations  in particular the covenants regarding “Non Self Governing Territories” and the concerned resolutions, particularly Resolution 1541;

Decides:

1. to appeal to President of the Island Council to approach formally the United Nations through the official channels with the request to put Bonaire on the “List of Non Self Governing Territories”;

.2 to form a “Preparatory Commission” for which every fraction can appoint a member to analyze and give advice to the Island Council on the best way to organize a referendum in accordance with Resolution 1541 of the United Nations, taking into consideration all related aspects and to report to the Island Council within 4 weeks

3. to agree that within 1 week the 4 fractions will appoint a member to the preparatory commission. The 4 members together will appoint a 5th member to the preparatory commission


4. to appeal to the “griffier(Council Secretary) to (let) give all necessary assistance to the “Preparatory Commission” to effect it's task.

*****

See also: 

Bonaire group petitions for self-determination referendum


Cultural Impacts of Bonaire 'Integration' with Netherlands







06 March 2014

Marshall Islands wants U.S. to resolve unfinished H-bomb legacy




Marshall Islands President Christopher Loeak has called on the United States to resolve the “unfinished business” of its nuclear testing legacy in the western Pacific nation.

Compensation provided by Washington “does not provide a fair and just settlement” for the damage caused, he told a ceremony in the capital Majuro on Saturday marking the 60th anniversary of the devastating hydrogen bomb test at Bikini Atoll which contaminated many islands with radioactive fallout.

“We remain the closest of friends with the United States, but there is unfinished business relating to the nuclear weapons testing that must be addressed.” Loeak said the unfinished business not only affected the four atolls that the United States acknowledged as exposed, but also many other islands throughout the country.

On March 1, 1954, the United States detonated a 15-megaton hydrogen bomb on Bikini Island. The blast was 1000 times more powerful than the explosion of the atomic bomb that destroyed Hiroshima in 1945. 

The series of nuclear tests the U.S. conducted in the Marshall Islands in the 1950s vaporized several atolls and exposed thousands in the surrounding area to radioactive fallout.

Sixty years later, the Bikini Atoll is still so irradiated that it is uninhabitable. 

The surviving original residents of Bikini Atoll and their descendents have been displaced from their home island for six decades and are still unable to return due to dangerously high levels of radiation. 

In 1983, 29 years after the March 1, 1954 explosion, a compensation agreement was reached in which Washington provided the Marshall Islands with $150 million to settle all nuclear test claims.

But more than 10 years later, during then president Bill Clinton’s administration, formerly secret documents about the nuclear tests were released and confirmed dozens of islands were exposed to the fallout.

Loeak called this “dramatic new information” that had not been revealed to Marshall Islands negotiators.

“It is abundantly clear that the agreement was not negotiated in good faith and does not provide a fair and just settlement of the damages caused,” he said.

Residents of the nearby Rongelap and Ailinginae atolls, which bore the brunt of the radioactive fallout, were evacuated three days later, but it was too late for many who had been exposed to near-lethal doses of radiation.

According to one document, the Rongelapese “quickly became test subjects of a U.S. government-sponsored program, Project 4.1, entitled The Study of Response of Human Beings Exposed to Significant Beta and Gamma Radiation Due to Fallout from High Yield Weapons.”

U.S. ambassador Thomas Armbruster, who delivered prepared remarks in both the English and Marshallese languages at the ceremony in Majuro, said “words are insufficient to express the sadness” of the 60th anniversary of the nuclear test.

The United States is continuing to work with the Marshall Islands to provide health care and environmental monitoring of several affected islands, he added.

Bikini Islander Hinton Johnson criticized the level of compensation the displaced Bikinians receive from the U.S.-provided funds.

“Today, each person receives $46 per month or a little over one dollar per day,” he said during the ceremony.

Although the Nuclear Claims Tribunal had awarded the Bikinians more than $560 million in compensation and nuclear test clean up funding, there was no fund to pay them from, he added.

“We ask the U.S. and Marshall Islands governments to provide the money for the tribunal’s award for the time we’ve been homeless and unable to return to our homeland,” Johnson said.

Around 1,800 people marched in Yaizu, Shizuoka Prefecture on Saturday to mark the 60th anniversary of the U.S. hydrogen bomb test at Bikini Atoll, as Japan prepares to commemorate the Fukushima nuclear crisis three years ago, the Japan Times reported.

The 1954 test exposed residents on the Marshall Islands to massive amounts of radiation. The fallout also contaminated the Japanese tuna fishing boat Daigo Fukuryu Maru (Lucky Dragon No. 5), which was near the atoll when the H-bomb detonated.

The ship’s chief radioman, Aikichi Kuboyama, died of acute organ failure only seven months later at the age of 40, while 15 of the boat’s 23 other crew members later died of cancer and other causes.

While the precise cause of Kuboyama’s death has been disputed, the incident sparked an anti-nuclear movement in Japan nine years after Hiroshima and Nagasaki were leveled by atomic bombs in the closing days of World War II.

On Saturday, some 1,800 people marched to Kuboyama’s grave in the port city of Yaizu. The city has held similar events to commemorate the incident for three decades, while the boat has been refitted and put on display at a memorial hall in Tokyo since 1976. It draws around 100,000 visitors every year.

“I want to see nuclear power abolished,” Akira Ibi, a 70-year-old Yaizu citizen, said in an interview, adding he also wants to get rid of the nearby Hamaoka atomic plant on the Pacific coast.

Three years after the Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami of March 11, 2011 killed or left missing around 18,500 people in Tohoku and sent three reactors at the Fukushima No. 1 plant into core meltdowns, tens of thousands of people remain stuck in temporary housing after fleeing the region.

The nation’s 50 nuclear reactors are all currently offline due to the crisis but Prime Minister Shinzo Abe is taking steps to restart some if they are deemed safe for operation.

“The government is trying to restart reactors by overlooking the danger of nuclear power,” Kimiko Abe, 64, told the Mainichi Shimbun. “Nothing has changed after 60 years.”....


Dutch law set to restrict migration, trace and deport the Caribbean Dutch national

Anguilla News


Apartheid turning back? Dutch bill proposal to enact second class citizenship




The Dutch Lower House of Parliament is set to debate a motion concerning residency requirements for Dutch citizens originating from Aruba, CuraƧao and Sint Maarten on March 5 2014 (1830 hrs Dutch local time). If passed, the migration law will ensure that the economically and educationally deprived be legally restricted from settling in the Netherlands. The legislation would also create the possibility for persons – who “objectively meet the criteria” and “upon reasonable suspicion” – to be checked by police in order to establish their identities, nationalities as well as residency status should these persons be found to be infringing the residency requirements (e.g. insufficient education and insufficient command of the Dutch language). The legislation will result in the possible deportation of citizens from the aforementioned islands. These deprived Dutch citizens, who migrate to the Netherlands seeking employment opportunities, will, in turn be disadvantaged in their search for employment

READ FULL ARTICLE HERE.

05 March 2014

French manipulation of New Caledonia electoral list threatens legitimacy of territorial elections

Speech by Roch Wamytan 
President of the Congress of New Caledonia 
Plenary meeting of the United Nations 
 Special Committee on Decolonisation 
30 January 2014 

"This (French) settlement colonisation policy is based in particular on population displacement and transfers...The objective of this settlement policy is to counter the independence of New Caledonia and the Kanak people, i.e. to keep New Caledonia French on behalf of the superior interests of the (French) State."

This speech, concerning the electorate problem in New Caledonia, has to be situated in the general context of French colonial policy and its methods. The current policy is a direct descendant of the well-known “false 
decolonisations”, including by the UN, which have been going on since the last world war of 1940/45, among others, since the Brazzaville conference in 1944. A policy initiated by General de Gaulle and still continued until now.

In this context, the current problem of the special electoral roll for the 2014 provincial elections is not just a technical problem, as the representatives of the French State assert. It is a political problem. This is why the FLNKS and the Labour Party have established a Policy and Citizenship Commission. The current result of their research reveals that a certain number of persons on this special electoral roll do not fulfil the 
applicable conditions provided by the Noumea Accord, the 1992 Organic Law and the Constitutional Law of 23 February 20073 Gradually finding anomalies, this Commission decided to concentrate its research on voters born outside New Caledonia and before 31 October 1980 (see annexed summary table) 4
Today, this FLNKS and Labour Party Commission, after checking its research results, asserts that, on the one hand, 6,720 persons appearing on the special electoral roll for the provincial elections (out of a total of 150,482 voters on the special roll, i.e. 4.46% of those registered on this roll) do not fulfil the applicable required conditions and have thus been wrongly registered on the special electoral roll. In addition, nearly 1,900 Kanak persons are maintained on the annexed table of voters not allowed to vote in the next provincial elections, whereas they are born in New Caledonia, from the indigenous and colonised people, and most of them have never left New Caledonia.

READ FULL STATEMENT OF PRESIDENT WAMYTAN HERE.

le 1er Colloque international en France sur "les impacts humanitaires des essais nuclƩaires"



Ce lundi 20 janvier 2014 a eu lieu le 1er Colloque international en France sur "les impacts humanitaires des essais nucléaires" qui s'est tenue au Palais du Luxemourg, organisé sous le patronage officiel du Sénateur TUHEIAVA avec celui de la sénatrice Mme Leïla Aichi (Goupe EELV).

Vous trouverez ci dessous l'intervention du SƩnateur.

04 March 2014

Millennium Development Goals - Rapa Nui (Easter Island)

Save Rapanui

Millennium Development Goals 


Statement





MDG-8United Nations Millennium Development Goals
Eighth session of the Open Working Group on Sustainable Development Goals
Agenda Item
Rule of Law and Governance
Feb 7, 2014, 9:45 a.m.


Intervention delivered by Santi Hitorangi
Moana Nui/Rapa Nui


I am advocating for Moana Nui, a network of Pacific-wide rights-holders focusing on justice issues concerning resources, trade, militarization and indigenous rights.

In my capacity as a member of the Hitorangi clan from Rapa Nui, I am here to put forward ourmana’u over the eight Millennium Development Goals addressing poverty and hunger, universal education, gender equality, child mortality reduction, maternal health, access to medicines, environmental sustainability and the global partnership. These are all sectors of development that Rapa Nui has been denied, or has not adequately been provided for by Chile.

Otherwise known as Easter Island, Rapa Nui is 3,700 kilometers from the coast of Chile, and claimed as a territory in 1888 under fraudulent circumstances.[i] We are a nation struggling for self-determination, and seek to be recognized by the UN to be placed on the list of non-self-governing territories for decolonization.[ii] We represent an indigenous struggle, a human rights struggle, and a struggle to protect our traditional resources and ecological biodiversity throughout our Pacific island communities.

Chile is one of the original signatories of the Trans Pacific Strategic Economic Partnership, or the TPP, and they are negotiating in the largest free-trade agreement in the world with 12 other countries.[iii] Together these 12 countries represent nearly 28 trillion dollars, about 40% of global GDP.[iv]

Read full report here.

03 March 2014

United Nations Dep. Secretary-General confirms legitimacy of the re-listing of French Polynesia as a non self-governing territory





 Deputy Secretary-General

DSG/SM/748 GA/COL/3260

Department of Public Information • News and Media Division • New York

Decolonization Message Must Reach Wide Audience, Says Deputy Secretary-General

Applauding Special Committee’s Latest Efforts at Opening of 2014 Session

Following are UN Deputy Secretary-General Jan Eliasson’s remarks at the opening of the 2014 session of the Special Committee on Decolonization:

I thank you for this opportunity to address the Special Committee, the “C‑24”, at the start of its work this year. 
We are now in the middle of the Third International Decade for the Eradication of Colonialism, and we have already seen encouraging signs of rejuvenation of the work of the Special Committee. For example, the General Assembly last year recognized that French Polynesia remains a Non-Self-Governing Territory. This effectively mandated the Special Committee to consider an additional item on the agenda
For the first time in many years, the Bureau held several meetings with each of the four administering Powers — France, New Zealand, the United Kingdom and the United States, as well as various other stakeholders, in order to identify next steps in the decolonization process. I welcome the intensification of the face-to-face talks among interested parties. I also appreciate that all administering Powers have given the green light in principle for visiting missions where appropriate. The voice of the C-24 is again becoming loud and clear. 
To the international community, colonialism is a historic aberration. Thus, all of us must take up the challenge of eradicating remaining forms of colonialism, in keeping with the principles of the Charter and relevant United Nations resolutions. 
The decolonization message needs to reach a wide audience. I call for inclusive, proactive and forward-looking efforts by the Special Committee, the administering Powers and the Non-Self-Governing Territories, on a case-by-case basis. This could help trigger a break in a deadlock on some cases, or encourage the Committee to become involved in situations between a Territory and its administering Power. 
The 17 Non-Self-Governing Territories look to the United Nations for comprehensive and sustained initiatives for the future. The Special Committee has begun to open a wider window of opportunities. Still, the pace of decolonization remains slow. I am confident that the year ahead will be a period of intensified diplomatic efforts on decolonization as the Committee continues to build on its recent steps forward in dialogue and consensus-building. These include the planned expansion of the Special Committee’s Bureau, with the addition of Indonesia, and the first visiting mission of the decade, to New Caledonia. 
The Special Committee is a unique platform to advance the historic decolonization mandate of the United Nations. The Secretariat will continue to support the Special Committee in its important work. 
I count on your leadership and I wish you success.

02 March 2014

Bougainville President thinks a lot like our Australian colonial ‘masters’


 Papua New Guinea Mine Watch


Charles Barnes
Charles Barnes thought and spoke like John Momis on the issue of Panguna mine
Brothers by other mothers?
The now departed Minister for Territories, Charles Barnes, had a tad paler complexion, and hailed from rural Australia – but he certainly thought so much like the ABG’s current President, John Momis, you cant tell them apart.
Here is what Charles Barnes said about mining on Bougainville in 1969, immediately after he had sent in the riot squads to beat up Bougainville’s protesting mothers:
"The attitude of a handful of people [women landowners] may attract our sympathy, and we may go to considerable lengths to resolve their problems. But in the last resort, we cannot allow them to block this great prospect [Rio Tinto mine] and thus throw into doubt the policies on which the futures of more than two million people depend
“Mr Barnes said the people of the Territory had a choice of whether to drift in a primitive and backward situation depending on the generosity of the Australian taxpayer, or to advance as a modern State financed by its own sources”.
And what does his long lost brother, Honest John Momis say now he is facing a revolt among the landowners of Panguna, who wont go along with his hand-picked ‘chiefs’ … well:
“This minority of leaders risk destroying the positive partnership that landowners and the ABG have worked so hard to create and undermine preparations for negotiations with Bougainville Copper Limited and the National Government”.
“The ABG supports re-opening Panguna, we see that as the most realistic way of contributing to broad-based economic growth, and generating the ABG revenues required to meet the needs of our people”.
The colonial playbook is alive and well – tell the ‘natives’ the project is all about them, for their benefit, and only extreme and primitive outsiders would dare oppose ‘development’. Then take the ore, make the cash, and leave behind a smouldering wreck.
Honest John and Barnes the Impaler you two are a match made in heaven.

28 February 2014

Guam History and Chamorro Heritage Day

2.26.2014chamorroheritageday

LE CENTRE POLITIQUE EN CRISE

Special to OTR

LA NATION

 QUOTIDIEN D'INFORMATION EN LIGNE FONDƉ LE 21 FEVRIER 2005 
 NEUVIƈME ANNƉE N°962 DU 20 JANVIER 2014 
 1801/2014 : 213e ANNƉE DE LA NATION GUADELOUPE 


worldatlas.com
Le centre du systĆØme colonial franƧais brĆ»le Ć  nouveau. Le prĆ©sident de la rĆ©publique qui s'Ć©tait fait Ć©lire pour une prĆ©sidence normale censĆ©e mettre un terme aux frasques de la prĆ©sidence prĆ©cĆ©dente est selon les plus rĆ©cents sondages rejettĆ© par une large partie de l'opinion franƧaise. C'est la premiĆØre sous la 5e rĆ©publique que l'on assiste Ć  un tel phĆ©nomĆØne. Rien n'arrĆŖte cette lame de fond .Les initiatives prises par le prĆ©sident se retournent contre lui et son gouvernement . Sa conversion subite au libĆ©ralisme et sa proposition de pacte de responsabilitĆ© semblent au contraire accentuer son divorce avec l'opinion franƧaise.Le dĆ©sarroi de l’Ć©lectorat de gauche, que traduit la marĆ©e basse des sondages de popularitĆ© de l’exĆ©cutif, est devenu une rĆ©alitĆ© durable. En Guadeloupe par contre où il n 'y a pas d'observations rĆ©guliĆØres de l'Ć©tat de l'opinion, il semble que l'on assiste au mĆŖme phĆ©nomĆØne de rejet ou de mĆ©fiance probablement pour des raisons diffĆ©rentes . Quand au sein d'un systĆØme colonial le centre est en difficultĆ© les marges de manœuvre pour la contestation de ce systĆØme s'Ć©largissent considĆ©rablement. Cependant pour que la situation bascule ou se mette en position de bascule, il faut que les forces politiques qui contestent l'ordre Ć©tabli soient aptes Ć  saisir les opportunitĆ©s. Malheureusement,aujourd'hui ces forces politiques nationales ne donnent pas l'impression de pouvoir changer le cours des choses tant elles sont dĆ©sorganisĆ©es .